View Poll Results: In the 08 Presidential election ?

Voters 178. This poll is closed
  • Vote for Obama --- (lesser of 2 evils, gradualist approach)

    33 18.54%
  • Vote for McCain --- (hasten "real" Revolution through more disaster)

    3 1.69%
  • Vote Green party --- (at least you'll have clean air while you get screwed)

    13 7.30%
  • Vote for the SWP Candidate Róger Calero

    8 4.49%
  • Stay Home and not validate the process

    40 22.47%
  • Go light a tire on fire in the middle of the highway instead

    35 19.66%
  • Move to Canada

    8 4.49%
  • Write in Eugene V. Debs --- (beats "Mickey Mouse")

    14 7.87%
  • Write in Ron Paul !!! --- (hahaha ... I'd prefer Mickey)

    4 2.25%
  • Other (name below)

    20 11.24%

Thread: Best option (in your opinion) for an American Marxist ?

Results 1 to 20 of 124

  1. #1
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Posts 118
    Rep Power 0

    Question Best option (in your opinion) for an American Marxist ?

    ?
  2. #2
    Join Date Feb 2007
    Location The Imagination
    Posts 594
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Don't vote. It only encourages them.
    I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day. - Douglas Adams



    Political Compass: -9.62, -8.21
  3. #3
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    Don't vote. It only encourages them.
    Furthermore, voting (in terms of democratic theory) is a tacit validation of the candidate. You are basically saying: "I support this candidate as a representative of my interests, to rule over me for the next four years."

    Consciously withholding one's vote is the best option.

    - August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  4. #4
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location cyp-rus
    Posts 5,903
    Rep Power 57

    Default

    go and paint this on the paper:
    i dont know if you cant go,if you cant just dont waste your time for arseholes!

    Fuserg9
    OMONOIA
    ANARCHOCOMMUNIS
    M

    You're never over
  5. #5
    Join Date Mar 2007
    Location Wales
    Posts 675
    Organisation
    Independent
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    Furthermore, voting (in terms of democratic theory) is a tacit validation of the candidate. You are basically saying: "I support this candidate as a representative of my interests, to rule over me for the next four years."

    Consciously withholding one's vote is the best option.

    - August
    "Tactical voting" isn't a bad idea. Personally, I'd vote for the party that could stop the anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, neo-cons remaining in power. It makes sense. Withholding your vote achieves nothing at all.
    “Left wing, chicken wing, it don't make no difference to me.” - Woody Guthrie
  6. #6
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location the smoke
    Posts 6,677
    Organisation
    IWW, Liberty & Solidarity and Workers' Intiative
    Rep Power 64

    Default

    Vote for the best possible, or use your vote to try and block the worst. I suppose for you that'd be McCain, so vote for whoever will best keep him out of power. Or vote for the most left-wing group, so the SWP, depending on your ideals.
    Its like tactical voting over here, where voting for the party who you most agree with can be counter-productive because thats a wasted vote as that party has no chance of election, so you should use your vote to keep out the worst.
    Labour over here sometimes encourage people to vote Lib Dem in areas with little Labour influence to keep out the Conservatives.


    Ivan "Bonebreaker" Khutorskoy
    16.11.2009
    "We won't forget, we won't forgive"
  7. #7
    Join Date Mar 2005
    Posts 2,581
    Organisation
    United Students Against Sweatshops
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    I might vote for Obama, or McKinney, or PSL. But I don't know. The fraction of difference is little.
    "We are now becoming a mass party all at once, changing abruptly to an open organisation, and it is inevitable that we shall be joined by many who are inconsistent (from the Marxist standpoint), perhaps we shall be joined even by some Christian elements, and even by some mystics. We have sound stomachs and we are rock-like Marxists. We shall digest those inconsistent elements. Freedom of thought and freedom of criticism within the Party will never make us forget about the freedom of organising people into those voluntary associations known as parties."
    --Lenin
    Socialist Party (Debs Tendency)
  8. #8
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 10,392
    Rep Power 188

    Default

    Personally, I'd vote for the party that could stop the anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, neo-cons remaining in power.
    And which party would that be, exactly? Surely not the anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, neo-liberal democrats?
    'heavens above, how awful it is to live outside the law - one is always expecting what one rightly deserves.'
    petronius, the satyricon
  9. #9
    Join Date Mar 2007
    Location Wales
    Posts 675
    Organisation
    Independent
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    And which party would that be, exactly? Surely not the anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, neo-liberal democrats?
    Yes.
    “Left wing, chicken wing, it don't make no difference to me.” - Woody Guthrie
  10. #10
    Join Date Jul 2004
    Location Here
    Posts 645
    Organisation
    LFI
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    I'll fill out the majority of the ballot, but probably leave the president portion blank.

    Again.
    -KRS-
  11. #11
    Join Date Nov 2007
    Location the smoke
    Posts 6,677
    Organisation
    IWW, Liberty & Solidarity and Workers' Intiative
    Rep Power 64

    Default

    Whats the ballot paper look like in the US? What options do you get come election time?


    Ivan "Bonebreaker" Khutorskoy
    16.11.2009
    "We won't forget, we won't forgive"
  12. #12
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Posts 215
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    "Tactical voting" isn't a bad idea. Personally, I'd vote for the party that could stop the anti-abortion, anti-gay, pro-war, neo-cons remaining in power. It makes sense. Withholding your vote achieves nothing at all.
    Why would you encourage people to vote for one half of the business party rather than the other?

    I fail to see how Obama is going to be significantly better than George W or McCain.
  13. #13
    Join Date Mar 2007
    Location Wales
    Posts 675
    Organisation
    Independent
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    Why would you encourage people to vote for one half of the business party rather than the other?
    Why not? At least Obama has liberal policies.
    “Left wing, chicken wing, it don't make no difference to me.” - Woody Guthrie
  14. #14
    Join Date Feb 2006
    Location California
    Posts 520
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Why not? At least Obama has liberal policies.
    Yeah. Like putting more troops in Afghanistan, swearing alliegance to Israel, and invading Darfur to end "genocide" which would obviously lead to another war much like the catastrofuck in Iraq.

    Just a side note, liberal policies is not what us Leftists should aim for at all. Liberalism in the modern sense of the word here in the US just represents an illusion of more power for the people. The reality is that all that they offer us is scraps and that is all. If we want more, we cannot work within the system but must destory it completely.

    Liberalism, in whatever variety it might stand for, has always been the enemy of Communism.
  15. #15
    Join Date Mar 2007
    Location Wales
    Posts 675
    Organisation
    Independent
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    Yeah. Like putting more troops in Afghanistan, swearing alliegance to Israel, and invading Darfur to end "genocide" which would obviously lead to another war much like the catastrofuck in Iraq.
    Yeah. I'm not disputing any of this. But since a socialist party is unlikely to be elected, it is only common sense.
    “Left wing, chicken wing, it don't make no difference to me.” - Woody Guthrie
  16. #16
    Join Date Feb 2007
    Location The Imagination
    Posts 594
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Yeah. I'm not disputing any of this. But since a socialist party is unlikely to be elected, it is only common sense.
    "The socialists are unlikely, therefore vote for their opponents" is not only a non-sequiter, it's self-fulfilling.
    I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day. - Douglas Adams



    Political Compass: -9.62, -8.21
  17. #17
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 1,483
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    I would recomend either not voting at all in order to devalidate the so called "democratic" institutions. In the case of the U.S. I say one could also vote for some third party in order to undermine the two party system and the democratic party.

    Even though i live in the u.s. i can't vote because i live here ilegally so no voting is the default option for me
    [FONT=Arial Black]WAR IS PEACE!
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY!
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!
    [/FONT]

    -INGSOC slogans
  18. #18
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 4,520
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    I voted for option one.

    I fail to see how Obama is going to be significantly better than George W or McCain.
    He probably won't be significantly better, but he'll probably be somewhat better. He's supporting some things that are marginally pro-union that could be beneficial to labor organizing in the future. Some members here are cynical about it, but I think it remains the best option given how weak the left is on a national level.
    "delebo inquit hominem"

    "You are my creator, but I am your master.''
  19. #19
    Join Date Mar 2007
    Location Wales
    Posts 675
    Organisation
    Independent
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    "The socialists are unlikely, therefore vote for their opponents"
    Yeah, that's pretty much the logic behind it.

    Luckily for me though, I don't live in the US and will not have to vote in such shenanigans.
    “Left wing, chicken wing, it don't make no difference to me.” - Woody Guthrie
  20. #20
    Join Date Jul 2008
    Posts 244
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    I recommend not voting or how about a revolution? I thought the constitution was clear that if you have a dictatorship you should over throw it, I know they are elected but the system is stuck between 2 parties who hold very minor differences well maybe not so minor but the freedom of democratic choice is not there in a majority system.

    Revolt!

    hehe

    or vote Obama as voter turnout is already low and the large amounts of non voters has not caused changes to be made in the system.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 7th December 2004, 07:26
  2. Daniel De Leon - the American Marxist
    By Sensitive in forum Theory
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9th May 2003, 20:51
  3. your opinion in american policy on iraq
    By damn the capitalism in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12th March 2003, 08:58
  4. your opinion in american policy on iraq
    By damn the capitalism in forum Cultural
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12th March 2003, 06:59

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread