Originally posted by EwokUtopia@January 31, 2007 02:02 am
High school kids are still kids. They may have adult bodies and capabilities, and if they are commiting hate crimes, thats a completely different story, but if they are running their mouths, one must remember that people that age are still quite immature for the most part and need to do some growing up. For me to attack one of these kids would not be right, considering the age difference, unless under extreme provocation. Nazism can be a fad, because it is often inspired by hate-rock, and the music brings most young nazi's to the idealogy, that is a very common starting place. I've no doubt in my mind that some of you were brought to leftism by Rage Against the Machine and Anti-Flag and such bands, consider the effects of Skrewdriver on young impressionable and frustrated kids (largely white males, but there are a few exceptions to this, remember the Red Lake massacre.)
An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure, and attacking these kids will cure nothing. It will at best make them shut up and keep their beliefs inward to fester, and at worst make them martyrs-of-sorts. I think people here place too much faith on the rationalizing capabilities of adolescent mindsets. High school is for many people a difficult time of great confusion and frustration, and people do or say things in this period of their lives that they will later come to regret. Take the example of gay teenagers who go through high school being militantly anti-gay. I know plenty of these people, and Im sure many people here know such cases as well.
Nazism is a cult of hyper-masculinity, and Ive no doubt in my mind that many kids who profess nazism in their youths do so out of insecurity and trying to proove themselves to be macho. There are other ways of doing this of course, but some impressionable kids who stumble across the wrong bands or websites do take this path to proove their so-called masculinity.
When talking about young nazi's, you have to consider the causes. Impressionability is a huge cause, so is gender roles, and so is, in probably most cases, inferiority complexes.
Your assuming that these kids are actively violent skinheads, and that may be the case, in that case its a bit different, but in my experiance, the fascists I have dealt with are all theory and rhetoric and no violence. In fact, Im not sure that theyve even been in a fight. The thing about this type of fascist, which I can guarentee is the large majority of neofascists, is that they love to debate, and this gives us a channel to refute their broken logic, and perhaps in time turn them away from the path theyre on. Using violence against words is a horrible strategy that will only harm the situation, wouldnt you agree? Suppose you were in a debate with a neoconservative, and he punched you in the face and kicked your ass (you also make the assumption that you are going to win in a fight against the neofascists), would it make you shut up, or would it make you speak louder?
Id like to hear what you people would actually hope to achieve by using violence against these kids (in cases where they arent being actively violent to begin with). What do you think this will accomplish, aside from making you feel big and right about your actions? Have you considered the possible repercussions? The fact that you have likely solidified their views? Do you even care about that? Your tactics seem to me to be flawed at best, and at worst just another manifestation of egotistical hyper-masculinity.