Thread: Green revolution

Results 1 to 7 of 7

  1. #1
    Join Date May 2005
    Posts 52
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    I would like to hear your thoughts on a Green revolution for those of you who dont know, the Green Revolution is the increase in food production stemming from the improved strains of wheat, rice, maize and other cereals in the 1960s developed by Dr Norman Borlaug in Mexico and others under the sponsorship of the Rockefeller Foundation. This increased the crop yield in India, Pakistan, Philippines, Mexico, Sri Lanka and other underdeveloped countries.
    blah blah
  2. #2
    Committed Revolutionary Committed User
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location 127.0.0.1
    Posts 10,131
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    The Green Revolution was crucial in helping to support the world's growing population. Except for some original problems in some of the countries because of the susceptibility of the new breeds to disease particularly mites whose predators had been killed by pesticides.

    History has shown us what can occur when dependability on one or just a few crops. Therefore, this loss of biodiversity could have potentially devastating consequences later.
    Pollution by the heavy pesticide and fertilizer use is also extremely harmful to local wildlife and humans as well particularly in Third World countries.
    Negative social changes have also occured as a result of the Green revolution. First off, many of the farmers have lost due to their inability to compete with the cheap new crop prices and the large agricultural companies. This has resulted in greater poverty and movement to the urban areas.
    Furthermore, farmers are now dependent on corporations for seeds since the new hybrid seeds are sterile. This emphasizes the loss of biodiversity and as said may have negative influences in the future.

    Though the Green Revolution has had some major successes, I don't think that they can be kept up for long. I think that there should be at least some integrated farming. After all, diversity is the best survival tool that we have.
  3. #3
    Join Date Sep 2003
    Posts 1,609
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    The Green Revolution was crucial in helping to support the world's growing population
    Though the Green Revolution has had some major successes, I don't think that they can be kept up for long
    So, uh, for or against...?
    El pueblo unido jamás será vencido
  4. #4
    Join Date Jun 2005
    Posts 2,463
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Do I support the advancment the green revolution has brought in agriculture? Of course. If I'm not mistaken there isnt free reign with these advancements (globalization), so they should obviously be free to use.
  5. #5
    Join Date Jun 2005
    Posts 51
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    The Green Revolution, like most scientific advances, had/have the capability of advancing the progression of humans. I support the GR on the grounds of it making more food for the rapidly growing world population, but I do not support it for the use of globalization and exploitation of third world countries.

    A pencil in the proper hands can be a weapon, the GR in the proper hands, can be a tool of Socialism.
    The biggest threat to the Modern State is the Working Class, and it is undeniable that we, the working class, have a large amount of influence on state affairs-- even when we choose to ignore them. So far, we have forced the State to cede its power in small increments, only to have it keep overall power in the long run.



  6. #6
    Join Date Mar 2003
    Posts 1,914
    Rep Power 17

    Default

    Well said omegaflare.
    DOWN WITH JAPANESE IMPERIALISM!
    Link in RevLeft.
    The Left needs to spank out a number of armchair theorists and kids who cloak themselves with Marxism as excuse for their problems. Exclusion is needed when the cause is hampered. We are supposed to be the examples and persuaders. Assume responsibility, fuckwit!
    Full Text: China's Peaceful Development Road
    (Official White Paper)

    Link.
  7. #7
    Committed Revolutionary Committed User
    Join Date Nov 2005
    Location 127.0.0.1
    Posts 10,131
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    Yes, the Green Revolution has helped provide food for the population. However, it has also made many people dependent on non-diversified farming. This can have potentially devastating results, particularly in third world countries, if a blight were to damage the hybrid crops. I definitely think that more integrated farming should be used and that emphasis sholuldn't just be placed on quanitity.

Similar Threads

  1. Going Green?
    By AAFCE in forum Practice
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 27th January 2008, 13:22
  2. Blair demands green 'revolution'
    By Janus in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30th March 2006, 19:42
  3. Green Day ?
    By Sovietsky Souyuz in forum Cultural
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12th September 2004, 15:29
  4. Green Day/Green monday
    By shyguywannadie in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22nd February 2004, 05:35
  5. GREEN VICTORY IN NEW YORK - New Paltz just turned green
    By RedCeltic in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 8th May 2003, 02:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread