Thread: The Tube Shooting

Results 1 to 18 of 18

  1. #1
    Join Date Jun 2005
    Posts 2,474
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Should metropolitan police chief Sir Ian Blair quit over the tube shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes and should the officer who shot Jean Charles de Menezes be prosicuted for murder (at the moment he's being charged for manslaughetr but thats all ive heard)?
  2. #2
    Join Date May 2005
    Location A hole in the ground.
    Posts 800
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    1: Maybe but definitely if it gets more out of hand.
    2: Definitely.
    Economic Left/Right: -8.88
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.05

    And unnatural, irrational, sinful, wicked, unjust, devilish and tyrannical it is, for any man whatsoever - spiritual or temporal, clergyman or layman - to appropriate and assume unto himself a power, authority and jurisdiction to rule, govern, or reign over any sort of men in the world without their free consent...

    John Lilburne, 1647

    I'm not anti-intellectual, I'm just not an intellectual.

    Capitalism will eat itself.
  3. #3
    Join Date Jun 2005
    Posts 2,474
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    i cant find any source but i watched on the bbc last night that the cctv fotage of the tube shooting has "gone missing" so id say its getting out of hand
  4. #4
    Join Date May 2005
    Location United States
    Posts 84
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    Shooting a innocent human being in the face repeatedly because they "suspected" he was a "terrorist" is no excuse. All who are responsible deserve to be tried for murder as the act is unexcusable "mistake" or not.
  5. #5
    Join Date Jul 2005
    Posts 1,103
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by ZACKist@Aug 25 2005, 11:38 AM
    Shooting a innocent human being in the face repeatedly because they "suspected" he was a "terrorist" is no excuse. All who are responsible deserve to be tried for murder as the act is unexcusable "mistake" or not.
    Quoted for truth.
  6. #6
    fire to the prisons Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 6,063
    Rep Power 100

    Default

    In my humble opinion, the first question was more important than the second.
    The chief officer should be severly punished as an example to the rest of the police force, that in this world, order is enforced from above. If the regular cops don't see this, they will continue to do the horrible acts we have seen in the past. Punishing the chief officer will have a huge effect on other chief officers and might dent this wall of ignorance.

    As for the officer in question, he should be jailed for life under the title "first degree murder". No questions asked.

    -- August
    If we have no business with the construction of the future or with organizing it for all time, there can still be no doubt about the task confronting us at present: the ruthless criticism of the existing order, ruthless in that it will shrink neither from its own discoveries, nor from conflict with the powers that be.
    - Karl Marx
  7. #7
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 75
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    The UK doesn't have a system of first/second degree murder or whatever, its simply manslaughter or murder (may soon be reformed).

    The whole operation was obviously an absolute cock up and from the information that seems to be coming out there were definatly mistakes made by the officer in question and his team, and its baffling why they actually shot the bloke. As for the Ian Blair, its laughable that he wasn't 'in full possession of the facts' after the operation when he made those press statements, he was obviously trying to cover something up and should be held accountable.
  8. #8
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Location Glasgow Scotland
    Posts 121
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    1. Yes, he should resign. For two reasons.... 1) an innocent man was shot dead by his police officers on his orders and 2) its crystal clear that a cover-up operation is happening in the offices of the Metropolitan Police.

    2. The cop who fired the fatal shot should be jailed for life...but in the british jail system he'll be out in 5 years. Life sentences over here are a joke, they usually amount to 10 years at most.
    If you tremble indignation at every injustice then you are a comrade of mine. - Ernesto Che Guevara

    A lie told often enough becomes the truth. - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

    In our age there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia. - George Orwell

    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. - George Orwell
  9. #9
    Join Date Oct 2004
    Location The Rooftops!
    Posts 464
    Rep Power 14

    Default

    Originally posted by Commandante_Ant@Aug 26 2005, 07:51 AM
    2. The cop who fired the fatal shot should be jailed for life...but in the british jail system he'll be out in 5 years. Life sentences over here are a joke, they usually amount to 10 years at most.
    If I went to jail for ten years now, I wouldn't walk the streets until I was 24.
    I would lose my entire youth. Thats a serious penalty. IMHO there's no point in a life sentence. Why reform them if they will never be free again?
    You can call me an idiot as much as you want, but we both know I am not. I've out-debated countless commie pukes in my years here, and you would be well advised to shut your mouth less you be out-done by my logic as so many others have.

    Capitalist Imperialist, trying desperately to look hard

    THE SEXY CHIN REGISTER - SIGN UP TODAY
  10. #10
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 75
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    I highly doubt he'll get done for murder, whenever a copper gets put on trial for 'accidentally' shooting someone over here (and it happens more than you might think) pressure from high-ups in the Met usually gets them off with a suspended manslaughter sentence at the most. But yea if it did go to murder I doubt the guy would spend alot of time in the clink.
  11. #11
    Join Date Jun 2005
    Posts 2,474
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Well the policemen who shot the scottsman with a table leg on the grounds that he was an irishman with a gun working for the IRA was only discharged from the force was he not? (correct me if im wrong)
  12. #12
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Location Imperialist Britain
    Posts 3,139
    Rep Power 20

    Default

    Dont really see the point in imprisoning the police officer. If it wasnt him it would have been any other officer, he was just the unlucky one who did it, so punishing him wouldnt serve any purpose, as it wasnt as though it was his thinking or his fault.

    As for the Police Chief, he should be put in jail for his lies to the public, but most importantly he should be put in jail in cells seperate to Blair and Clarke, for their masterminding which is the REAL reason why this young innocent Brazilian was murdered, this should happen, if were really looking for justice.
    <span style=\'color:red\'>www.marxist.com Committee for a Marxist International</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Proleteriat of the world unite&#33; We have nothing to lose but our chains&#33;</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>HandsOffVenezuela in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers and the Venezuelan Revolution</span>
  13. #13
    Join Date May 2005
    Location Kent, England
    Posts 563
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The chief officer should be tried, as well as those involved in the planning of the operation, for crimes against the British people.

    The death of the man was unfortunate and questionable but i see the crime of lying to the people repeatedly as more serious.

    Slim.
  14. #14
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Posts 75
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by Skinz@Aug 26 2005, 09:47 AM
    Well the policemen who shot the scottsman with a table leg on the grounds that he was an irishman with a gun working for the IRA was only discharged from the force was he not? (correct me if im wrong)
    Exactly my point, the bloke lost his job. He didn&#39;t end up with 10 years in the nick, I guess the Met just thought that was the lightest thing he could get off with without having to go to prison on getting a suspended sentence or what not...
  15. #15
    Join Date May 2005
    Location Kent, England
    Posts 563
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Or without a public outcry perhaps...

    The police didnt care about justice or the family of the victim. They acted on the human instinct of self preservation, an emotion of weakness. Of cowardice, lack of honour, lack of concern for the people, lack of proletarian feeling at all. The yare not one of us. The police who try and cover things up are in bourgeoise territory.
  16. #16
    Join Date Aug 2005
    Location Glasgow Scotland
    Posts 121
    Rep Power 13

    Default

    Originally posted by Kez@Aug 26 2005, 10:49 AM
    Dont really see the point in imprisoning the police officer. If it wasnt him it would have been any other officer, he was just the unlucky one who did it, so punishing him wouldnt serve any purpose, as it wasnt as though it was his thinking or his fault.

    I do see the point in sending him to jail. The reports of the shooting were that while an officer restrained Jean Charles, grabbing his arms, he was then shot by another officer. He never said anything, he shot the man in cold blood. He is a murderer and he deserves to be punished.

    The orders were to shoot to kill but Jean Charles had been restrained...even if he had a bomb, he couldnt activate it as his hands and arms had been constrained so he was shot unlawfully.
    If you tremble indignation at every injustice then you are a comrade of mine. - Ernesto Che Guevara

    A lie told often enough becomes the truth. - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

    In our age there is no such thing as &#39;keeping out of politics.&#39; All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia. - George Orwell

    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever. - George Orwell
  17. #17
    Join Date Oct 2001
    Location Imperialist Britain
    Posts 3,139
    Rep Power 20

    Default

    Correct it was a murder, but would it have been any different if it were any other police officer?

    Was it the fault of the individual or the position?
    <span style=\'color:red\'>www.marxist.com Committee for a Marxist International</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>Proleteriat of the world unite&#33; We have nothing to lose but our chains&#33;</span>

    <span style=\'color:red\'>HandsOffVenezuela in solidarity with the Venezuelan workers and the Venezuelan Revolution</span>
  18. #18
    Join Date May 2005
    Location Kent, England
    Posts 563
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I feel that it was the responsibility of the position. The commanders should not hand out guns to their subordinates if they do not know the consequences. Its like if our PM gave a mental patient an AK 47 and told him to look out for terrorists.

    The authorities placed a gun in the hands of someone who could not be trusted. The authorities placed everyones personal safety at risk. Therefore, the superiors should take the blame and the responsibility.

Similar Threads

  1. Anti-ara You Tube Video
    By Comrade Marcel in forum Action & Anti-Fascism
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30th July 2006, 17:19
  2. London tube strike set to go ahead
    By Conghaileach in forum Newswire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th January 2006, 15:40
  3. Another Tube Strike
    By Amusing Scrotum in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th December 2005, 19:40
  4. London Tube Sign
    By plokhoe in forum Cultural
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 1st August 2005, 17:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread