Thread: Jena Six

Results 21 to 40 of 48

  1. #21
    Join Date Sep 2004
    Location New York City
    Posts 1,477
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, National Organizer
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Originally posted by A Suvorov@September 27, 2007 03:55 am
    While I am repulsed by the actions of the guilty parties for their part in displaying the nooses, their actions in no way excuse the beating of the one kid by the Gang of Six.
    First of all, do you have ANY fucking clue what the full story is? Where did you get the synopsis you are using? Fucking FOX news? This is worse than the average bourgeois press as far as the amount of the story you are telling.

    How about the fact that the white kids assaulted a Black youth after the noose incident, and the only punishment they recieved was probation and "they had to apologize." That's a little bit different from the 26 years in prison they changed the Black kid, Michael Bell with huh?

    Well! Maybe that will teach those Blacks, the "Gang of Six" (notice this reference to Black youth as a "gang") to follow the rule of law, huh?

    Your posts are so fucking racist it makes me sick. At least you're not alone! You've got the KKK behind you, standing up for the rule of law.
    Kasama Project
    kasamaproject.org
  2. #22
    Join Date Sep 2004
    Location New York City
    Posts 1,477
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, National Organizer
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    I would like to post this article from Revolution that tells the full story of what is happening in Jena:

    The Story of the Jena 6

    by Alice Woodward
    Revolution Newspaper

    It is a late summer day in September 2006, the beginning of the school year, in the small town of Jena, Louisiana. A Black student ASKS FOR PERMISSION to sit beneath the shade tree in front of the high school. A tree known as a “WHITES-ONLY TREE.”

    The principal says they can sit wherever they want, so they do.

    The next morning when students come to school, three NOOSES are hanging from the tree.

    Tina Jones, the mother of Bryant Purvis, one of the Jena 6, told Revolution:

    “To Black people that is offensive because you know over the years Black people were hung in trees. So I mean we felt like the white people were saying, ‘Well if you sit under this tree, we’re going to hang you.’ That’s how us, as Black people felt, even though the white people said it was a prank. How could it be a prank when something like that was done to Black people over the years?”

    After dozens of Black students courageously stand under the tree in a defiant act of protest, the principal and superintendent bring in District Attorney Reed Walters and local police officers to an all-school assembly. The DA threatens Black students, telling them that if they do anything else about the nooses: “I can take away your lives with a stroke of my pen.” Police officers are stationed in the halls of the school that week.

    Meanwhile, no real punishment for the students who HUNG THE NOOSES. The school board steps in to prevent them from getting expelled and they only get a three-day suspension.

    On November 30, 2006, the main school building is mysteriously burned to the ground. That weekend when Robert Bailey, a 17-year-old Black student, tries to attend a school dance, he is punched in the face, knocked on the ground and attacked by a group of white youth. Only one of the white students is arrested—and then only given probation and asked to apologize.

    The night after that, a white youth pulls a gun on a group of Black youth. A Black youth wrestles the gun away to prevent the white youth from using it. And for this he is arrested and charged with theft.

    The following Monday a fight breaks out at school. A white student, Justin Barker, goes to the hospital for a few hours and then attends a school ring ceremony that night.

    The next day, December 4, six Black students—Robert Bailey Junior, Theo Shaw, Carwin Jones, Bryant Purvis, Mychal Bell, and an unidentified minor—are arrested and charged with attempted second-degree murder and conspiracy to commit attempted second degree murder. Outrageously high bail is set for each of them, ranging from $70,000-$138,000, and most of them end up in jail for months. Mychal Bell is still in jail.

    Like a scene from the Jim Crow South, Mychal Bell is tried on June 25-28 by an all-white jury, in a courtroom run by a white judge. The prosecutor calls 16 witnesses, mostly white students. The court-appointed defense attorney calls NO WITNESSES ON BELL’S BEHALF. The DA argues that the tennis shoes on Bell’s feet were a “dangerous weapon.” Mychal Bell is convicted of two felonies: aggravated second-degree battery and conspiracy to commit aggravated second-degree battery.

    On July 26, the U.S. Department of Justice hosts a “community forum” in Jena, run by Lewis Chapman, assistant special agent in charge of the New Orleans FBI office and U.S. Attorney Donald Washington from the U.S. Justice Department. Discussing how all this has been handled by the authorities, Washington states that “all of their procedures were ‘regular’ and not ‘irregular.’” In effect, he says six Black youth should go to prison for standing up to racism, that white supremacy is the REGULAR workings of this system.

    AT EVERY TURN, city and federal officials, the police and courts have stepped in to officially enforce white supremacy and insure the prosecution and persecution of these Black youth.

    The Struggle to Free the Jena 6


    On July 31, 300 people come from all over the country to rally in support of the Jena 6 when Mychal Bell is scheduled to be sentenced. The weekend before, the school administration removes the “whites-only” tree.

    In August, a new legal team from Monroe, Louisiana, steps forward to represent Mychal Bell and handle his appeal, pro bono. Bell’s sentencing is postponed and the team files a number of motions—that Bell did not receive a fair trial, that his constitutional rights were violated, that the convictions should be thrown out, and that a new trial be held or the charges dropped.

    At an August 24 court hearing, family members and others step forward to testify that they will ensure Bell will be in the care of the community if he is released on bail. But the judge summarily dismisses this and denies bond. He declares Bell a “danger” to the community, citing a so-called “criminal record” of minor offenses. And then in a blatant racist insult, he compares the Black community to a “fence erected around the cattle” and criticizes them for not erecting this fence around Mychal Bell earlier.

    Students at Jena High continue to resist. On August 28, eight or nine students go to school wearing t-shirts that read, “Free the Jena 6.” Again the hammer comes down: The principal gets on the loudspeakers and announces that the t-shirts cannot be worn because they “offend” some people. The t-shirts are officially banned.

    *****

    All that set the stage for this month. On September 4, Mychal Bell's lawyers presented arguments before the 28th Judicial Court showing numerous violations of constitutional rights during Bell's original trial. Judge J.P. Mauffray, Jr. denied every appeal by Bell's lawyers except for one. He did however throw out the conspiracy conviction, on the grounds that Mychal Bell should not have been prosecuted as an adult on that charge. But he did NOT overturn Bell's conviction, as an adult, on second-degree battery charges. At that point, Bell still faced the possibility of 15 years in prison.

    Then, on September 14, in response to an emergency appeal by Bell's lawyers and in the face of a mushrooming nationwide movement to free the Jena 6, Louisiana's Third Circuit Court of Appeals threw out Mychal Bell's conviction of second-degree battery, on the grounds that he should not have been tried as an adult on this charge either. This marked an important victory, but it is still very partial and initial. As we go to press, the D.A. has vowed to appeal to higher courts to re-instate the adult charges, Bell remains in jail, and the rest of the 6 still face very serious charges. And even this initial victory only came about due to the courageous stand of people in Jena and the growing nationwide political movement to free the Jena 6. The struggle to completely free the Jena 6 and force the system to drop ALL charges is far from over and must continue to grow, by leaps and bounds.
    Kasama Project
    kasamaproject.org
  3. #23
    Join Date Jul 2006
    Posts 44
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Red Heretic+September 27, 2007 06:26 am--> (Red Heretic @ September 27, 2007 06:26 am)
    A Suvorov
    @September 27, 2007 03:55 am
    While I am repulsed by the actions of the guilty parties for their part in displaying the nooses, their actions in no way excuse the beating of the one kid by the Gang of Six.
    First of all, do you have ANY fucking clue what the full story is? Where did you get the synopsis you are using? Fucking FOX news? This is worse than the average bourgeois press as far as the amount of the story you are telling.

    How about the fact that the white kids assaulted a Black youth after the noose incident, and the only punishment they recieved was probation and "they had to apologize." That's a little bit different from the 26 years in prison they changed the Black kid, Michael Bell with huh?

    Well! Maybe that will teach those Blacks, the "Gang of Six" (notice this reference to Black youth as a "gang") to follow the rule of law, huh?

    Your posts are so fucking racist it makes me sick. At least you're not alone! You've got the KKK behind you, standing up for the rule of law.[/b]
    Regarding the '26 years' that Bell was potentially on the hook for: maybe, just MAYBE it might have something to do with the other FOUR incidents he has been charged with over the recent years, all of them associated with aggravated violence?

    I'm just going to chalk this whole Gang of Six incident to the 'OJ Factor'- they might not go to prison this time, maybe not the next time- but you mark my words, sooner or later one or more of them is going to screw up (probably repeatedly) and WILL eventually have to walk the walk in the Big House.

    Think about it- you get bitten by a dog enough times and sooner or later you're going to have to do something about it. It doesn't matter whether it's a white dog or a black dog, or what have you; violent is violent, period.

    And again, what happens when you take out the Race Card in this whole event? You are left with exactly what need to be focussed on- the Gang of Six versus Lone White Kid. Think about it- six on one. That alone indicates premeditation of some degree, or perhaps even a full-blown conspiracy to 'get even with someone'.

    I do wonder, though, if the Black Community (as a whole) is trying to frame this whole 'noose incident' under the auspices of the Hate Crime laws- if so, they are sealing the fates of the Gang of Six, for what else COULD their attack be considered as if not a hate crime? I wonder if that's what is waiting in the wings, or if the whole incident will be a wash if the Six involved are threatened with being charged under those Hate Crime laws- which carry stiffer penalties than run-of-the-mill charges. Remember, Hate Crimes work both ways.

    Despite what you may think, I am not basing any of this argument on racial prejudice AT ALL. If anything, I'm simply trying to illustrate that the issue at hand is, in fact, two SEPARATE issues- one being, obviously, the criminal actions taken by both whites and blacks during the time span of the collective actions; the other being the exacerbation of racial tension by grandstanding agitators trying introduce the Race Card as the overriding factor. Certainly, as I have agreed with in previous posts, Jena has had racial problems in the past, but the posturing of 'outsiders' is only making things worse.

    In other words, this entire media circus falls under the heading of Godwin's law of internet discussions: if allowed to continue to excess, any online discussion will result in one side or the other declaring the other to be 'worse than Hitler'- at which point that side has declared surender as they can produce nothing more than that to argue with.

    It is the same for this issue: it's already to the point where the Race Card is being played unnecessarily; by doing so, the Black community has declared itself impotent by virtue of not having anything worthwhile to fight with. It is a sad thing, too, because they have so many more issues to be concerned with that would benefit the greater good than to expend all of it's emotional capital on what may very well be a pointless defense of these violent youths. (I repeat, sooner or later one or more of the Six will screw up and it will be Game Over as they will then be charged adults and finally held accountable for their actions. Mark your calendars.)

    (Oh, and by the way, advocating for 'The Law' is in no way a monopoly of the KKK- I might remind you that a great portion of the KKK are very likely involved in illegal activities themselves! And, as a parting thought- since you do not advocate for the law, I suppose it would be okay for someone- anyone- to perpetrate crimes of the most heinous sort against you or your family? Since you don't believe in following the law, certainly you wouldn't report it, but instead go out for revenge and/or satisfaction on your own? And suppose you DID exact personal revenge- what then? Do both families call it even and you go out for a beer with the original criminal's family, calling it 'even'? I think not. Remember, without the law we are left with our only legal system of 'an eye for an eye'- under which soon the entire world would be blind.)
    <span style=\'color:red\'><span style=\'color:red\'>Communist Party, USA</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Communist League</span></span>
  4. #24
    Join Date Jun 2007
    Posts 143
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    And again, what happens when you take out the Race Card in this whole event? You are left with exactly what need to be focussed on- the Gang of Six versus Lone White Kid. Think about it- six on one. That alone indicates premeditation of some degree, or perhaps even a full-blown conspiracy to &#39;get even with someone&#39;.
    YOUR not taking the race card out six beat up ONE "WHITE" sounds like race is being called apon.

    I do wonder, though, if the Black Community (as a whole) is trying to frame this whole &#39;noose incident&#39; under the auspices of the Hate Crime laws- if so, they are sealing the fates of the Gang of Six, for what else COULD their attack be considered as if not a hate crime? I wonder if that&#39;s what is waiting in the wings, or if the whole incident will be a wash if the Six involved are threatened with being charged under those Hate Crime laws- which carry stiffer penalties than run-of-the-mill charges. Remember, Hate Crimes work both ways.
    please explain to me how beating up some racists is a hate crime. and the &#39;noose incident&#39; THEY WERE THREATING TO LYNC THE BLACK KIDS. your marginalizing the actions of the white supremacist.

    Despite what you may think, I am not basing any of this argument on racial prejudice AT ALL. If anything, I&#39;m simply trying to illustrate that the issue at hand is, in fact, two SEPARATE issues- one being, obviously, the criminal actions taken by both whites and blacks during the time span of the collective actions; the other being the exacerbation of racial tension by grandstanding agitators trying introduce the Race Card as the overriding factor. Certainly, as I have agreed with in previous posts, Jena has had racial problems in the past, but the posturing of &#39;outsiders&#39; is only making things worse.
    Then what the hell are you arguing, THERE NOT TWO SEPARATE ISSUES. don&#39;t you think its funny that fights happen all the time between WHITE students and they hardly get in to trouble... but when a black beats up a white they get 26 years? That should like the RACISM to me.

    It is the same for this issue: it&#39;s already to the point where the Race Card is being played unnecessarily; by doing so, the Black community has declared itself impotent by virtue of not having anything worthwhile to fight with. It is a sad thing, too, because they have so many more issues to be concerned with that would benefit the greater good than to expend all of it&#39;s emotional capital on what may very well be a pointless defense of these violent youths. (I repeat, sooner or later one or more of the Six will screw up and it will be Game Over as they will then be charged adults and finally held accountable for their actions. Mark your calendars.)
    unnecessarily race card...? they FUCKING THREATEN TO LYNC THEM. violent youths... your such a racist the poor white kid geting beat up by the evil gang of black people. and why will they screw up later? tell me&#33; why?

    (Oh, and by the way, advocating for &#39;The Law&#39; is in no way a monopoly of the KKK- I might remind you that a great portion of the KKK are very likely involved in illegal activities themselves&#33; And, as a parting thought- since you do not advocate for the law, I suppose it would be okay for someone- anyone- to perpetrate crimes of the most heinous sort against you or your family? Since you don&#39;t believe in following the law, certainly you wouldn&#39;t report it, but instead go out for revenge and/or satisfaction on your own? And suppose you DID exact personal revenge- what then? Do both families call it even and you go out for a beer with the original criminal&#39;s family, calling it &#39;even&#39;? I think not. Remember, without the law we are left with our only legal system of &#39;an eye for an eye&#39;- under which soon the entire world would be blind.)
    Your advocation of the &#39;law&#39; is based on racist arguements, hints the referance to the KKK. and yes the KKK breaks the laws... but tell me if a black mans kills a white man does he really get the same punishment as if it were vice versa. NO&#33; so your advocation of &#39;the law&#39; is pointless and just shows your own racist views. and yes if anyone in my family did something like this i would gladly beat them up myself. not for revenge but for anti-racist action. and who cares about their legal system anyways it was set up by a bunch of rich white men.

    hopefully you will get restrict because your clearly not a communist or even a leftist, but instead a liberal asshole with racists tendencies
  5. #25
    Join Date Sep 2004
    Location New York City
    Posts 1,477
    Organisation
    Kasama Project, National Organizer
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Originally posted by A Suvorov@September 28, 2007 02:00 am
    Regarding the &#39;26 years&#39; that Bell was potentially on the hook for: maybe, just MAYBE it might have something to do with the other FOUR incidents he has been charged with over the recent years, all of them associated with aggravated violence?

    I&#39;m just going to chalk this whole Gang of Six incident to the &#39;OJ Factor&#39;- they might not go to prison this time, maybe not the next time- but you mark my words, sooner or later one or more of them is going to screw up (probably repeatedly) and WILL eventually have to walk the walk in the Big House.


    Oh, well if a boy in high school has been in other fights, that makes it perfectly fine to virtually lynch him&#33; How about we throw every 16 year old that has been in 4 or more fights into prison for 26 years?

    And furthermore, why would a Black youth who faces constant racism and the threat of being lynched get into fights anyway? I can&#39;t imagine.


    Think about it- you get bitten by a dog enough times and sooner or later you&#39;re going to have to do something about it.
    Yeah, let&#39;s deal with that dog/nigger.

    And again, what happens when you take out the Race Card in this whole event?
    What happens when you take the "Race Card" out of the lynching of Emmett Till, (a 14 year old Black boy who whistled at a white girl and was chopped into pieces and thrown in a river)?

    What happens when you take the "Sex Card" out of the millions of women who will be raped this year?

    What happens when you take the essence of something out of anything?

    You&#39;re left with a fucking lie&#33;
    Kasama Project
    kasamaproject.org
  6. #26
    Join Date Oct 2006
    Location Western US
    Posts 637
    Rep Power 12

    Default

    No offense A Suvorov but you&#39;re faith in the bourgeois state is disgusting. While some laws are beneficial to the people there are (many) that are not, they&#39;re only purpose is to defend bourgeois interests and property rights, and because of this it is a joke to say that the law gives equal protection or equal treatment.
    The amount of poverty and suffering required for the emergence of a Rockefeller, and the amount of depravity that the accumulation of a fortune of such magnitude entails, are left out of the picture, and it is not always possible to make the people in general see this. - Ernesto Che Guevara

    Fate is simply a future that you didn't try to change.
  7. #27
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location England
    Posts 8,376
    Rep Power 74

    Default

    Originally posted by A Suvorov@September 28, 2007 02:00 am
    (Oh, and by the way, advocating for &#39;The Law&#39; is in no way a monopoly of the KKK- I might remind you that a great portion of the KKK are very likely involved in illegal activities themselves&#33;
    Were you born this stupid or was it the result of multiple head wounds? You&#39;re using the same fucking rhetoric as the Klan in your defence of this travesty, they are also claiming to be standing up for the "rule of law" and, of course, "teh inosent wite viktim&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;ONE&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;1 1".

    And, as a parting thought- since you do not advocate for the law, I suppose it would be okay for someone- anyone- to perpetrate crimes of the most heinous sort against you or your family?
    What the fuck is this strawman? Just because we don&#39;t believe that state racism should be enshrined in law doesn&#39;t mean I&#39;m about to let you rape my family or whatever, you stupid fuck.

    Since you don&#39;t believe in following the law, certainly you wouldn&#39;t report it, but instead go out for revenge and/or satisfaction on your own? And suppose you DID exact personal revenge- what then? Do both families call it even and you go out for a beer with the original criminal&#39;s family, calling it &#39;even&#39;? I think not. Remember, without the law we are left with our only legal system of &#39;an eye for an eye&#39;- under which soon the entire world would be blind.)
    The thing is that we&#39;re fine, to an extent, with the idea of proscribed behaviours and their enforcement (even anarchists like myself) but the idea of a state organ with a monopoly on coercive force and a large section of racist enforcers does make us uncomfortable.

    Paraphrasing Gandhi is not, and never will be, a substitute for a decent argument.
    Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.

    [FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]

    "Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.

    Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
  8. #28
    Join Date Oct 2005
    Posts 11,269
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Justin Barker

    It does&#39;nt seem to exist any information on whether or not he hung up those gallows, or if any on the perpetrators where at school.

    Regardless, it cannot go unpunished with a 6-to-1 directly unprovoked assault, almost resulting in a person&#39;s death. Even though I think 26 years in prison is extremely harsh.
  9. #29
    Join Date May 2007
    Location Africa
    Posts 657
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by Serpent@September 28, 2007 02:29 pm
    Justin Barker

    It does&#39;nt seem to exist any information on whether or not he hung up those gallows, or if any on the perpetrators where at school.

    Regardless, it cannot go unpunished with a 6-to-1 directly unprovoked assault, almost resulting in a person&#39;s death. Even though I think 26 years in prison is extremely harsh.
    Almost resulting in his death?I know of people who&#39;ve been beaten near death or beaten up horribly, and usually they their condition makes them only to lay in a hospital bed and unable to attend school functions later in the day like Mr. Barker.

    So please leave out the bourgeoisie media nonsense out of this critical discussion.
    The emancipation of the working class must be the work of the workers themselves. Flora Tristan, 1843.
    Most Kickass Blog
    Zabalaza.Net

    wardhiigley! bang bang muqdisho! xarunta dalka SOOMAALIYA!
  10. #30
    Join Date Sep 2007
    Posts 1
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The Jena 6 guy was just released on bail.
  11. #31
    Join Date Oct 2005
    Posts 11,269
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by blackstone+September 28, 2007 03:01 pm--> (blackstone @ September 28, 2007 03:01 pm)
    Serpent
    @September 28, 2007 02:29 pm
    Justin Barker

    It does&#39;nt seem to exist any information on whether or not he hung up those gallows, or if any on the perpetrators where at school.

    Regardless, it cannot go unpunished with a 6-to-1 directly unprovoked assault, almost resulting in a person&#39;s death. Even though I think 26 years in prison is extremely harsh.
    Almost resulting in his death?I know of people who&#39;ve been beaten near death or beaten up horribly, and usually they their condition makes them only to lay in a hospital bed and unable to attend school functions later in the day like Mr. Barker.

    So please leave out the bourgeoisie media nonsense out of this critical discussion. [/b]
    He was badly beaten, and have got some injuries.

    Personally, I think the punishments discussed are too hard, but that maybe 1,5 year with parole (making it 9 months) is justifiable.

    I mean, no one has denied the allegations.
  12. #32
    Join Date Jul 2006
    Posts 44
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    One thing, at least, has become crystal clear over the course of this thread: I, for one, would dread having the majority of you in power as you aren&#39;t the slightest bit interested in the enforcement of laws and would rather degenerate to mob rule.

    For society- ANY society- to function there MUST be some form of law (or &#39;tribal custom&#39; which takes the form of law) by which that society conducts it&#39;s day-to-day business in a civil manner. Without this, it simply becomes a modern-day &#39;Mad Max&#39; scenario in which the weak are preyed upon at will by the strong with the victims having no recourse or hope for justice.

    On a personal note, I find it rather humorous that a number of respondents brought such an empty arsenal of debate skills that they quickly degerated into being able to offer only name-calling and personal attacks in a pathetic attempt to bait me. I should probably advise you that I am quite content to accept your comments of that nature as I am secure in the knowledge that they are simply more evidence of the phenomenon of &#39;Internet Bravado&#39; so readily adopted by those who truly have no capacity for reality-based thought or discussion.

    To those of you who responded with honest, thoughtful opinions (as opposed to mere ideological posturing) I offer my thanks and kudos for your participation in this thread.

    With this post, my own participation in this thread is ended; I am satisfied that my position is sound and will prevail in the end.
    <span style=\'color:red\'><span style=\'color:red\'>Communist Party, USA</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Communist League</span></span>
  13. #33
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location England
    Posts 8,376
    Rep Power 74

    Default

    Originally posted by A Suvorov@September 28, 2007 11:56 pm
    One thing, at least, has become crystal clear over the course of this thread: I, for one, would dread having the majority of you in power as you aren&#39;t the slightest bit interested in the enforcement of laws and would rather degenerate to mob rule.
    Well thank fuck none of us want to be "in power". I don&#39;t know if you&#39;ve failed to grasp the idea of "stateless classless society" or if you&#39;re being wilfully ignorant but I&#39;d like to ask you cease posting until you work out how to be less of a shoulder biting shitwit.


    For society- ANY society- to function there MUST be some form of law (or &#39;tribal custom&#39; which takes the form of law)
    And thus it follows that we should use the law as an excuse our obvious racism?

    by which that society conducts it&#39;s day-to-day business in a civil manner. Without this, it simply becomes a modern-day &#39;Mad Max&#39; scenario in which the weak are preyed upon at will by the strong with the victims having no recourse or hope for justice.
    Yes, as if the proponents of stateless society haven&#39;t heard that one since day fucking one. I&#39;m sure the learning forum is full of people who, unlike you, had the intellectual curiosity to wonder how we propose running a society before criticising how we&#39;d run it based on some ill thought out straw man.

    On a personal note, I find it rather humorous that a number of respondents brought such an empty arsenal of debate skills that they quickly degerated into being able to offer only name-calling and personal attacks in a pathetic attempt to bait me.
    Typical of your kind, you&#39;re insulted so you assume that everything that surrounded the insult is so much empty guff and therefore feel free to ignore it. People like that seem to be the exact opposite of internet tough guys - they come on line and suddenly develop a much thinner skin than they have in real life.

    I should probably advise you that I am quite content to accept your comments of that nature as I am secure in the knowledge that they are simply more evidence of the phenomenon of &#39;Internet Bravado&#39; so readily adopted by those who truly have no capacity for reality-based thought or discussion.
    What an interesting and original thought, the fact you can&#39;t take an insult online and immediately attempt to rationalise into your own pathetic superiority-complex paradigm is something that no one has ever done.

    To those of you who responded with honest, thoughtful opinions (as opposed to mere ideological posturing) I offer my thanks and kudos for your participation in this thread.
    "Honest and thoughtful opinions" here obviously being anything that agreed with your world-view and analysis because obviously no one who exposed your support for a racist ruling was capable of anything beyond ideological posturing. Thankfully those that think you&#39;re a racist twat that&#39;s been suckered into an incredibly warped sense of bourgeois justice probably don&#39;t want your kudos.

    With this post, my own participation in this thread is ended; I am satisfied that my position is sound and will prevail in the end.
    Sound or not, your position looks set to prevail - the white judge, white jury and white legislators have pretty much seen to that.
    Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.

    [FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]

    "Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.

    Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
  14. #34
    Join Date Jul 2006
    Posts 44
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Apart from the original intent of this thread, I do have a few comments regarding Jazzrat&#39;s previous post, and no- this is neither an attack nor an apology- it&#39;s simply commentary and inquiry. It is quite possible the bulk of this post should be moved elsewhere, and I invite the moderator(s) to do so if it is deemed appropriate.

    Regarding the entire &#39;Jena Incident&#39; I never implied or flatly stated any racist attitude- quite the opposite, I am in sympathy with the blacks who were wronged in the first place, and wish they had enjoyed the benefits of just decision-making by those in power. HOWEVER, even though THEY didn&#39;t get a fair shake, two wrongs do NOT make a right and in no way did the kid deserve the beating he recieved. If you use &#39;racial tension&#39; as an excuse, I daresay those black kids are in for it, because then it naturally follows that their attack will be prosecuted under existing &#39;hate laws&#39;- Jackson and Sharpton can demagogue all they want about the &#39;plight of the poor, downtrodden blacks&#39; but when the rubber hits the road all they are doing is playing right into the hands of those very racist judges and lawyers you speak of by handing them a &#39;hate crime&#39; issue. Is is right that said legal actions may be conducted by a racially-biased court system? Of course not&#33; BUT how do we ensure there IS no racially-biased court system? By changing the playing field altogether- but in order to do so, *we* (the Left) are going to have to gain a majority in the power grid of soceity and government. Which leads me to...

    Now, as for my not understanding the &#39;stateless, classless society&#39; you could not be more incorrect; I do indeed fully grasp that concept- but while doing so, I know that the current program the Left is pursuing isn&#39;t quite working. Oh, sure, Hillary Clinton may usher in a near-decade of socialist-style retooling of government and economy, but we&#39;re not going to see Red October for a long time. The question I have is- and this is an honest inquiry, not an attempt to stir things up- what IS the current plan of action to bring about this &#39;stateless classless society&#39; that will be the worker&#39;s paradise? As for the societal aspects of the &#39;SCS&#39;, do we do away with racism by legislating it out of existence, or do we do eliminate it through the perpetuation of violence, or do we re-educate everyone involved? Or is there a fourth way not mentioned? Once this racism bugaboo is removed, will that *really* make things better as far as eliminating social classes? Or is there something else to be done. In short, in the words of Comrade Lenin, "WHAT IS TO BE DONE?"

    It is obvious there will be no revolution in the streets any time in the near future- probably not in my lifetime, the way things are going- so in order to effect change, what is left available to us? The obvious answer is to effect change from WITHIN the system while preparing for the eventual replacement of the broken system. How to do this? Perhaps we could take a lesson from the early National Socialists and Communists- now bear with me- and create, in effect, a &#39;shadow government&#39; that mirrors existing essential organs and is simply waiting for the appropriate person/party to be elected into power. Granted, it&#39;s not a perfect solution, but it does at least get the ball rolling and when/if *our side* gets any sort of power we&#39;re ready to roll instead of throwing something together at the last minute. At the same time this &#39;shadow government&#39; is being created, we (the Left in general) will have to work hard to get *our* people elected within the system so they can begin the slow process of creating condition more favorable for *our* movement.

    In short, unless we really come together and work for real change- yes, even in such a broken system as we have at present- we&#39;re never going to get anywhere. We can wave banners, we can stage protests- but until we gain real legal standing and usable power and credibility we&#39;re not going anywhere.

    In closing, I accept the calling-out on my own &#39;name-calling&#39;- in the interest of bringing everyone together, I should not have perpetuated that particular cycle.
    <span style=\'color:red\'><span style=\'color:red\'>Communist Party, USA</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Communist League</span></span>
  15. #35
    Join Date May 2007
    Posts 569
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    Suvorov a future David Horowitz/Max Eastman, these type of "leftists" are prime candidates for the right. This site is full of &#39;em. :blush:
  16. #36
    Join Date May 2005
    Location L.A California
    Posts 627
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    I support the Jena 6 fully and hope this is the tipping point for us African Americans
    ^^^^^
    I WANNA PUT EMPHASIS ON THIS&#33;


    Its also very Important to All Colored People of ameriKKKa&#33;
    We must be freed Politicaly by Anarchy, Economicaly by communism
    -kropotkin

    Lenin is not comparable to any revolutionary figure in history. Revolutionaries have had ideals. Lenin has none.
    -kropotkin
  17. #37
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location England
    Posts 8,376
    Rep Power 74

    Default

    Originally posted by A Suvorov+October 02, 2007 12:41 am--> (A Suvorov &#064; October 02, 2007 12:41 am) Apart from the original intent of this thread, I do have a few comments regarding Jazzrat&#39;s previous post, and no- this is neither an attack nor an apology- it&#39;s simply commentary and inquiry. It is quite possible the bulk of this post should be moved elsewhere, and I invite the moderator(s) to do so if it is deemed appropriate. [/b]

    I hate to point this out but you said, and I quote:

    You
    With this post, my own participation in this thread is ended
    Now were you using a non-standard definition of "ended" that means "hasn&#39;t ended yet" or are you just a lying cumsmear, choose one.

    Regarding the entire &#39;Jena Incident&#39; I never implied or flatly stated any racist attitude- quite the opposite, I am in sympathy with the blacks who were wronged in the first place, and wish they had enjoyed the benefits of just decision-making by those in power. HOWEVER, even though THEY didn&#39;t get a fair shake, two wrongs do NOT make a right and in no way did the kid deserve the beating he recieved.
    I disagree, the kids were perfectly justified in doing what they did - when a peaceful method is getting you nowhere then violence is the obvious next step.

    If you use &#39;racial tension&#39; as an excuse, I daresay those black kids are in for it, because then it naturally follows that their attack will be prosecuted under existing &#39;hate laws&#39;- Jackson and Sharpton can demagogue all they want about the &#39;plight of the poor, downtrodden blacks&#39;
    Do you have any idea how stupid and racist complaining about, to paraphrase, "the uppity blacks"?

    but when the rubber hits the road all they are doing is playing right into the hands of those very racist judges and lawyers you speak of by handing them a &#39;hate crime&#39; issue.
    As far as I&#39;m aware the kids aren&#39;t being prosecuted on the basis of race, for fairly obvious reasons.

    Is is right that said legal actions may be conducted by a racially-biased court system? Of course not&#33; BUT how do we ensure there IS no racially-biased court system? By changing the playing field altogether- but in order to do so, *we* (the Left) are going to have to gain a majority in the power grid of soceity and government. Which leads me to...
    When we&#39;re in a majority there will be a revolution, our &#39;power&#39; in the current legal system won&#39;t ever matter. After all you must be aware that towards the end capitalism will be doing everything to defend itself - fascist dictatorships, anti-communist legislature and anything else to keep the bourgeoisie in power.

    Now, as for my not understanding the &#39;stateless, classless society&#39; you could not be more incorrect; I do indeed fully grasp that concept- but while doing so, I know that the current program the Left is pursuing isn&#39;t quite working.
    Cuba, Chiapas and Oaxaca all beg to differ, I daresay.

    Oh, sure, Hillary Clinton may usher in a near-decade of socialist-style retooling of government and economy,
    Uh, what the fuck are you talking about? You&#39;re being ironic right, please tell me that&#39;s irony for the sake of my sanity.

    but we&#39;re not going to see Red October for a long time.
    No one&#39;s saying the revolution will be next week.

    The question I have is- and this is an honest inquiry, not an attempt to stir things up- what IS the current plan of action to bring about this &#39;stateless classless society&#39; that will be the worker&#39;s paradise?
    The plan differs depending on who you ask. Most Leninists will tell you the plan is to have a small but supremely class-conscious "vanguard" which will lead the workers into a glorious revolution after which, in theory, there will be a short "transitional period" in which the old classes are wiped out via a dictatorship of the proletariat and once this has happened the state will wither away to nothingness. Most Anarchists on the other hand will tell you that the revolution will only occur through the actions of an almost entirely conscious working class and that the "revolution" itself will be used to prepare people mentally and culturally for a stateless and classless society which will be set up immediately after the revolution.

    As for the societal aspects of the &#39;SCS&#39;, do we do away with racism by legislating it out of existence, or do we do eliminate it through the perpetuation of violence, or do we re-educate everyone involved? Or is there a fourth way not mentioned?
    Fourth way. It&#39;s quite easy really, a conscious working class does not hold racist views and if, by chance, a racist crime comes up it will be treated like any other crime - the lack of institutional racism will mean that no one group of people need any special protection from other racially motivated crimes. Although I&#39;d imagine that anyone who professed racist beliefs would be ostracised from society.

    Once this racism bugaboo is removed, will that *really* make things better as far as eliminating social classes?
    You&#39;ve got your question back to front. It&#39;s not that a lack of racism will help eliminate social class but that eliminating social class will help destroy racism.

    Or is there something else to be done. In short, in the words of Comrade Lenin, "WHAT IS TO BE DONE?"
    The first thing we need to do is incinerate Lenin&#39;s corpse, it&#39;s fucking grim and I&#39;m frightened that one day the kind of person that talks about "comrade Lenin" will steal it and either have sex with it or start talking to it. In all seriousness though what is to be done in the here and now is a building of class consciousness.

    It is obvious there will be no revolution in the streets any time in the near future- probably not in my lifetime, the way things are going-
    Correct.

    so in order to effect change, what is left available to us? The obvious answer is to effect change from WITHIN the system while preparing for the eventual replacement of the broken system. How to do this? Perhaps we could take a lesson from the early National Socialists and Communists- now bear with me- and create, in effect, a &#39;shadow government&#39; that mirrors existing essential organs and is simply waiting for the appropriate person/party to be elected into power. Granted, it&#39;s not a perfect solution, but it does at least get the ball rolling and when/if *our side* gets any sort of power we&#39;re ready to roll instead of throwing something together at the last minute. At the same time this &#39;shadow government&#39; is being created, we (the Left in general) will have to work hard to get *our* people elected within the system so they can begin the slow process of creating condition more favorable for *our* movement.
    Criticising that idea would take an entirely new thread, I recommend you open one in politics or learning and expand upon it.

    In short, unless we really come together and work for real change- yes, even in such a broken system as we have at present- we&#39;re never going to get anywhere. We can wave banners, we can stage protests- but until we gain real legal standing and usable power and credibility we&#39;re not going anywhere.
    "Waving banners and staging protests" may not seem effective to you but I doubt you were radicalised by a protest (nor was I but I know people who were) - it is important that we radicalise the proletariat, far more important I would say than any kind of parliamentary involvement - eventually, and it is a sad thing to say, there will be a revolution and that will necessitate violence and the complete destruction of this system.

    In closing, I accept the calling-out on my own &#39;name-calling&#39;- in the interest of bringing everyone together, I should not have perpetuated that particular cycle.
    I thought it was us that started the name calling, no matter.
    Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.

    [FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]

    "Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.

    Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
  18. #38
    Join Date May 2007
    Location Africa
    Posts 657
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by Serpent+September 28, 2007 11:50 pm--> (Serpent @ September 28, 2007 11:50 pm)
    Originally posted by blackstone+September 28, 2007 03:01 pm--> (blackstone &#064; September 28, 2007 03:01 pm)
    Serpent
    @September 28, 2007 02:29 pm
    Justin Barker

    It does&#39;nt seem to exist any information on whether or not he hung up those gallows, or if any on the perpetrators where at school.

    Regardless, it cannot go unpunished with a 6-to-1 directly unprovoked assault, almost resulting in a person&#39;s death. Even though I think 26 years in prison is extremely harsh.
    Almost resulting in his death?I know of people who&#39;ve been beaten near death or beaten up horribly, and usually they their condition makes them only to lay in a hospital bed and unable to attend school functions later in the day like Mr. Barker.

    So please leave out the bourgeoisie media nonsense out of this critical discussion. [/b]
    He was badly beaten, and have got some injuries.

    Personally, I think the punishments discussed are too hard, but that maybe 1,5 year with parole (making it 9 months) is justifiable.

    I mean, no one has denied the allegations. [/b]

    Your using subjective words, we want facts&#33;

    What is badly beaten?

    How many times have you seen a fight, and the loser is described as having been, "beaten up" or "whipped", even though they don&#39;t necessarily look the part?

    How many times have you seen a fight, where the winner looks more fucked up than the loser? Yet, its the loser who is described as being beat up.

    Have you been in a fight?When you get hit, sometimes you bruise, sometimes, you swell and get lumps, and well, sometimes you even bleed. Those things can happen with you not being near death.

    When you get beaten up badly, your body needs to heal, especially if your "beaten near death". Healing involves resting and not going to events later on the day of the fight.


    And yes, people have denied the allegations. There&#39;s conflicting reports on whether or not Bell was involved, or whether he was the one doing the heavy damage. That&#39;s why i always tell people read more into the case. Stop with the bourgeois media and stop believing ambulance chasing lawyers.

    Victim of fender bender

    My neck, my back. I can&#39;t move, i can&#39;t breathe. Call my lawyer.
    The emancipation of the working class must be the work of the workers themselves. Flora Tristan, 1843.
    Most Kickass Blog
    Zabalaza.Net

    wardhiigley! bang bang muqdisho! xarunta dalka SOOMAALIYA!
  19. #39
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Posts 2,472
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Q: If the situation were reversed (ie, if it were a white boy who sat under the tree, and blacks had placed nooses in the tree, and a YEAR later a gang of six white boys beat down a single black kid over the incident) would the black community be as outraged and protesting in defense of the white boys?
    A: NO
    such a situation doesn&#39;t happen, it never will. Why? Because white people don&#39;t have a deep rooted history of oppression from the system with traditions and all. Black people are a oppressed nationality, they face racism, super-exploitation, and oppression at every corner.

    The fact is that, this type of shit doesn&#39;t happen to white people so there is no "if the situation were reversed"

    This whole incident is being used in so many WRONG ways by all parties involved; unfortunately the facts are that 1) the issue was already dealt with by the authorities- if the public had a beef with them they should have taken it to whoever decided the course of action
    what? the fucking state? Yeah we&#39;re doing that. The reason why people are finding out about this is because it was like a regular small Southern town with a population of 2000 people, the story was essentially suppressed by the fact that its considered so normal to the system.

    THEN, not a year later, 2) regardless of what happened, it in no way gives the Gang of Six free license to beat down anyone, and 3) the Gang of Six all need to be dealt with under the RULE OF LAW, not under MOB RULES.
    it wasn&#39;t a year later. It was a response to a racist kid spewing racism. The response was a response he deserved, the Jena 6 are heroes for that. The fact though is that this kid went to the school dance later that night, yet now these youth are charged with up to 22 years in prison. Meanwhile having a sawed off shotgun to the face, having nooses hung to trees, and being beat up much more severly is perfectly normal if you&#39;re black and you&#39;re attackers are white and under these type of tensions in the state&#39;s eyes.

    And what kind of Communist are you that you think that the "Rule of Law" of the United States, a law code founded on slavery, racism, and super-exploitation is to be respected like that. This isn&#39;t mob rules though, the fact of the matter is that the Jena 6 are guilty of nothing under the laws of the US. The "murder weapon" is a fucking tennis shoe in this case.
    "Love Other Human Beings like you would Yourself"

    -- Ho Chi Minh

    "We Don't Care who gets elected, because whoever it is will be Overthrown"

    -- Subcomandante Marcos
  20. #40
    Join Date Apr 2006
    Posts 2,472
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Originally posted by Serpent+September 28, 2007 11:50 pm--> (Serpent @ September 28, 2007 11:50 pm)
    Originally posted by [email protected] 28, 2007 03:01 pm
    Serpent
    @September 28, 2007 02:29 pm
    Justin Barker

    It does&#39;nt seem to exist any information on whether or not he hung up those gallows, or if any on the perpetrators where at school.

    Regardless, it cannot go unpunished with a 6-to-1 directly unprovoked assault, almost resulting in a person&#39;s death. Even though I think 26 years in prison is extremely harsh.
    Almost resulting in his death?I know of people who&#39;ve been beaten near death or beaten up horribly, and usually they their condition makes them only to lay in a hospital bed and unable to attend school functions later in the day like Mr. Barker.

    So please leave out the bourgeoisie media nonsense out of this critical discussion.
    He was badly beaten, and have got some injuries.

    Personally, I think the punishments discussed are too hard, but that maybe 1,5 year with parole (making it 9 months) is justifiable.

    I mean, no one has denied the allegations. [/b]
    He wasn&#39;t "nearly beaten to death" he went to the school dance that night.
    "Love Other Human Beings like you would Yourself"

    -- Ho Chi Minh

    "We Don't Care who gets elected, because whoever it is will be Overthrown"

    -- Subcomandante Marcos

Similar Threads

  1. KKK March in Jena on MLK Day
    By Lenin II in forum Action & Anti-Fascism
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 22nd January 2008, 23:28
  2. School Walk Out in Support of Jena 6
    By blackstone in forum Upcoming Events
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 5th October 2007, 00:51
  3. NYC: Fri. 10/5 PSL Public Forum; Free the Jena 6!
    By OneBrickOneVoice in forum Upcoming Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 4th October 2007, 00:07
  4. DC: March to Free the Jena 6! 10/2
    By OneBrickOneVoice in forum Upcoming Events
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th September 2007, 02:34
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st January 1970, 00:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread