Results 1 to 11 of 11
Link
PRAGUE (AFP) - The solar system may soon be home to a dozen planets, with three new additions to the club and more to come, if astronomers meeting in the Czech capital approve a new planetary definition, the conference organizer has said.
The proposal before the 26th general assembly of the International Astronomical Union distinguishes between planets and smaller celestial bodies such as comets and asteroids.
That results in a 12-planet solar system with eight classical planets and three bodies including Pluto in a new and growing category called "plutons" - Pluto-like objects - plus a former asteroid, Ceres, the IAU said.
Powerful new telescopes that have discovered large objects in the outer regions of the solar system present a challenge to the historically based definition of a "planet", which comes from the Greek word meaning "wanderer".
"Recent new discoveries have been made of objects in the outer regions of our solar system that have sizes comparable to and larger than Pluto," said IAU President Ron Ekers in a statement.
"These discoveries have rightfully called into question whether or not they should be considered as new 'planets'."
The planetary debate blasted off in July 2005 when a US team of astronomers announced that Pluto is much smaller than an enigmatic object, 2003 UB313, which its discoverers claim is the solar system's 10th planet.
UB313, found some 15 billion kilometres (nine billion miles) from Earth, ignited a huge row as Pluto's defenders said UB313 was not a planet, just a rock, or KBO -- Kuiper Belt Object -- which is the term for the estimated 100,000 pieces of icy, primeval debris encircling the sun on the outskirts of the solar system.
Since its founding in 1919, the IAU has been the arbiter in astronomical debates and after two years of work a committee has come up with a new planet definition to present to some 2,500 astronomers gathered in Prague through August 25.
According to the draft definition, a "planet" must be in orbit around a star, while not being itself a star, and it must be massive enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly spherical shape.
"Our goal was to find a scientific basis for a new definition of planet and we chose gravity as the determining factor. Nature decides whether or not an object is a planet," said Richard Binzel, a member of the defining committee.
That puts about dozen "candidate planets" on the IAU watchlist, which means even more planets could be named in the future.
If the current proposal is passed by the IAU assembly, the solar system would consist of the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Ceres, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Charon and 2003 UB313 (a "real" name to be chosen later).
The new "plutons" are distinguished from classical planets in that they reside in orbits around the sun that take longer than 200 years to complete -- meaning they are in orbit beyond Neptune.
The draft "planet definition" resolution will be discussed and refined during the Prague meeting and put up for a vote on August 24.
I personally think we should have different classifications of planets. If we are going to consider the tiny, round icy things that orbit the Earth planets...then we are going to have thousands of planets. Planets like pluto could be the "Frozen dwarves" or something and the huge planets like Jupiter could be the "Gas Giants"...similar to the way there are various sorts of stars.
Interesting news nonetheless.
Since any classification is based on our perception (i.e. naming these things planets doesn't change them), I think the standard for what is and is not a planet should be cultural rather than scientific.
Which is why when I am dictator, the standard will be "is it bigger than our moon?"
In my book, there are 8 planets. Pluto can bite me.
Hell yeah, that shit is not a planet!
I agree.
Burn them!!!11111111
You tell Moses to make bricks without straw,
Now he tells you to make cities without bricks!
....well that last part, scratch that...
But we cant just consider anything a planet. Its not right.
You tell Moses to make bricks without straw,
Now he tells you to make cities without bricks!
Why not a real name <_< ? Like Raccoon for instance :P
“Where the worker is regulated bureaucratically from childhood onwards, where he believes in authority, in those set over him, the main thing is to teach him to walk by himself.” - Marx
"It is illogical and incorrect to reduce everything to the economic [socialist] revolution, for the question is: how to eliminate [political] oppression? It cannot be eliminated without an economic revolution... But to limit ourselves to this is to lapse into absurd and wretched ... Economism." - Lenin
"[During a revolution, bourgeois democratic] demands [of the working class] ... push so hard on the outer limits of capital's rule that they appear likewise as forms of transition to a proletarian dictatorship." - Luxemburg
“Well, then go forward, Tower of Bebel! [August] Bebel is one of the most brilliant representatives of scientific international socialism. His writings, speeches and works make up a great tower, a strong arsenal, from which the working class should take their weapons. We cannot recommend it enough… And if the [International] deserves to be named Tower of Bebel... well, then we are lucky to have such a Tower of Bebel with us.” - Vooruit
Yeah, I remember reading about how an astronomer a year ago put some major doubts on whether Pluto should be classified as a planet or not. Very interesting stuff.
What I want to know is when the 10th planet is going to be renamed Rupert. Obviously it is now the 12th planet (after that stupid asteroids and that twin system), but still.
And more to the point, why not just have 8 planets, then a bunch of small plutons that aren't planets, then everything else? And I agree, Pluto and Co can bite me.
mmm ddnt they just agree that pluto was to be degraded its now a dwarf plannet... personally its a giant icecube to me
<span style=\'colorurple\'>El pueblo unido jamas sera vencido!</span>
<span style=\'color:red\'>"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." A.Einstein</span>
<span style=\'color:green\'>Those who lead the country into the abyss
Call ruling too difficult
For ordinary men.
Bertolt Brecht</span>
Che-Guevara.ru
This is wierd, so now what are the planets in our solar system?
Mars, earth, saturn, neptune uh...
