Thread: Genetic Engineering / Eugenics

Results 1 to 20 of 25

  1. #1
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Posts 1,555
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Assuming we do not force people into doing something, should society promote voluntary eugenics policies? Not killing people of course, but, if a child could be born without a disability, or with a higher IQ, should this be encouraged?

    In fact, one could argue that there is a moral obligation to genetical alter our future generations. After all, the improvement of the gene pool could save humanity from some inconvienent and sometimes even painful realities.

    To me, this seems like a obvious choice - yes. However, something makes me hesitate. If children with problems (or disadvantages) are seeing other families provide their children with stronger muscles, faster legs, et cetera, will non-improved (for lack of a better word) individuals feel intrinsically inferior? Will this result in distinctions between individuals that results in a perpetuation of a capitalist society?

    My last comment was streching quite far, but I want to provoke discussion. Even as I write this, I am uncertain as to whether or not the idea that certain individuals will feel inferior in a pro-eugenics society is true - do I have logical basis to suggest such a thing?
  2. #2
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Posts 264
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    It's an interesting question

    I think the breakthroughs that will allow surefire, easy gene alteration (namely targeted addition of genes and 100% effective gene delivery vectors) to people before their born will also allow gene alteration post-birth

    so I actual think it could be a non-issue, people who wish to tak advantage of gene alteration could simply get their genes altered
    "god means: "my invisible best friend" Comradered


    Desu?
  3. #3
    Join Date Mar 2003
    Location Sol system
    Posts 12,306
    Organisation
    Deniers of Messiahs
    Rep Power 137

    Default

    I'm not sure about alterinhg one's genetic material after birth - remember that you have billions of cells in your body, and I don't see them being changed quickly at all.

    But yes, it should be possible to correct any problems in the womb such as Down's Syndrome. It doesn't really have anything to do with pseudoscientific nazi-esque eugenics programs.
    The Human Progress Group

    Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
    Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains - Karl Marx
    Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
    The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky


    Check out my speculative fiction project: NOVA MUNDI
  4. #4
    Committed Revolutionary Committed User
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location 127.0.0.1
    Posts 10,131
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    I wouldn't mind correcting problems before birth as I'm sure that future technology would allow for this.

    Assuming we do not force people into doing something, should society promote voluntary eugenics policies? Not killing people of course, but, if a child could be born without a disability, or with a higher IQ, should this be encouraged?
    These types of people have a higher chance of finding a mate so there is a grater chance that their genes will be proliferated.
  5. #5
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location Alberta, Canada
    Posts 408
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I dont think the chance of a retard having children is less then an intelligent person. If anything a retard doesnt know how to use birth control. And a person who is just stupid probably doesnt either, and they are probably having sex earlier then intelligent people.
  6. #6
    Committed Revolutionary Committed User
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location 127.0.0.1
    Posts 10,131
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    I dont think the chance of a retard having children is less then an intelligent person.
    I'm saying that they have less of a chance to find a mate.

    If anything a retard doesnt know how to use birth control.
    If they are that slow then they are probably not living a normal life but rather in an institution or other.

    And a person who is just stupid probably doesnt either, and they are probably having sex earlier then intelligent people.
    Not really, their emotional maturity is a bit slower.
  7. #7
    Join Date May 2003
    Posts 3,964
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo+Jul 20 2006, 11:23 AM--> (Generalissimo @ Jul 20 2006, 11:23 AM) I dont think the chance of a retard having children is less then an intelligent person. If anything a retard doesnt know how to use birth control. And a person who is just stupid probably doesnt either, and they are probably having sex earlier then intelligent people. [/b]

    "Retard"

    You're an asshole.

    noXion
    I'm not sure about alterinhg one's genetic material after birth - remember that you have billions of cells in your body, and I don't see them being changed quickly at all.
    Somatic therapy is the genetic manipulation of somatic post birth cells and has been around just as long a germline therapy.

    Remember, somatic therapy targets specific groups of somatic cells and considering how rapid cells propagate, I doubt the time frame would be all that dramatic.
    "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." - Albert Einstein
  8. #8
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location Alberta, Canada
    Posts 408
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    How am i an asshole? Just because i dont want to change the words i use every decade when they become offensive so i can be politically correct. Retard actually meens something, i wasnt using it as an insult.

    And also i didnt meen the retard doesnt know how to put a condom on, i meant he is so stupid he wont put it on because he doesnt think of the risks.
  9. #9
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Posts 1,555
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo@Jul 20 2006, 10:45 PM
    How am i an asshole? Just because i dont want to change the words i use every decade when they become offensive so i can be politically correct. Retard actually meens something, i wasnt using it as an insult.

    And also i didnt meen the retard doesnt know how to put a condom on, i meant he is so stupid he wont put it on because he doesnt think of the risks.
    Your post was extremely ignorant (I use the word hear to refer to a lack of knowledge). Many people without mental retardation cannot function on their own - aside from sexual assault, they aren't a worry for reproduction. Furthermore, those who can sustain themselves have difficulty maintaing relationships (as their linguistic abilities typically are low) and the prospects for intercourse are limited. Furthermore, mentally retarded individuals do not gang together with their ilk and mate to degenerate society. Some of them happen to form relationships because they have similiar intellectual levels, but, if they can survive on their own, a poor sexual education choice is more likely due to common stupidity rather than anything involving their condition.

    Statistically, you may be correct that they have a higher chance of forgetting about protection or thinking they can get away with out it. After all, people with less intelligence are prone to less intelligence decisions. However, it is completely unjustified to generalize a population in such a way. Those people suffer enough.

    You may say that my rephrasing of your views is "what you meant," but the use of language is important. It makes the difference between someone getting offended and someone agreeing with you.
  10. #10
    Join Date Jun 2006
    Location Alberta, Canada
    Posts 408
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I wasnt only talking about retards, i was talking about people with low iq's in general.
  11. #11
    Join Date Dec 2005
    Posts 1,555
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo@Jul 21 2006, 12:58 AM
    I wasnt only talking about retards, i was talking about people with low iq's in general.
    Again, you would be generalizing. The amount of children produced by low IQ individuals in comparison to high IQ individuals is higher. However, that does not mean they all act in such a way.

    Furthermore, you claimed that less intelligent people have sex earlier. That is hard to say especially considering that more intellectual individuals reject religion and, consequently, have little reason to avoid sexual activity (assuming it is done safely).
  12. #12
    Join Date Jul 2004
    Location South East England
    Posts 324
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo@Jul 20 2006, 10:45 PM
    How am i an asshole? Just because i dont want to change the words i use every decade when they become offensive so i can be politically correct. Retard actually meens something, i wasnt using it as an insult.

    And also i didnt meen the retard doesnt know how to put a condom on, i meant he is so stupid he wont put it on because he doesnt think of the risks.
    So you wouldn't let them use condoms, you'd force them to be sterilised?
    One question, would you still penalise "undesirables" for having children?
    "The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos."
    - H. L. Mencken

    Anyone want a Gmail invite? PM me for one, I have 99 to give away.

    Social Networking Through Music - Last.fm
  13. #13
    Join Date Jan 2004
    Location Babakiueria
    Posts 10,096
    Organisation
    Sydney Copwatch
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo@Jul 21 2006, 10:58 AM
    I wasnt only talking about retards, i was talking about people with low iq's in general.
    What would you define as a 'low IQ'?
  14. #14
    Join Date Mar 2003
    Location Sol system
    Posts 12,306
    Organisation
    Deniers of Messiahs
    Rep Power 137

    Default

    It also brings up the nature vs nurture argument. Had Bush been brought up in a home that encouraged learning and cherished knowledge, would he be quite as dense as he is now?

    Personally, I'm leaning towards nurture in most cases. There a small minority of people who will be stupid throughout their lives, but you can usually spot them from a mile off. Most people are smart enough to hide their lack of education and critical thinking skills, unless they get into an argument.
    The Human Progress Group

    Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
    Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains - Karl Marx
    Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
    The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky


    Check out my speculative fiction project: NOVA MUNDI
  15. #15
    Join Date May 2004
    Location Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts 259
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    I'm not sure about alterinhg one's genetic material after birth - remember that you have billions of cells in your body, and I don't see them being changed quickly at all.
    It's quite possible, I believe the method uses the body to naturally manufacture the gene after it's introduced.
    <span style=\'color:green\'>
    &quot;If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.&quot; - J.R.R. Tolkien

    &quot;It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets - Voltaire
    </span>
  16. #16
    Join Date May 2003
    Posts 3,964
    Rep Power 19

    Default

    Originally posted by Generalissimo@Jul 20 2006, 03:45 PM
    How am i an asshole? Just because i dont want to change the words i use every decade when they become offensive so i can be politically correct. Retard actually meens something, i wasnt using it as an insult.

    And also i didnt meen the retard doesnt know how to put a condom on, i meant he is so stupid he wont put it on because he doesnt think of the risks.
    Silly little twit; the word "retard" has never been anything other than an insult from some jerkoff like yourself.
    &quot;It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&quot; - Albert Einstein
  17. #17
    Join Date May 2004
    Location Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts 259
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    "Mental retardation (also called mental handicap and the UK Mental Health Act (1983) defines mental impairment and severe mental impairment) is a term for a pattern of persistently slow learning of basic motor and language skills ("milestones") during childhood, and a significantly below-normal global intellectual capacity as an adult. One common criterion for diagnosis of mental retardation is a tested intelligence quotient (IQ) below 70."
    <span style=\'color:green\'>
    &quot;If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.&quot; - J.R.R. Tolkien

    &quot;It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets - Voltaire
    </span>
  18. #18
    Join Date Dec 2003
    Posts 264
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Back on topic...

    I&#39;m not sure about alterinhg one&#39;s genetic material after birth - remember that you have billions of cells in your body, and I don&#39;t see them being changed quickly at all.
    I had assumed mass gene engineering prior to birth would be predicated on the discovery of near 100% efficient delivery vectors that don&#39;t provoke immune response

    Otherwise I don&#39;t know how easily convinced people would be to do it - since a vector without near 100% efficiency will mean engineering pre-birth is a gamble.

    With a low cell count and each cell being progenitor of a variety of tissues a low chance of delivery of the gene you want will yield very random results as it would be possible the vector doesn&#39;t insert the gene at all or only to tissues that wouldn&#39;t benefit from it (anti-Alzheimers genes in your toes and not your brain won&#39;t help you)

    And if the vector doesn&#39;t provoke an immune response you can just keep applying it until all the cells take in the gene
    &quot;god means: &quot;my invisible best friend&quot; Comradered


    Desu?
  19. #19
    Join Date Apr 2004
    Posts 237
    Rep Power 0

    Default


    In fact, one could argue that there is a moral obligation to genetical alter our future generations. After all, the improvement of the gene pool could save humanity from some inconvienent and sometimes even painful realities.
    As time progresses the human gene pool will become more unstable no mater what we do....
  20. #20
    Join Date Mar 2003
    Location Sol system
    Posts 12,306
    Organisation
    Deniers of Messiahs
    Rep Power 137

    Default

    Originally posted by ZeroPain@Jul 23 2006, 07:49 AM

    In fact, one could argue that there is a moral obligation to genetical alter our future generations. After all, the improvement of the gene pool could save humanity from some inconvienent and sometimes even painful realities.
    As time progresses the human gene pool will become more unstable no mater what we do....
    Nonsense. If it&#39;s broke, we can fix it.
    The Human Progress Group

    Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker - Mikhail Bakunin
    Workers of the world unite; you have nothing to lose but your chains - Karl Marx
    Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value - R. Buckminster Fuller
    The important thing is not to be human but to be humane - Eliezer S. Yudkowsky


    Check out my speculative fiction project: NOVA MUNDI

Similar Threads

  1. Eugenics
    By bushdog in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12th November 2005, 02:01
  2. latest news on genetic engineering
    By pedro san pedro in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 3rd March 2004, 20:41
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 16th June 2003, 23:22
  4. Genetic Engineering / Eugenics
    By in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 31st December 1969, 23:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread