The word ‘national’ was not intended to imply that this body arrogated to itself any authority outside its own region; such committees called themselves indifferently ‘national’ or ‘revolutionary’. In their spontaneous origin, in their composition, in their sense of responsibility, in their efficient organisation of food supplies and of civil order, in the restraint they exercised over the wilder elements among the youth, in the wisdom with which so many of them handled the problem of Soviet troops, and, not least, in their striking resemblance at so many points to the soviets or councils of workers’, peasants’ and soldiers’ deputies which sprang up in Russia in the 1905 revolution and again in February 1917, these committees, a network of which now extended over the whole of Hungary, were remarkably uniform. They were at once organs of insurrection - the coming together of delegates elected by factories and universities, mine and Army units - and organs of popular self-government, which the armed people trusted. As such they enjoyed tremendous authority, and it is no exaggeration to say that until the Soviet attack of November 4 the real power in the country lay in their hands.
Hehe.
No, bez obzira, ne vidim ništa "elitistički" u tome da ovo vozanje kroz margine intelektualnog svemira unatraženog u vremenu i smislu vidim kao spuštanje na "niži nivo".
Iznio sam dovoljno činjenica da se zainteresovani i manje upućeni ne pokolebaju i zbune pred vašim nakaradnim izjavama. Dalje, ako se zanmaju, mogu sami.
