Thread: 313C7 iVi4RX, please prove

Results 1 to 9 of 9

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 1,682
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    That your motives for your beliefs are logical.

    Naturally, being so fond of objectivity and rationality, I can assume that your proof will include:

    Both null and research hypotheses.

    Data, and a valid model that I can replicate.

    These and other requirements of research are available in Exploring Research, 5th Edition, by Neil Salkind.


    This should be fun...
    I have met neither a religious fanatic nor a hard-core leftist whose arguments did not make me laugh.

    The reason is that their arguments are actually one and the same: "it'll work because I believe in it, even though all available evidence is to the contrary."

  2. #2
    Join Date Jul 2003
    Posts 2,893
    Organisation
    Lincoln's Underground Network
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    First off, this is philosophical/political, not directly pertaining to religion; wrong forum.

    I didn't say "motives for [my] beliefs are logical," to correct you for at least the third time I said:

    I can prove "my motive for acting and my reasoning for how I act."

    If you continue to distort the topic I am going to stop wasting my time on this.


    Okay, where do you want to start? I am not going to write you a book.
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]¡El Pueblo Unido Jamás Será Vencido![/FONT]
    __________________
    Lincoln's Underground Network Radical left Radio

    Tell me what you think of the Communiqués

    Show solidarity through kindness and empathy, join Respectful Discussion Activists

    313C7 iVi4RX to my oldschool comrades -EM-
  3. #3
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 1,682
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Dumbass, I am a restricted member so I am limited to this forum.

    Besides, you placed no such qualifiers on this when you demanded I start a new topic. Why all the sudden do you have qualifiers now?

    I didn't say "motives for [my] beliefs are logical,"
    Yes, I am afraid you did until you changed your mind.

    I asked: "You cannot prove your political philosophy is correct, can you? Do you have any empirical evidence that it is "correct" and that others are wrong?""

    You responded: "I have logic."

    Therefore you were claiming that your political philosophy and your motives for it are logical.

    Since you claim logic requires proof, then provide it.

    If you continue to distort the topic I am going to stop wasting my time on this.
    A loser always provides himself an easy out to save face.

    I've got $5 says you take it.
    I have met neither a religious fanatic nor a hard-core leftist whose arguments did not make me laugh.

    The reason is that their arguments are actually one and the same: "it'll work because I believe in it, even though all available evidence is to the contrary."

  4. #4
    Join Date Jul 2003
    Posts 2,893
    Organisation
    Lincoln's Underground Network
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Originally posted by t_wolves_fan@May 4 2005, 06:58 AM
    Dumbass, I am a restricted member so I am limited to this forum.
    You are restricted to the Religion forum? Hmmm; bullshit.

    Besides, you placed no such qualifiers on this when you demanded I start a new topic. Why all the sudden do you have qualifiers now?
    It isn't that big of a deal, I just thought you might put it in the right place...

    I didn't say "motives for [my] beliefs are logical,"
    Yes, I am afraid you did until you changed your mind.

    I asked: "You cannot prove your political philosophy is correct, can you? Do you have any empirical evidence that it is "correct" and that others are wrong?""

    You responded: "I have logic."

    Therefore you were claiming that your political philosophy and your motives for it are logical.

    Since you claim logic requires proof, then provide it.
    I haven't changed my mind, I just never stated "motives for [my] beliefs are logical," before you claimed I did. This is all inane anyway; do you want to ask some fucking questions or not? I will validate the statement I made.

    If you continue to distort the topic I am going to stop wasting my time on this.
    A loser always provides himself an easy out to save face.

    I've got $5 says you take it.
    ...and you can keep your damn money if you stay on topic; how about you send it to Malte if you don’t? I would say it is the person incapable of staying on topic that provides himself an easy out to save face; avoidance.

    Can we get to the topic now? Perhaps you would rather "save face?"
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]¡El Pueblo Unido Jamás Será Vencido![/FONT]
    __________________
    Lincoln's Underground Network Radical left Radio

    Tell me what you think of the Communiqués

    Show solidarity through kindness and empathy, join Respectful Discussion Activists

    313C7 iVi4RX to my oldschool comrades -EM-
  5. #5
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 1,682
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Thought so.

    I've axed my question. Answer it.
    I have met neither a religious fanatic nor a hard-core leftist whose arguments did not make me laugh.

    The reason is that their arguments are actually one and the same: "it'll work because I believe in it, even though all available evidence is to the contrary."

  6. #6
    Join Date Jul 2003
    Posts 2,893
    Organisation
    Lincoln's Underground Network
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Originally posted by t_wolves_fan@May 4 2005, 10:36 AM
    Thought so.

    I've axed my question. Answer it.
    You have asked one question originating in this thread:

    Why all the sudden do you have qualifiers now?
    ...and that was irrelevant to the topic of discussion.

    I said ask a question on topic (on proof of my statement); no more games.
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]¡El Pueblo Unido Jamás Será Vencido![/FONT]
    __________________
    Lincoln's Underground Network Radical left Radio

    Tell me what you think of the Communiqués

    Show solidarity through kindness and empathy, join Respectful Discussion Activists

    313C7 iVi4RX to my oldschool comrades -EM-
  7. #7
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 1,682
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Read the title of this thread and the first sentence in my post, dimwit.

    Waiting...

    tick tock, tick tock.
    I have met neither a religious fanatic nor a hard-core leftist whose arguments did not make me laugh.

    The reason is that their arguments are actually one and the same: "it'll work because I believe in it, even though all available evidence is to the contrary."

  8. #8
    Join Date Jul 2003
    Posts 2,893
    Organisation
    Lincoln's Underground Network
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Originally posted by t_wolves_fan@May 4 2005, 08:04 PM
    Read the title of this thread and the first sentence in my post, dimwit.
    Okay, you made a request, not a question. Don't blame me if you don't know the difference.

    Waiting...

    tick tock, tick tock.
    Keep insulting me; I don't really give a fuck and I am done here for now, unless you decide to ask a valid question.
    [FONT=Trebuchet MS]¡El Pueblo Unido Jamás Será Vencido![/FONT]
    __________________
    Lincoln's Underground Network Radical left Radio

    Tell me what you think of the Communiqués

    Show solidarity through kindness and empathy, join Respectful Discussion Activists

    313C7 iVi4RX to my oldschool comrades -EM-
  9. #9
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location Seattle, WA
    Posts 1,682
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by 313C7 iVi4RX+May 5 2005, 06:52 AM--> (313C7 iVi4RX @ May 5 2005, 06:52 AM)
    t_wolves_fan
    @May 4 2005, 08:04 PM
    Read the title of this thread and the first sentence in my post, dimwit.
    Okay, you made a request, not a question. Don't blame me if you don't know the difference.

    Waiting...

    tick tock, tick tock.
    Keep insulting me; I don't really give a fuck and I am done here for now, unless you decide to ask a valid question. [/b]
    Thought so.

    Fine, give up.
    I have met neither a religious fanatic nor a hard-core leftist whose arguments did not make me laugh.

    The reason is that their arguments are actually one and the same: "it'll work because I believe in it, even though all available evidence is to the contrary."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread