if the government is not for filling its job in some peoples eyes do you think it might not be necessary for a entrepreneur to fill the need if he feels he can do it better and more efficiently.
Of course, but typically that option is foreclosed for one of two reasons: either the government simply forbids competition categorically, or they subsidize the government enterprise with coercively collected tax dollars. How is an entrepreneur, even with a far better and more efficient business plan, supposed to compete with an enterprise that his customers are obliged to pay for whether they want to or not? In fact it has happened, but usually only when the government's offerings are such ridiculously poor value that people are willing to pay the government price plus the private price just for the private product.
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
# # #
Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho