Thread: Abe Lincoln being racist

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Join Date Jul 2002
    Location Here
    Posts 1,476
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I've always been told Abe Lincoln was a racist, I just never knew why. Can anyone tell me why he was a racist?
  2. #2
    Join Date Mar 2002
    Location Stockholm
    Posts 4,068
    Organisation
    Committee for a Workers' International
    Rep Power 26

    Default

    I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.

    A quote by the "great" emancipator Abraham Lincoln.
    There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror... --- Mark Twain
  3. #3
    Join Date Mar 2002
    Location Stockholm
    Posts 4,068
    Organisation
    Committee for a Workers' International
    Rep Power 26

    Default

    It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that 'I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.

    Another quote from Lincoln.
    There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror... --- Mark Twain
  4. #4
    Join Date Jul 2002
    Location Here
    Posts 1,476
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    That is racist according to our times. I'm just wondering how many other people in the US thought that way, in his time.
  5. #5
    Join Date Oct 2002
    Posts 2,924
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Lincoln didn't fight to free the slaves, he needed good soldiers. His army was inferior altough bigger than the southern army. And there there was an opurtunity to have a lot of dedicated men on your side, altough black. His own army, white, was sick of fighting for negroes. The main reason for the war was taxmoney. *sigh, greed where will it bring us next?*
    Let no one charge that socialists have arrayed class against class in this struggle. That has been done long since in the evolution of capitalist society. One class is small and rich and the other large and poor....One consists of capitalists and the other of workers. These two classes are at war. Every day of peace is at the expense of labor. There can be no peace and good will between these two essentially antagonistic economic classes. - Debs

Similar Threads

  1. Discussion about Lincoln
    By Pawn Power in forum History
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 28th December 2007, 20:17
  2. Hello to Lincoln Socialist
    By T_SP in forum Introductions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 5th June 2005, 18:56
  3. Landing on the Lincoln doesn't mean you're Lincoln
    By HankMorgan in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 9th October 2003, 04:15
  4. Was Abraham Lincoln a Communist?
    By Comrade Gorley in forum History
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 24th May 2003, 01:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread