I agree man, i think protests need to become more militant, you can only go so far being peaceful, and i think we've reached that point already.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
I saw this on infoshop
Doesn't anyone think we need to start becoming a bit more aggressive? I don't feel I'm accomplishing anything by doing this. If we're going to do something, we're going to have to go in there and try to disrupt the event by any means neccesary. I'm sick and tired of playing by the cops rules and being subject to this stupid police-state style freedom of speech. We should start looking for trouble. Literally.
"Idealists foolish enough to throw caution to the winds have advanced mankind and have enriched the world.
"The political arena leaves one no alternative, one must either be a dunce or a rogue. "
-Emma Goldman
I agree man, i think protests need to become more militant, you can only go so far being peaceful, and i think we've reached that point already.
"A society which makes eating a privilege, not a right, has no right to exist" ~ Jerry Rubin
"Sacred cows make the tastiest hamburgers" Abbie Hoffman
SDS is still in the beginning stages of building a national network and has alot of structural work to do with in the coming months. I am not a pacifist and I am not oppossed to using violence as a tactic, but to openly call for violent confrontation at an event where the President is speaking, that's suicidal. Planned street fights ussually don't work (as seen with the Days of Rage), however leaving events open for violence is a different stor. We need to pick our battles and apply tactics that will help further our movement - applying violence to this situation would only help spread a negative view of SDS. However, the violence at the port Olympia, Washington where SDSers confronted the pigs and stopped the shipping of war materials and troops (in my opinion) had a positive effect on our movement and has served to inspire many SDSers, including myself.