Thread: Russia 'gave Iraq intelligence'

Results 1 to 15 of 15

  1. #1
    Join Date May 2003
    Location america
    Posts 673
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Russia 'gave Iraq intelligence'

    Saddam Hussein's role proved disastrous, the report says
    Russia provided Saddam Hussein with intelligence on US military moves in the opening days of the US-led invasion in 2003, a Pentagon report has said.
    Russia passed the details through its Baghdad ambassador, the report said. Russia has not commented on the claim.

    One piece of intelligence passed on was false, and in fact helped a key US deception effort, the report concluded.

    The report also quoted an Iraqi memo which mentioned Russian "sources" at the US military headquarters in Qatar.

    "The information that the Russians have collected from their sources inside the American Central Command in Doha is that the United States is convinced that occupying Iraqi cities are [sic] impossible," said the Iraqi document, quoted by the Pentagon report.

    Surprise attack

    The false intelligence apparently passed on by Russia concerned the date the US was likely to start its main attack on Baghdad.

    A document from the Iraqi foreign minister to Saddam Hussein, dated 2 April 2003, and quoting Russian intelligence, said the attack would not begin until the Army's 4th Infantry Division arrived about 15 April.

    This reinforced an impression that the US military were trying to create, in order to catch Iraqis by surprise with an earlier attack, the Pentagon report said.


    Troop movements towards Baghdad were passed on, the US says

    In fact, the assault on the Iraqi capital began well before the 4th Division arrived, and the city fell about a week before 15 April.

    The same Iraqi memo said that US troops were moving to cut off Baghdad from the south, east and north.

    "Significantly, the (Iraqi) regime was also receiving intelligence from the Russians that fed suspicions that the attack out of Kuwait was merely a diversion," the report said.

    The Pentagon report noted that there were Russian business interests in Iraqi oil, and a senior US military spokesman said Russia's actions were being seen as "driven by economic interests".

    Saddam 'interference'

    The report also said Saddam Hussein's inept military leadership was a key factor in the defeat of his forces.

    "The largest contributing factor to the complete defeat of Iraq's military forces was the continued interference by Saddam (Hussein)," it said.

    The BBC's Pentagon correspondent, Adam Brookes, says that overall the report portrays Saddam Hussein as chronically out of touch with reality - preoccupied with the prevention of domestic unrest and with the threat posed by Iran.

    The 210-page report - Iraqi Perspectives Project - aims to help US officials understand in hindsight how the Iraqi military prepared for and fought during the invasion.

    There are both classified and unclassified versions of the report.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4843394.stm
    Coke Watch

    Sweatshop Free

    Your political compass
    Economic Left/Right: -9.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.82
  2. #2
    Committed Revolutionary Committed User
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location 127.0.0.1
    Posts 10,131
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    Either Russian intelligence is terrible or the Russians fed misinformation on purpose. This whole report may also have been false as well. I guess we'll just have to wait for Russia to issue a comment if they do so at all.
  3. #3
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    "The information that the Russians have collected from their sources inside the American Central Command in Doha is that the United States is convinced that occupying Iraqi cities are [sic] impossible," said the Iraqi document, quoted by the Pentagon report.
    Apparently the Russians had a false sense that American military strategy was rational or realistic.

  4. #4
    Join Date May 2003
    Location america
    Posts 673
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Coke Watch

    Sweatshop Free

    Your political compass
    Economic Left/Right: -9.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.82
  5. #5
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    er its kinda one of those things that they'd deny whethe it was true or false.

  6. #6
    Join Date May 2003
    Location america
    Posts 673
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.
    Coke Watch

    Sweatshop Free

    Your political compass
    Economic Left/Right: -9.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.82
  7. #7
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Posts 483
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by WUOrevolt@Mar 25 2006, 01:26 PM
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.
    And why in the world would they do that? Seriously whats the point? Most americans don't agree with the war anyways and the Russians don't give a damn about the war either. Obviously, American propaganda efforts are best spent elsewhere.

    "Idealists foolish enough to throw caution to the winds have advanced mankind and have enriched the world.

    "The political arena leaves one no alternative, one must either be a dunce or a rogue. "
    -Emma Goldman
  8. #8
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location London, England
    Posts 100
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by WUOrevolt@Mar 25 2006, 06:26 PM
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.
    When you say bad, in what way exactly?
    <span style=\'color:red\'>&quot;Isn&#39;t the way the corperate controlled media made it look like/Read between the lines and free your mind/Revolution is the birth of equality/And the anti-thesis to oppression/But this is only built for real motherfuckers&quot;<span style=\'color:gray\'>Immortal Technique</span></span>
    </div><table border=\'0\' align=\'center\' width=\'95%\' cellpadding=\'3\' cellspacing=\'1\'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id=\'QUOTE\'>KoreanFob
    if McDonald&#39;s is legal...why not marijuana?</td></tr></table><div class=\'signature\'>
    Colombia Solidarity Campaign<span style=\'color:red\'>¤ ¤ ¤</span>Killer Cola - Target: Colombian Labour
  9. #9
    Join Date May 2003
    Location america
    Posts 673
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Originally posted by dislatino+Mar 26 2006, 12:26 AM--> (dislatino @ Mar 26 2006, 12:26 AM)
    WUOrevolt
    @Mar 25 2006, 06:26 PM
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.
    When you say bad, in what way exactly? [/b]
    That they didnt go to war for reasons other than they knew saddam had no wmds in Iraq.
    Coke Watch

    Sweatshop Free

    Your political compass
    Economic Left/Right: -9.75
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.82
  10. #10
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location London, England
    Posts 100
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by WUOrevolt+Mar 25 2006, 08:32 PM--> (WUOrevolt @ Mar 25 2006, 08:32 PM)
    Originally posted by [email protected] 26 2006, 12:26 AM
    WUOrevolt
    @Mar 25 2006, 06:26 PM
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.
    When you say bad, in what way exactly?
    That they didnt go to war for reasons other than they knew saddam had no wmds in Iraq. [/b]
    Oh ok, i think i understand it now, so what will this mean? say it gets proven somehow that the russians were involved, would it have any sort of direct effect on anything?
    <span style=\'color:red\'>&quot;Isn&#39;t the way the corperate controlled media made it look like/Read between the lines and free your mind/Revolution is the birth of equality/And the anti-thesis to oppression/But this is only built for real motherfuckers&quot;<span style=\'color:gray\'>Immortal Technique</span></span>
    </div><table border=\'0\' align=\'center\' width=\'95%\' cellpadding=\'3\' cellspacing=\'1\'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id=\'QUOTE\'>KoreanFob
    if McDonald&#39;s is legal...why not marijuana?</td></tr></table><div class=\'signature\'>
    Colombia Solidarity Campaign<span style=\'color:red\'>¤ ¤ ¤</span>Killer Cola - Target: Colombian Labour
  11. #11
    Join Date Jan 2006
    Posts 700
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    QUOTE (WUOrevolt @ Mar 25 2006, 08:32 PM)
    QUOTE (dislatino @ Mar 26 2006, 12:26 AM)
    QUOTE (WUOrevolt @ Mar 25 2006, 06:26 PM)
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.

    When you say bad, in what way exactly?

    That they didnt go to war for reasons other than they knew saddam had no wmds in Iraq.

    Oh ok, i think i understand it now, so what will this mean? say it gets proven somehow that the russians were involved, would it have any sort of direct effect on anything?
    It means that the US will have mounting bad relations with vladimir poutines government. It could mean increased US invovlvment with russia, potentially leading to war, or sanctions or some form of US backed coup or civil war in several years.
    NEVER WORK
    FUCK M68
    LOVE
    LIVE
    RIOT
    all caps, all insurrection, all the time
  12. #12
    Join Date Mar 2006
    Location London, England
    Posts 100
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by razboz@Mar 25 2006, 08:51 PM
    QUOTE (WUOrevolt @ Mar 25 2006, 08:32 PM)
    QUOTE (dislatino @ Mar 26 2006, 12:26 AM)
    QUOTE (WUOrevolt @ Mar 25 2006, 06:26 PM)
    It seems like the American administration is trying to make Russia look bad for their non involvement in the war.

    When you say bad, in what way exactly?

    That they didnt go to war for reasons other than they knew saddam had no wmds in Iraq.

    Oh ok, i think i understand it now, so what will this mean? say it gets proven somehow that the russians were involved, would it have any sort of direct effect on anything?
    It means that the US will have mounting bad relations with vladimir poutines government. It could mean increased US invovlvment with russia, potentially leading to war, or sanctions or some form of US backed coup or civil war in several years.
    I see, well "if" it gets to that stage surely the russians won&#39;t stand for it, with the situations that the U.S have gotten themselves into in the past, it looks like force would be thier only option.
    <span style=\'color:red\'>&quot;Isn&#39;t the way the corperate controlled media made it look like/Read between the lines and free your mind/Revolution is the birth of equality/And the anti-thesis to oppression/But this is only built for real motherfuckers&quot;<span style=\'color:gray\'>Immortal Technique</span></span>
    </div><table border=\'0\' align=\'center\' width=\'95%\' cellpadding=\'3\' cellspacing=\'1\'><tr><td>QUOTE </td></tr><tr><td id=\'QUOTE\'>KoreanFob
    if McDonald&#39;s is legal...why not marijuana?</td></tr></table><div class=\'signature\'>
    Colombia Solidarity Campaign<span style=\'color:red\'>¤ ¤ ¤</span>Killer Cola - Target: Colombian Labour
  13. #13
    Join Date Mar 2005
    Posts 954
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    Theres major rivalry between the US and Russia, because Russia is backing regimes in central asia with state-controlled economies, whereas Washington wants them to open up to (American naturally) Capital.

    It&#39;s basically part of inter-imperialist rivalry, as part of a war of control of the regions gas and oil - fought by proxies like Yanucovich and Karimov.
    Join The Scottish Socialist Party - For An Independent Socialist Scotland!
    www.scottishsocialistparty.org
    Viva Cuba Libre! Defend Socialist Cuba!
    www.cuba-solidarity.org
    Victory to the Intifada!
    www.scottishpsc.org.uk/
    Scottish Socialist Youth - Fighting Capitalism, Hypocrisy and War!
    www.ssy.org.uk
  14. #14
    blood thirsty tree hater Committed User
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Location netherlands
    Posts 3,150
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    Originally posted by Janus@Mar 25 2006, 01:39 AM
    Either Russian intelligence is terrible or the Russians fed misinformation on purpose. This whole report may also have been false as well. I guess we&#39;ll just have to wait for Russia to issue a comment if they do so at all.
    perhaps they orchestrated this in an attempt to make the iraqi regime collapse as fast as possible.
    hoping to save lifes by shortening the war as much as possible.
    You are entering the vicinity of an area adjacent to a location. The kind of place where there might be a monster, or some kind of weird mirror...
  15. #15
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 327
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    anyway does it mather people ?

    sadam lost the war...the inteligence wasnt usefull to him... his army killed like 13 amerikans... great intelligence it must have been... real usefull..
    &#33; Hasta la victoria siempre &#33;

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th February 2006, 17:15
  2. Reservist Says Intelligence Led Iraq Abuse
    By Seraph in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 6th August 2004, 21:55
  3. War in Iraq not over - Stratfor intelligence report.
    By peaccenicked in forum Newswire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12th April 2003, 00:34
  4. GRU intel from Iraq - Russian Military Intelligence reports
    By suffianr in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st March 2003, 12:48
  5. Russia Shifts Ties With Iraq
    By RedCeltic in forum Newswire
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11th July 2002, 01:03

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread