Thread: Tendency of the rate of profit to fall

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  1. #1
    Join Date Dec 2004
    Posts 2,209
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Do you agree with the existence of such a tendency?
    If they had faith in me and my motives, they wouldn't need a union

    Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz
  2. #2
    Join Date Sep 2006
    Location Doncaster, England
    Posts 110
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Do you mean that the goods been produced lose their value?

    If so, then I think the profit would fall, but take what I say with a pinch of salt, because I'm only a beginner on the economic side of things.

    The reason I think this is that capitalists have to provide what people want, and when they want it. If the goods been produced are not wanted by the consumer society, then the profit would fall, I think. The key for a capitalist is to always always always maximise profits, and they usually are able to regain control, even when the rate of profits fall. This is probably due to more exploitation, like they don't do enough already, and some clever deals and what not.

    Like I said, there will defenitely be other people on this site that are more knowledgeable than me, so basically read my reply if you want. If it sounds stupid, then don't read it all lol.
  3. #3
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Posts 957
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    I will when I see proof for it.
  4. #4
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Posts 2,796
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Originally posted by NWOG@Oct 16 2006, 05:09 AM
    Do you agree with the existence of such a tendency?
    Well, let the ratio of goods exchangeable for one another be defined as value (as extensively covered in Das Kapital, vol. I, Chapter 1).

    Let the set of numbers defined by the infinite summation:
    SUM^{infinity}_{n=0} L_{a_{n}} w (1+r)^{n} = X
    for every industry sectory. The summation converges to some arbitrary number, and the ratio of these numbers are equal to the value of the good (by the definition of value).

    As t->infinity, L_{a_{n}} -> 0, and the arbitrary number (which is actually the sum of the dated labor inputs into the commodity) remains constant. As more goods are created, the value of the goods, represented as V, V->0.

    (Note on symbols: w = wage as a fraction of the surplus, r = rate of profit, L_{a_{n}} = Labor input to the a-sector in the economy in the n-th year as a fraction of the whole labor market.)

    This supposes that innovation is constant in the capitalist mode of production.
    TragicClown: "i'm not though...i'm how like, every conservative christian father would want their daughter to behave"
    Intelligitimate: "The bible has gang-rape in it...I like the Bible."
    "The right to enslave is a positive right." - Tungsten
    "The hand-mill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill society with the industrial capitalist." Karl Marx
    People who cheated me out of a mathematical proof: Jazzremington, Severian, Che y Marijuana

Similar Threads

  1. Tendency of the rate of profit to fall
    By Matty_UK in forum Learning
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 7th November 2006, 13:13
  2. Law of the Falling Tendency of the Rate of Profit
    By visceroid in forum Learning
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10th January 2006, 04:07
  3. The rate of profit
    By ComradeRed in forum Theory
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23rd January 2005, 20:52
  4. Tendency for the rate of profit to fall
    By PinkoCommieScum in forum Learning
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 1st December 2004, 00:46
  5. The tendency of profit to fall...
    By ComradeRed in forum Theory
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22nd July 2004, 12:43

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread