A comrade of mine had a good reply to this;
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]One of the things this shows is that you can’t have a national economy that is built on the finance sector. You actually need a sector that produces real goods.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial] [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]Adam Smith rightly noted that the wealth of nations is contained essentially in commodities – in his day that meant material goods produced for sale on the market.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial] [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]Today the decrepit state of capitalism as a global system means that relatively low profitability in the real economy sends capital into the artificial economy, massively ratcheting up paper values (arbitrary prices/numbers on various kinds of pieces of paper and references on computer databases) and the word ‘commodity’ in bourgeois economic parlance has been narrowed down to describe basically just raw materials and agricultural products.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial] [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]The artificial economy also appeals to the capitalists who, as Marx noted back in the 1860s, have the fantasy that money makes money and would love a circuit of M – M* (where M* equals more money) without having to go through the whole convoluted process of buying plant, machinery, raw materials, labour-power, setting up and organising a production process and then having to market and sell all the commodities produced by that process, all the while maintaining stable socio-political conditions sufficient for that convoluted production process to be worked through.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial] [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][FONT=Arial]This capitalist fantasy continually comes up against reality.[/FONT][/FONT]



