Please cite the specific reference.
Results 41 to 55 of 55
The way I see it,is as a million questions with very few answers. The biggest out of place is the attitude of the military in preventing the disaster. I heard they took 45 minutes to scramble (I believe this was after the first plane hit.) not only that, but when the world trade centre was built, FAA regulations were enacted;
!) If a plane flies within 12 miles of the building, out of normal flight path it will be warned to back off
2) If the plane reaches 5 miles, they will threaten to shoot it down
3) Within 3 miles the plane can legally be shot down
None of these regulations were enacted on the day....where were the military? They have jets on standby very nearby, why didn't they scamble? why did the president take so long to be informed? Why did a plane headed to San Francisco end up in new york over an hour later, before anyone did anything?
So many questions. So few answers. Of course an investigation would solve this, but why hasn't there been one? (yet another question)
The trouble with conspiracy theories is that the best ones are always based enough on truth to warrant people's fears. Why shouldn't we ask these questions? I do not believe it is unpatriotic or anti-american to criticise the goverment. they were at least partly at fault through inaction and negligence, and should be held to account as such.
Please cite the specific reference.
no it means i see outside the propaganda. terrorrists usualy dont fuk themselves without gaining anything, they didnt gain anything, secondly why wouldnt the usa do it? give me one good reason.
stop asking the opressor for freedom, eliminate the opressor and take your freedom
And another thing.
This "Controversial Video" (not the one in my original message) that the U$ said they couldnt release because it might conatain "secret messages" ...bullshit.... was eventually shown anyway. I think this little show they put on with the "secret messages" was just something to help aid the desire to see thses tapes first of all. And second of all, this made Osama and his croney terrorists seem like some secret spy agency with secret codes. All aiding in the suspicion of they average american citizen. It6 sorta gave them the feeling that these men were unstoppable and should be elimenated.
The church is not only filled with lies, deception, threats, and bullshit...but now is overrun with child groping priests!
"a bayonet is a weapon with a worker at both ends"
"I'd rather vote for something I want and not get it than vote for something I don't want, and get it."
oh my god.
thats funny.
And i have always questoned the response of the military throughout this.
I fwe can have planes up in the air from then until now, why couldt these planes (that are supposed to be always on standby) get up and shoot down the planes heading for the towers???
These planes (passenger plane) were scheduled flights and had a flight path. Once these planes were off the flight path...what was said between the pilot and the base?
The church is not only filled with lies, deception, threats, and bullshit...but now is overrun with child groping priests!
Yes, it's quite incredible that so many irregularities exist, and yet, much remains unanswered. The best thing is, we will probably never know...
And Vodun, stop being Mr. SmartyPants and go look up some civil aviation websites or something...Citing references is up to individual preference, if you are so curious, you'd best check it out yourself.
The prolonged barrage engulfed Zero-One in the glow of a thousand suns. But unlike their former masters with their delicate flesh, the machines had little to fear of the bombs' radiation and heat. Thus did Zero-One's troops advance outwards in every direction. And one after another, mankind surrendered its territories. So the leaders of men conceived of their most desperate strategy yet. A final solution: the destruction of the sky.
-- The 2nd Renaissance (Part2), Animatrix
This Osama thing reminds me of a photo that the soviets did in the end of WWII claiming to be the bodie of hitler dead, the photo was fake, and its intention was to rise the troops morale, and i think that after the video with osama saying that he planed the whole thing many people that knew that lakguage said that he wasnt sayng that!
Individual preference? How about "I don't have a reference so I made some dumb shit up?" If he has a reference, why doesn't he cite it? Um, because he doesn't HAVE one. I know much more about civil and military aviation than any of the teenagers on this site. Thanks anyway.
Vodun is right. If you're gonna quote statistics, cite your source, or else your information is gonna be questionable. Sure its a matter of personal preference, but if you don't cite your source, than anyone looking at your info doesn't have to take it as fact.
Not Done! Aka sin miedo.
Sure, it's pretty simple. If I make a statement that involves facts and figures, it's entirely up to me provide the source. I don't HAVE to do anything here, this is a forum, not my college assignment. It doesn't have to be spick and span MLA/APA format, Times New Roman, 12 pt. In the event that I do not disclose a source, well, it only serves to discredit or devalue my opinions. It won't affect you or the weakness or strengths of your arguments, so, why are you so hung up on this, Vodun?
By the way:
"I know much more about civil and military aviation than any of the teenagers on this site"
So, buddy, what's YOUR source?
The prolonged barrage engulfed Zero-One in the glow of a thousand suns. But unlike their former masters with their delicate flesh, the machines had little to fear of the bombs' radiation and heat. Thus did Zero-One's troops advance outwards in every direction. And one after another, mankind surrendered its territories. So the leaders of men conceived of their most desperate strategy yet. A final solution: the destruction of the sky.
-- The 2nd Renaissance (Part2), Animatrix
NO its all lie Osama dint planed the 11-6 since he is the real USA president!
hehehehehehehe
ups.................
Not hung up - just pointing out that you had the opportunity, with your argument, to provide actual evidence. Not an opinion or theory, but actual black and white print. You chose not to, I suspect, because you don't have the reference. But I'm not losing sleep. I was just interested because I'm in the aviation field, and thought I might learn something. Bad on me for coming here to learn, though. Your source?Quote: from suffianr on 3:53 pm on Aug. 28, 2002
Sure, it's pretty simple. If I make a statement that involves facts and figures, it's entirely up to me provide the source. I don't HAVE to do anything here, this is a forum, not my college assignment. It doesn't have to be spick and span MLA/APA format, Times New Roman, 12 pt. In the event that I do not disclose a source, well, it only serves to discredit or devalue my opinions. It won't affect you or the weakness or strengths of your arguments, so, why are you so hung up on this, Vodun?
By the way:
"I know much more about civil and military aviation than any of the teenagers on this site"
So, buddy, what's YOUR source?
what's your source on this?....
Its really more of grey and white....
-insert witty phrase in between two equals sign here-
