Thread: Controlling Revolutionary Anger

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 121
    Rep Power 11

    Default Controlling Revolutionary Anger

    The large internal problem today within revolutions is anger. We all want capitalism to end, all of us revolutionaries. We all want to stand up and tell them to screw off or else.

    But, internally, within ourselves, our aims are typically the same as one another's. That's where that element of comradery lends it's hand. The in-fighting withing the left works against ending capitalism.

    Now, capitalism is the most advanced society we have. Why? Production, that's why. With capitalism, we are now capable of producing more than we were ever able to produce before. Are any of you aware of how much food we can now produce that goes to waste simply because it cannot be sold.

    We have more available now, with farming machinery, than ever before. And that is what capitalism has introduced : large scale production.

    Now, what about us anarchist-communists? We believe that freedom should not be spent in one single dime, on one day, in one revolution. But really, freedom is a state of mind, where personal struggles and woes don't exist. All things are always personal, and denying that, it pushes these issues under the water where it just bobs up somewhere else in our mind unexpectedly.

    I guess what I'm saying is that, well, we shouldn't be communists because our bosses aren't paying enough, but that we should be anarchist comrades and communists simply because we have bosses.

    And that when communism arrives, it should come naturally to that specific generation of people whom it was borne to. In 20, 50, 70, 200 years, it doesn't matter.

    In many ways, communism is just another ace in our deck against authority. Speaking of which, it would be pretty fun to see a communist playing card deck. Hehehe. Marx could be the king, lenin could be the queen.
    ... and all the kings men could not put him back together again.
  2. #2
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Location England
    Posts 108
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    In my opinion communism (as per Marx and Engels) is a process of socio-economic inevitibility.

    The revolution which many crave rabidly for will be the product of a enormous chain of smaller reforms pushed for by those who would be revolutionaries that started decades ago that will over the long term improve conditions, gradually making a fairer state.

    The revolution is cultural, when one day we wake up and realise we're there, that the Marxist utopia has occured.

    When this happens, be it in 10 or 10,000 years it will be worth it.

    The function of revolutionaries is to nurse this process along by fighting the injustices of the current system, gradually applying the pressure that will change the world like the technique by which one curves a bar of steel.

    Sudden revolutionary changes are uncontrolled, as such they are usually flawed and must be imposed with great force, like a car crash. In the long term they cause damage rather than positive change.

    It isn't so much a question of controlling revolutionary anger by repressing it as it is remembering why you are angry. Flawed changes make flawed systems these are in turn the cause of revolutionary anger.

    One must remember to consider the consequences of bringing about institutional change even as they enact it.
    Last edited by Dyslexia! Well I Never!; 5th March 2008 at 23:36.
    I am Dyslexic. Thank you Precy & Dr. W. Pringle Morgan for Congential Word Blindness!
    It's not a matter of whether the war is not real, or if it is, Victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.

    Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance[…] In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation.

    The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over [an enemy] but to keep the very structure of society intact.
    Loosely attributed to - Eric Arthur Blair (George Orwell)

Similar Threads

  1. is the market controlling human development
    By Dr Mindbender in forum Learning
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10th December 2007, 21:08
  2. If the Soviet Union had not been so controlling... - Do you
    By Rebelde para Siempre in forum History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 7th May 2003, 12:59
  3. Anger and Pain
    By CommieBastard in forum Cultural
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26th October 2001, 22:25

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts