Yeah, I read they were socialistic too. Here's an article I posted on this site that mentions that: Click here: Socialism in Latin America
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Read somewhere
Wherein the Incas
Were 'commies'
Anyone know about there economic system?
\"Revolutions are dreamt up by intellectuals but their aims are so unrealistic they\'ll stoop to drastic measures. Following the revolution the worthy passions for rebirth are swallowed up by bureaucracy and mediocrity. Intellectuals dislike this so they
Yeah, I read they were socialistic too. Here's an article I posted on this site that mentions that: Click here: Socialism in Latin America
<span style=\'color:red\'>"You can probably change more hearts and minds with one good film than with thousands of e-mail pamphlets...." - John Cusack</span>
They have the same vision of life as the great communist thinkers but tey didn't see It as a political system.It was more like a religeous way of life for them.
Muere lentamente quien no viaja,
quien no lee,
quien no escucha música,
quien no halla encanto en sí mismo.
Muere lentamente
quien destruye su amor propio;
quien no se deja ayudar.
The Incas were the most powerful South American Empire. They hada population of 12 million and we far more sophisticated then most of the tribes around them. They were defeated through the treachery of the Spaniard scum, Pizarro. The Aztecs are more interesting however.
Like the Native Americans the Incas were defeated essentially from disease.
\"Revolutions are dreamt up by intellectuals but their aims are so unrealistic they\'ll stoop to drastic measures. Following the revolution the worthy passions for rebirth are swallowed up by bureaucracy and mediocrity. Intellectuals dislike this so they
Yes, but the fact that they couldnt unite after the emperor's death also caused their defeat.
the incan economic system was based in slavery and you could become slave by either be captured after a batle or when you contracted too many debts (like in the pre-democratic greek system) thats all i know about theyr economy.
Guess how Tupac got his name! (Tupac Amaru) the last INCA emperor...Shakir's mom weas a Black Panther
Hacia la victoria
Strictly speaking the Incas had an Asiatic Mode of Production. This is something about which Marx and Engels did not write much about. The system was based on the collective ownership of the land which was worked in a collective way by the "ayllu", the Incan comune based on blood links. But above this propertlyless structure there was a hierarchycal state dominated by a military caste. People, apart from working in the land in a collective way were forced to work in public works for a certain number of days every year, and the ayllu had to pay tributes to the state and the priest caste out of their work.
RedJordi
They had socialized medicine too...but I HATE reading those QUIPUS!
Hacia la victoria
I just wiped out the Incas in Civilization 3.
It was pretty easy, they fell because they only had horseback riding technology and had just acquired gunpowder and I had already developed tanks.
I don't know what their society life was like but I think they were still in depotism, but I could be wrong.
<span style=\'color:red\'>"You might say that I am a dreamer, but I am not the only one."</span>
For obvious reasons...
In find the Incas most interesting though. They weren't that "barbarian".
I won't call a society built on slavery communistic though.
#========||===========================>
I'm back. Until I'm banned that is.
"Sustainable Development is the central tool by which the UN intends to intends to impose its global governance agenda and is the key reason why the UN remains a threat to American independence. " -Robert DeWeese
