shes a bourgeois politician, woman or not. nothing is going to improve because a woman is president.
Results 1 to 20 of 25
WHY NO Hillary Clinton ?
I believe that women may be more adept at politics. Why not?
华乔
You just never give up!
shes a bourgeois politician, woman or not. nothing is going to improve because a woman is president.
I'd rather have an inept bourgeois politician in the White House than an adept one.
The adept ones are the most dangerous because they're the ones who know exactly how to promote the interests of their ruling class constituency.
Last edited by The Red Scare; 13th April 2008 at 00:38.
music for the Revolution...
http://www.soundclick.com/redscare
I hate to sound condescending - that is not at all my intent - but have you ever considered that she's a capitalist?!?! Woman or not, no bourgeois cappie's going to get my vote.
"take revolution seriously, but don't take yourself seriously" - May 1968
Why do you believe that women are more adept at politics?
I think this is just a troll.
Life is something worth dying for.
No, he just has trouble making his point in English.
She is in the universities of this, but her husband when the United States President. She spent in the White House
华乔
You just never give up!
She may know what she is doing, but that is useless to the lower class as long as she's supporting capitalism. At the very core of it, the reason leftists do not like Hilary is not because she is a women or because she isn't qualified. It is because we are opposed to capitalism, and politicians such as Hilary support it.
I hope that clears it up for you.
I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
Collective Bruce Banner shit
FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath
Oh my bad, I saw the Blog Entries: 1 and thought that it said post count. My apologies.
That's a really poor way of seeing things. You want the least qualified and worst possible politician to be elected because you think only then will the working class rise up? I understand that "good politicians" (as oxymoronic as that may be) only put a Happy Face on capitalism, but wanting a bad president is not the way to go about things. Honestly, if you believe that capitalism truly and inherently is oppressive no matter the politician, then it shouldn't matter to you or the working class who gets elected.
Last edited by Everyday Anarchy; 13th April 2008 at 02:42.
Life is something worth dying for.
Politics is a matter of opinion has indicated that she might be able to choose the road of the centre-left, because it is a radical green than red. As a female, she was a disadvantage. I am unfair. She is a qualified politician. People I change direction is to please rethink.
华乔
You just never give up!
Actually in almost every way imaginable Hillary is a rightist. Under the Clinton's leadership the democrats have become a 2nd Republican party. Now They receive more from defense contractors than even the Republicans.
Clinton is dispicalbe in every way. She was in a key position in the Dem party and was a far more important Bush-Iraq enabler than Lieberman. The media went after Lieberman as a lightningrod strategy.
Hillary is a rightist . Nobody has taken the Corporate Dems so far to the right than the Clintons. In fact they have taken the dems so far to the right that it is easy to overlook how far the democrats have moved to the right since say the 1960s. WHILE IT IS IMPORATANT NOT TO BE NAIVE ABOUT LIBERALISM, IT IS JUST IMPORTANT TO CONFLATE LIBERALISM OF TWO DIFFERENT HISTORICAL PERIODS. This ahisorical conflation, represents cynicism, and is historically inacurate.
I thought sunfarstar was banned along time ago for trolling, I guess we kept him/her along for the laughs.
She's pro-capitalist. She voted for the Iraq War and is pro-gun control. Among many other things. Why should we vote for her just because she has a different set of genitalia than the usual American President?
And when Marx says, 'Hitherto the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways', what that 'hitherto' means is not a renunciation of theory and that all we need to do is wade in with our fists and there will be no more need for thought. This idea is in fact fascist, and it would be grossly unjust to Marx to impute such views on him.
--Theodor Adorno, 'On Theory and Practice'
Moved to Opposing Ideologies.
Did you hear about the rose that grew from a crack in the concrete?
Proving nature's law is wrong it learned to walk with out having feet.
Funny it seems, but by keeping its dreams, it learned to breathe fresh air.
Long live the rose that grew from concrete when no one else ever cared.
Back in Politics again. Why?
And when Marx says, 'Hitherto the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways', what that 'hitherto' means is not a renunciation of theory and that all we need to do is wade in with our fists and there will be no more need for thought. This idea is in fact fascist, and it would be grossly unjust to Marx to impute such views on him.
--Theodor Adorno, 'On Theory and Practice'
Good president = Bad for the people.
Bad president = Good for the people.
Bush has managed to radicalise a large segment of the American population, while the liberals would rather create some sort of stability again.
We unbanned him a while ago.
Hilldawg = cappie.
Hillary is like our version of Hu Jintao or Zemin.
"The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
Workers of the World Unite!" -Karl Marx
"The dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of suppressing the oppressors, cannot result merely in an expansion of democracy. Simultaneously with an immense expansion of democracy, which for the first time becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. " -Vladimir Lenin
"The People's democratic dictatorship needs the leadership of the working class. For it is only the working class that is most far-sighted, most selfless and most thoroughly revolutionary. The entire history of revolution proves that without the leadership of the working class revolution fails and that with the leadership of the working class revolution triumphs." -Mao Zedong
1979-1990 Britain suggests not. The fact that she's a woman doesn't detract from the fact that she's a bourgeois politician.
