Thread: Preliminary considerations in marxism (no flaming)

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date Dec 2007
    Posts 13
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    hi. over the holidays some professor had assigned my class to formulate a paper which addresses the following questions:

    1. what it means to be a Marxist
    2. the issue of whether or not there is an element of Karl Marx's philosophy which limits the person from achieving a full sense of being Marxist.

    i guess i'll start with giving my opinion ---
    on the former, it wouldn't be enough to say that a person is marxist merely because he or she takes to belief the theories formulated by the man.

    though i have read the manifesto, german ideology and das kapital, my background on marxism is in need of improvement. your answers to these inquiries would be much appreciated!
  2. #2
    Join Date Dec 2001
    Location Glasgow,Scotland
    Posts 4,329
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    Marx said he was not a Marxist. There were so many people using his name to bless their own work. He would preffered to be called a scientific socialist.As far as limits go Engels admitted that most of their work had been on the base rather than the superstructure of society. There is no formal limits in the subjective sense from the Manifesto we have "The free development of all is the condition for the free development of each"

    On the objective side we have the basicaly common sense idea that people are products of their own times.
    Man's dearest possession is life, and since it is given to him to live but once.He must so live that dying he can say, all my life and all my strength have been given to the greatest cause in the world, the liberation of mankind
    Ostrovski

    Muriel Spark:

    If I had my life to live over again I should form the habit of nightly composing myself to thoughts of death. I would practice, as it were, the remembrance of death. There is no other practice which so intensifies life. Death, when it approaches, ought not to take one by surprise. It should be part of the full expectancy of life. Without an ever-present sense of death life is insipid. You might as well live on the whites of eggs.

Similar Threads

  1. Monopolies - Price considerations
    By Stormin Norman in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12th November 2002, 02:15
  2. Considerations on the "human nature"
    By El Che in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 16th January 2002, 13:37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts