Che the terrorist?

[Guest]

I have heard about Che being involved or connected to terrorism? I always heard he was on the U.S. list of terrorists. Does anyone have anymore informatiom on this?

[Derar]

anyone who is against the US is considered a terrorist !!

[psycho chicken]

well i guess i'm a terrorist!

[Freiheit]

che would never kill kids and women.

[TheGranma]

Certainly not! Che actually condemns terrorism in "Guerilla Warfare" as an act of cowardice i believe.

[Derar]

ofcourse che wasn't a terrorist .
he was a goddamn hero
a freedom fighter

but dont u all think we need to define terrorism !

[booga]

is there any association to the word "terrorist" and "terrible"?

[LeftoverAnimal]

Che never took part in events that are what people count as terrorism, he was a Guerilla warrioir which is a different ball game entirley!

[El Commandante]

Also when Che was in Bolivia he wouldn't execute prisoners, he would take any kit that they had that the group needed, question them, feed them and then send them back to their own lines. Many others would have just shot them in a ditch, but he didn't ...

[mazahua]

In america anything that goes against the national interest is wrong, when Che Guevara lived there was the fear of communism,with the cold war and everything, he was called a terrorist cause he did not believe in american imperialism.
Since the 1940's the usa has controled most of the latin american world through commerce and placing puppet presidents, dictators, etc... they would sell they're people in guarantee of they're own success, but thats a long story. america was just scared that he would ignite the flame that would start revolution all over latin america, and take the goods of all the countries exploited by the usa and use them for theyre own people, like they did in Cuba.

Prefiero morir de pie, que vivir de rodillas
-Emiliano Zapata

[jimr]

Terrorism is judged by the ruler of that country. Thus those in power, would condemn guerrila warfare as terrorism. It seems to be that lately the very defination of the word terrorism has been changed to give authorities, or rather, America, justifcation to it citizens, and indeed the world, to crush their enemies with no mercy.

[libereco]

guerillia warfare is never terrorism...because guerillias face their enemy openly. Of course they have to use some tactics, but the confrontation is a possibility.

[Guest]

Be careful whom you label a terrorist. Anyone acting against the accepted norm generally falls into this category.

[Avamatha]

Somehow I'm not surpised. Of course Che was a terrorist, in the eyes of americans. (Don't get me wrong - I DO NOT think so!) Think about it - somebody dared to stand up for the poor people and did some "nasty" things for U.S. Mwaha, Capitalists really suck. It's like: "Ooh, there's some meany, who may crush down us! Let's send the whole army after him!" Covards...

As for Osama bin Laden, well Che wouldn't have done it for civils but have any of you heard about the toy factories in Asia? Somebody in U.S said, that it should be removed [from America to Asia] because if anything happens, like explosions, the money loss will be small, though there are human density is bigger. Well, the factory was removed and - surprise! it exploded. Over 10.000 got killed. (Much more, I can't remember the right amount now.)

There 'ya go.


(Edited by Avamatha at 4:33 pm on Dec. 11, 2001)

[libereco]

as i already said, by defnition he was most definatly not a terrorist.

militair that is willing to fight in a real battle is not a terrorist organisation in any way. Terrorists strife to gain control by TERROR not by fighting. They try to terrorize people until they give up, lose faith in their government or whatever. They won't fight an open battle, they would hide.

[MJM]

The capitalists label anyone they fight against terrorists,right now there are Maoist 'terrorists' fighting in Nepal. Propaganda is all it is, if Che was alive now they'd have him on the list alright. It's a good way to scare the shit out of the public.