Thread: Leon Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed

Results 1 to 9 of 9

  1. #1
    Join Date Apr 2008
    Posts 1,396
    Rep Power 18

    Default Leon Trotsky's The Revolution Betrayed

    Just started reading it and it's quite interesting. I would be curious to hear your critiques of it. It would be good to hear criticisms from people across the spectrum: lefts, anti-revisionists, anarchists, even Trotskyists.

    To get the most out of this thread, please stick to the actual theories and ideas Trosky presents in his book instead of launching personal attacks against him or his followers. In other words, reply only if you've actually read the book.

    Thanks!
  2. #2
    Join Date Mar 2005
    Posts 8,052
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    There's not much really to say from my end. I agree with it is really all I can say.

    I think it would be more interesting if you told us what you think about it.
  3. #3
    Join Date Jun 2008
    Location Israel
    Posts 2,238
    Organisation
    Internationalist Socialist League
    Rep Power 27

    Default

    I think it's an excellent piece of Marxist analysis. I knew you would eventually get to reading it, comrade - I just never thought of suggesting it because I'd imagine every Trot you've met in your life recommended it to you.
    For a Palestinian Workers' State from the Jordan to the Sea!
    For a Socialist Federation of the Middle East!
    For the World Socialist Revolution!
    Rebuild the Fourth International!
    “The Jew is a caricature of a normal, natural human being, both physically and spiritually. As an individual in society he revolts and throws off the harness of social obligation, knows no order nor discipline.” ~Hashomer HaTzair, Zionist "Marxist" movement

    NEW! ISL Website ISL-LRP Statement on Discussions
    Remember Basem Abu Rahme, anti-Apartheid wall protester murdered by Zionist army
  4. #4
    Join Date Sep 2008
    Location Malaga
    Posts 114
    Organisation
    CMI SPAIN.and IMT
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    I read it before the collapsed the soviet Union, It was impresive, and considering the clarity how trosky described and anticpated the crisis o f the stanist states, a real masterpiece
  5. #5
    Join Date Apr 2008
    Posts 1,396
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Hm, I suppose it's either this book has already been discussed a million times (the search function didn't give me many useful results though), or not that many people have actually read it. I'd be surprised if the latter were the case given how frequently 'the Trots' are slagged off here.

    OK, I'll report back with my thoughts once I'm done with it - could take a while though since I'm quite busy at the moment. In the meantime, any comments or tips what to look out for when reading (in the positive as well as negative sense) would be appreciated.

    Speak soon.
  6. #6
    Join Date Sep 2008
    Location Europe
    Posts 134
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    Personally I found his comments on Stakhanovism a bit hypocritical. He's right to condemn it as anti-working class and applaud the resistance the workers showed to it. But it's a bit strange considering Trotsky himself had experimented with the militarization of labor as well, which had also been extremely unpopular with the workers when he tried it, but that hadn't bothered him at the time either.

    The part about the League of Nations and the Comintern which deals with the USSR's rapprochement to the western nations is especially good when viewed in the context of the later development of the Popular Fronts and WW2.

    I'm not a real fan of his references to the French Revolution like the usage of the term "Thermidorian Reaction" to describe the Stalinist counter-revolution, but that's not only restricted to this book. But in general like much of his theoretical work it's certainly a valuable and good read.
  7. #7
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 1,632
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    Hijacking your thread for a bit Nero: I was thinking of reading The Third International After Lenin, should I read The Revolution Betrayed instead?
  8. #8
    Join Date Sep 2008
    Location Europe
    Posts 134
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    Hijacking your thread for a bit Nero: I was thinking of reading The Third International After Lenin, should I read The Revolution Betrayed instead?
    I don't know, personally I'd recommend reading The Revolution Betrayed first.
    But I guess it depends on what you want to read them for.

    The Third International After Lenin was written in 1928 while The Revolution Betrayed was written in 1936, so they deal with fairly different periods.
    Although in one way or another they both deal with the debate about international world revolution versus socialism in one country.

    But The Revolution Betrayed is fairly broad in it's choice of subjects in order to describe and focus on the nature of the USSR and Stalinism. The references to the Comintern, the interaction between fascism and Stalinism and the USSR's entrance into the League of Nations are a smaller part of this.

    While the Third International after Lenin is more about the specifics of the party and the policy of the Comintern but doesnt' really deal with any of the economic or labor issues that The Revolution Betrayed touches on.
  9. #9
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Location Coimbatore,Tamilnadu Indi
    Posts 1,305
    Organisation
    The New Socialist Alternative - Indian Section of CWI
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Hijacking your thread for a bit Nero: I was thinking of reading The Third International After Lenin, should I read The Revolution Betrayed instead?
    Depends on what you want to read about.

    If you want to read about failure of policies of Comintern regarding tactics to counter fascists and in general its policies in other countries then the former would be a good read.

    Latter delas with the Comintern too but in a very detailed and really shows how it correleated with the Zigzags in the internal policies of the Stalinist Beaureaucracy.
    It is possible to build gigantic factories according to a ready-made Western pattern by bureaucratic command – although, to be sure, at triple the normal cost. But the farther you go, the more the economy runs into the problem of quality, which slips out of the hands of a bureaucracy like a shadow. The Soviet products are as though branded with the gray label of indifference. Under a nationalized economy, quality demands a democracy of producers and consumers, freedom of criticism and initiative – conditions incompatible with a totalitarian regime of fear, lies and flattery.
    -Trotsky
    Marx & Engels ! Lenin ! Trotsky

Similar Threads

  1. How Stalin betrayed the Revolution
    By Comrade Hector in forum History
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 15th September 2008, 01:21
  2. The REVOLution betrayed
    By Wanted Man in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12th March 2008, 00:10
  3. The Revolution Betrayed?
    By American_Trotskyist in forum Theory
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15th December 2004, 03:11
  4. Leon Trotsky's "On Lenin's Testament"
    By bolshevik1917 in forum History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th December 2002, 02:30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread