Thread: soc sec defends totalitarian prebirth intervention

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  1. #1
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    PM's pre-birth intervention pledge defended


    The social exclusion secretary has insisted that state intervention "can work".

    Ahead of a major speech by the prime minister on the subject this week and an action plan from her department, Hilary Armstrong defended Tony Blair's plan to identify potential troublemakers from as early as before they are born.

    The idea of pre-emptive government action against poverty and anti-social behaviour has been attacked variously as a gimmick, Nazi-style "eugenics" and an extension of the 'nanny state'.

    But Armstrong said that while the government had raised "many, many people out of dire poverty and worklessness" it now needed to give them "the ability to see what they can do to raise their children's opportunities".

    "There is a group at the bottom that no government has previously effectively tackled and we are now taking the next step," she told the BBC's Sunday AM programme.

    "I know that they do have aspirations for their family. They too would like their children to being doing very well.

    "For some they have not had the experience, they have not had the role models...

    "If we can find what it is that will really tap into them, then we can really change their belief in themselves and their ability to cope with the world."
    http://www.epolitix.com/EN/News/200609/10f...2b9be1a0e22.htm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2. #2
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location England
    Posts 8,376
    Rep Power 74

    Default

    Disgusting.

    But Armstrong said that while the government had raised "many, many people out of dire poverty and worklessness" it now needed to give them "the ability to see what they can do to raise their children's opportunities".
    Both lying and soundbiting? Sounds lovely doesn't it "Raising them out of poverty" and "seeing what they can do to raise their children's opportunities" - but then you consider that second statement involves taking said children from their parents.

    Worst of all is of course the fact that this creates situations where people are literally too prole to have kids, and that disgusts me.
    Sciences & Environment rocks my bedroom.

    [FONT=Arial]Say what you mean and say it mean...[/FONT]

    "Frankly if we have a revolution and you stop me eating meat, I'm going to eat you."- The inimitable Skinz.

    Be careful, lest the time comes where we have to weigh you against a duck.
  3. #3
    Join Date Jan 2006
    Posts 700
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    This would be hilarious if it wasent so serious. When wilél we see the 1984-esque day when children will be assigned taskes before thir conception, the production of children will be regemented so that no exess poor are created, the Party will have TVs in the nursery broadcasting porpaganda...
    NEVER WORK
    FUCK M68
    LOVE
    LIVE
    RIOT
    all caps, all insurrection, all the time
  4. #4
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 9,222
    Rep Power 93

    Default

    Oh, come on.

    If those ideas were in practice at the time Tony Blair was conceived, we could now be rid of Tony Blair.

    Luís Henrique
    The world is not as it is, but as it is constructed.

    Falsely attributed to Lenin

Similar Threads

  1. Mao: Totalitarian?
    By Saint Street Revolution in forum History
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 7th October 2007, 10:50
  2. How do we know who's really a totalitarian and a
    By Cheung Mo in forum Learning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10th February 2007, 05:48

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts