Thread: Real vs ideal

Results 1 to 12 of 12

  1. #1
    Join Date Jul 2001
    Location The Netherlands/Holland
    Posts 181
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    i think che is the ideal thing which didnt mix with the real thing castro

    so the real uses the ideal to make the ppl think that the ideal will change the real but the power is whit the real and its not going to change itself

    but castro also did good things

    so true

    better then batista

    way

    yes, he did

    yes

    but the freedoms are not there. He should trust the ppl by now. They have stuck by him

    but he became as controlling as but let ppl life in the ilusion of socialism

    espcially, the censoring of music, films,internet,anarchists etc.





    ppl cant judge from other ppls thinking of good and bad they can only hate the ppl who decide

    I would never support a socialism that did that...............
    respect equality liberation imagine
  2. #2
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 32
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Amen to that
  3. #3
    Join Date Nov 2001
    Location America
    Posts 202
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    im a bit confused since i am not studied in marxism and so far everything i have read on che doesnt talk about it in great depth. i am currently reading a book on the u.s. constitution which describes the term the "state" and it of course gives the u.s.'s definition of what the "state" is and then it defines "marx". i was suprised to find it in conflict with what the authors write on che and his definition of the "state". i thought i was living che's dream. unless its just another view of u.s. and their anti-che tactics. anyone?
    I personally find myself in rebellion against the fate that history seems to have in store for us, and I suspect that some of you may be equally rebellious. The question is, what can you do? --Leo Szilard, \"Are We On The Road To War?\" Nov 17, 1961
  4. #4
    Join Date Nov 2001
    Posts 102
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Quote: from Markxs on 5:01 am on Oct. 16, 2001

    i think che is the ideal thing which didnt mix with the real thing castro

    so the real uses the ideal to make the ppl think that the ideal will change the real but the power is whit the real and its not going to change itself
    wow, im feeling that one. do you think that could stem from the seperation of church and state? im just grasping straws but i find it hard to believe that i live in the world that is "real" and i am given no authority or power to make it "ideal" . well really i can if i chose to ignore the rest of the world but some people just cant stop thinking about it i guess. (its crazy)

    but think about it, if we combined church and state then it would be weird wouldnt it, something we've never experienced before, almost unimaginable.

    "tripping on my tripas"
  5. #5
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Location Imperialist Britain
    Posts 3,139
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    Surely if we want to improve the real, we should follow our ideals to the extent that they do become real.

    comrade kamo
    <span style=\'color:red\'>www.marxist.com Committee for a Marxist International</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Proleteriat of the world unite&#33; We have nothing to lose but our chains&#33;</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>HandsOffVenezuela in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers and the Venezuelan Revolution</span>
  6. #6
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Posts 111
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    castro is really starting to loosen up. i read something in time magazine (one of the biggest anti-communist propaganda machines in existence) that he invited the hip-hop group orishas to come talk to him. and he also invited the pope to cuba. that seems like loosening up to me. as far as not allowing political activity, i think he's just scared to death that cuba will return to the hellhole it was before. and he also purged the island of stalinist, so its for better or worse. cuba is better off that almost any, if not any country in south america as far as literacy, infant mortality, poverty, and starvation. he hasn't loosened up as much as i'd like, but then again, none of us know the full story. cuba has made advances, but i don't think they're quite at a point where democracy would work.
    \"the destructive impulse is also a creative one\" \"if there truly were a god it would be necessary to abolish him\" -bakunin
  7. #7
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Location Imperialist Britain
    Posts 3,139
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    I agree with red, he has really loosened the grip of authority over the people.
    He has invited many people over, and many people have gone on their own wishes, such as Gerry Adams, and the Manics etc.
    Long live Fidel's spirit. He's a genuinly funny man, respect

    comrade kamo
    <span style=\'color:red\'>www.marxist.com Committee for a Marxist International</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Proleteriat of the world unite&#33; We have nothing to lose but our chains&#33;</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>HandsOffVenezuela in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers and the Venezuelan Revolution</span>
  8. #8
    Join Date Dec 2001
    Location Ireland
    Posts 2,834
    Rep Power 20

    Default

    But the thing is, even talking about democracy in Cuba, do you think that the US would keep their noses out and respect Cuba's sovereignty? I personally doubt it, and there are a number of good examples from the past when they interfered with elections in different countries - Chile, Grenada and, more recently, Venezuela for example.
    “There are no boundaries in this struggle to the death. We cannot be indifferent to what happens anywhere in the world, for a victory by any country over imperialism is our victory; just as any country's defeat is a defeat for all of us.” – Che Guevara

    “We still believe that the struggle of Ireland for freedom is a part of the world-wide upward movement of the toilers of the earth, and we still believe that the emancipation of the working class carries within it the end of all tyranny – national, political and social.” – James Connolly
  9. #9
    Join Date Dec 2001
    Location nz
    Posts 893
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    I fear for Cuba's safety after Castro dies. After all the years of propaganda the people have been getting from the US I think they might turn to capitalism.
    Hopefully they won't.
    I think Castro should stand down before he dies so he can groom and help create a new leader rather than the shit hitting the fan and the US invading. I also wonder if the USSR hadn't have fallen if he would have done this in the 90's but now is too scared things won't come right without the USSR to help support Cuba.
    Here underneath dis laitl stean Laiz Robert Earl of Huntingdon. Near arcir ver az hie sae geud, An pipl kauld im Robin Heud: Sic an utlawz as hi an is men Vil England niver si agen. Obiit 24 Kal, dekembris, 1247 epitaph of Robin Hood
  10. #10
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Location Imperialist Britain
    Posts 3,139
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    I dont think the yanks will dare intefere militeralt in cuba, the fuckheads, otherwise, too many of us are gonna go apeshit, and moreppl will turn left.

    comrade kamo

    You want Direction? LEFT!
    <span style=\'color:red\'>www.marxist.com Committee for a Marxist International</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Proleteriat of the world unite&#33; We have nothing to lose but our chains&#33;</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>HandsOffVenezuela in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers and the Venezuelan Revolution</span>
  11. #11
    Join Date Aug 2001
    Location somewhere on this planet ... some of the time
    Posts 594
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    I don't think the American's would be able to get the backing from the world at large to do it. Not that it's stopped them before...

    But Castro has prepared the country for possible invasion. I read that he has prepared underground bunkers under all of the major cities so they should cause problems for any possible yankee invaders. If they do invade then there would be a massive out cry, I think that it would be an issue that all the left wing groups would scream out against. Even British Labour, maybe not TB, but the hard core back benches for sure.
    Life is a game that we play, that we never get out of alive.
  12. #12
    Join Date Dec 2001
    Location Washington, D.C., the (AIDS) capital of you-know-where
    Posts 1,065
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    Normally, the US would have no problem with interfering with elections/governments. However Cuba's government is more high-profile than any other Latin American country's. It's one of the few governments that Americans care about, other than their own (and even then, we don't always care about our own). Bush can do whatever he wants and no major newspaper will report it (witness the media's ignorance when it comes to the current situation in Bolivia), but even The New York Times could not ignore Cuba.
    \"He\'s an idiot. But he\'s our idiot.\"

Similar Threads

  1. An Ideal about Impeachment
    By Pilar in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 30th March 2007, 15:15
  2. The Ideal
    By The Feral Underclass in forum Websites
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16th August 2004, 12:27
  3. In an ideal world..
    By Engel866 in forum Theory
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11th July 2002, 23:14

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread