Thread: American Presidential Voting

Results 1 to 14 of 14

  1. #1
    Join Date Feb 2008
    Posts 4
    Rep Power 0

    Default American Presidential Voting

    I have been struggling with the decision of voting in the upcoming primary in my state. Obviously no candidate will offer the views I have as a blooming Marxist (specifically focusing on Comandante Guevara's views on the concept). I know that any candidate will always work toward United States imperialism (as it is best for the country they will be running). At this time I am leaning toward voting, and with that vote using it on Barack Obama. Unfortunately, my original choice of candidate Jon Ewdwards has dropped out (he held the most passionate and reform filled views on dealing with the country's poor). I feel that it wouldn't prove anything or serve a purpose to not vote considering the country will move on unaffected. As long as my vote could possibly improve working conditions for middle class and poor I seem it worth voting. Any opinions on this situation as it is my first chance to vote on a presidential decision, let alone my first voting oppurtunity as a begining socialist.
  2. #2
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Location Earth
    Posts 8,925
    Organisation
    NEET
    Rep Power 86

    Default

    Obama had called for the bombing of Pakistan, among other things: http://freepeoplesmovement.org/fpm/page.php?336

    Originally Posted by The linked article
    The Democrats have repeatedly made clear that they are not "anti-war", despite the fact that their base among the workers and farmers of the country are. Instead, the Democrats represent the same rich ruling elite as the Republicans, and in the end, those elite are the only people they answer to.

    To make any real change in society, and to bring imperialist wars to an end once and for all, we must break from the Democratic Party and take independent, revolutionary action.
    "Getting a job, finding a mate, having a place to live, finding a creative outlet. Life is a war of attrition. You have to stay active on all fronts. It's one thing after another. I've tried to control a chaotic universe. And it's a losing battle. But I can't let go. I've tried, but I can't." - Harvey Pekar


  3. #3
    Join Date May 2006
    Location WESTERN USA
    Posts 2,626
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    i don't think is worth it. might as well do a write in.
    we need more revolutions and less "isms"
  4. #4
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 1,483
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    I on the other hand, think you should vote, just to keep republicans out of power.
    [FONT=Arial Black]WAR IS PEACE!
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY!
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!
    [/FONT]

    -INGSOC slogans
  5. #5
    Join Date Aug 2006
    Location New York-Uptown
    Posts 414
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    I on the other hand, think you should vote, just to keep republicans out of power.
    Even if Republicans were "out of power" the World wouldn't see it as missing a section of politics for the simple fact that the Democrats would maintain Republican policies. (Which are Capitalist policies)
    "The task devolving on Communists is to convince the backward elements, to work among them, and not to fence themselves off from them with artificial and childishly "Left" slogans." V.I. Lenin
  6. #6
    Join Date May 2007
    Posts 4,669
    Rep Power 82

    Default

    I see nothing wrong with voting in emergency situations. The CPUSA encouraged people to vote for the Democrats against the isolationist Republicans (Who refused to intervene in Europe) in 1936 and 1940. Besides that though, the Democrats are marginally better than the Republicans. Debs said "The Democrats are the small capitalists and the Republicans are the big capitalists" at one point, "but they are still both capitalist" he stressed. So if you do vote, it should only be to make the worser option lose.
    * h0m0revolutionary: "neo-liberalism can deliver healthy children, it can educate them, it can feed them, it can clothe them and leave them fully contented."
    * rooster: "Supporting [anti-imperialism] is reactionary. How is any nation supposed to stand up [to] the might of the US anyway?"
    * nizan: "Fuck your education is empowerment bullshit, education is alienation, nothing more. You indulge in a dying prestige for a role in a bureaucratic spectacle deserving of nothing beyond contempt."
    * Alexios: "To the Board Administration: Ismail [...] needs to be eliminated from this forum."
  7. #7
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Location San Diego for now
    Posts 410
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Voting gives validity to the system we which to destroy. I completely disagree with voting. I see it as completely useless. But sadly, when it comes down to it. I would much rather have a democrat than a republican in office in regards to the situation which plagues the poor and workers.. But I also take the view that the only thing that the democrats will give to the American population is to throw them some bones to keep them happy and thus cause the revolutionary potential to be delayed. While republican actions and policies create a great fury within the workers and if we as revolutionaries were able to harvest this power than I believe we would have a much better shot at getting the gears to real change starting. Revolution is sadly not a viable option in America or other western nations yet. It simple does not have the fury or anger in which our revolutionary message would appeal. So...... fuck voting its stupid.
    Israel sucks ass

    Please excuse my spelling, I suck ass at spelling. Sorry.

    Believe it or not, you can read it.
    I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit plcae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?
  8. #8
    Join Date Oct 2006
    Location Western US
    Posts 637
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    In the US the working class vote carries very little political weight. It may have a small impact by giving a nudge in the final decision by indicating where the current attitude of the working class lies, but in the end it is the votes of the bourgeoisie and their representatives that hold the real power. From nominating their candidate done by delegates to the actually presidential election through the Electoral Collage. In the end our vote really has no real purpose other then to give us the illusion of having political power.
    The amount of poverty and suffering required for the emergence of a Rockefeller, and the amount of depravity that the accumulation of a fortune of such magnitude entails, are left out of the picture, and it is not always possible to make the people in general see this. - Ernesto Che Guevara

    Fate is simply a future that you didn't try to change.
  9. #9
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 8
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    In the US the working class vote carries very little political weight. It may have a small impact by giving a nudge in the final decision by indicating where the current attitude of the working class lies, but in the end it is the votes of the bourgeoisie and their representatives that hold the real power. From nominating their candidate done by delegates to the actually presidential election through the Electoral Collage. In the end our vote really has no real purpose other then to give us the illusion of having political power.
    I agree with this, to some extent.

    Sometimes I fail to see any real difference between Republicans and Democrats. If you ask me, it's all much the same. There is no real opposing party that goes against the current direction the US is headed in.
    Last edited by Cold; 13th February 2008 at 15:28.
  10. #10
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Location Earth
    Posts 8,925
    Organisation
    NEET
    Rep Power 86

    Default

    We shouldn't approach this as a lifestyle question. Whether or not you vote as an individual is pretty unimportant.

    But we communists are the most class conscious workers. It's our job to do what we can to elevate the consciousness of our brothers and sisters. It's ridiculous for us to talk about revolution and throwing out the capitalists and destroying their state, then going to vote for one of two capitalist candidates, in a capitalist election, to decide who will sit atop the capitalist state. We need to work to break our fellow workers free of the sham of capitalist "democracy" and especially the capitalist Democratic Party.

    I see nothing wrong with voting in emergency situations. The CPUSA encouraged people to vote for the Democrats against the isolationist Republicans (Who refused to intervene in Europe) in 1936 and 1940. Besides that though, the Democrats are marginally better than the Republicans. Debs said "The Democrats are the small capitalists and the Republicans are the big capitalists" at one point, "but they are still both capitalist" he stressed. So if you do vote, it should only be to make the worser option lose.
    Only liberals look at the "worser option." Lesser-evilism has nothing to do with communism.

    Communists look at class forces. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are capitalist parties, and workers must not only break free from them but oppose them.

    Reformists and traitors of all sorts have used the "emergency situation" excuse for years. It's bogus. The CPUSA has been calling every election in recent history "the most important election ever" to excuse their backing of the capitalist Democrats.

    And even this liberal notion that "things are a little better under the Democrats" is bogus. Welfare was gutted, Viet Nam and Korea were bombed and invaded, nuclear weapons were used, etc., under presidents belonging to the Democratic Party.

    The Democrats serve as a kind of cushion for the capitalists to fall back on. Its easier to push through all sorts of reactionary shit when they're in office because so many people are fooled into believing "they're a little better."

    Workers need nothing short of revolution, and we need to break with the "other party of war" to make that happen.
    "Getting a job, finding a mate, having a place to live, finding a creative outlet. Life is a war of attrition. You have to stay active on all fronts. It's one thing after another. I've tried to control a chaotic universe. And it's a losing battle. But I can't let go. I've tried, but I can't." - Harvey Pekar


  11. #11
    Join Date Jan 2008
    Posts 37
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    If you don't vote, don't complain.
    [FONT=Century Gothic]Information wants to be free[/FONT]
  12. #12
    Join Date Aug 2006
    Location New York-Uptown
    Posts 414
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    If you don't vote, don't complain.
    That seems to be completely more applicable to Bourgeois reformists than Communists in the sense that Communists aren't trying to "better" the system, we're trying to overthrow it.
    "The task devolving on Communists is to convince the backward elements, to work among them, and not to fence themselves off from them with artificial and childishly "Left" slogans." V.I. Lenin
  13. #13
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Location Earth
    Posts 8,925
    Organisation
    NEET
    Rep Power 86

    Default

    Exactly.
    '
    And like George Carlin put it "where's the logic in that? If you vote, and you elect dishonest, incompetent politicians, and they get into office and screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You voted them in. You caused the problem. You have no right to complain.

    "I, on the other hand, who did not vote -- who in fact did not even leave the house on Election Day -- am in no way responsible for that these politicians have done and have every right to complain about the mess that you created."

    and..

    'You know what the difference is between you going to the polls and jerking off? When I get finished masturbating, I'll have a little something to show for it."

    Hey, if we're going to use flawed logic, let's at least have a laugh.
    "Getting a job, finding a mate, having a place to live, finding a creative outlet. Life is a war of attrition. You have to stay active on all fronts. It's one thing after another. I've tried to control a chaotic universe. And it's a losing battle. But I can't let go. I've tried, but I can't." - Harvey Pekar


  14. #14
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 2,306
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    If you don't vote, don't complain.
    Shut up.

    Voting in Bourgeois elections as an action endorses a.) the process whereby the oppressors of the proletariat are chosen and b.) the governments selected by that process and therefore c.) the heinous and brutal crimes that WILL be committed by whichever reactionary happens to get elected.
    "The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.

    Workers of the World Unite!" -Karl Marx

    "The dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of suppressing the oppressors, cannot result merely in an expansion of democracy. Simultaneously with an immense expansion of democracy, which for the first time becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. " -Vladimir Lenin

    "The People's democratic dictatorship needs the leadership of the working class. For it is only the working class that is most far-sighted, most selfless and most thoroughly revolutionary. The entire history of revolution proves that without the leadership of the working class revolution fails and that with the leadership of the working class revolution triumphs." -Mao Zedong

Similar Threads

  1. Presidential Death Tolls
    By jake williams in forum History
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10th February 2008, 10:05
  2. US Presidential Elections.
    By apathy maybe in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 19th March 2007, 12:10
  3. Guards under presidential control
    By emma_goldman in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31st August 2006, 00:57
  4. Presidential Prayer
    By Ownthink in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 8th August 2005, 07:43
  5. Presidential Advice
    By Disgustipated in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 23rd February 2003, 21:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread