Results 1 to 20 of 48
How close do you think this coming election will be?
The libertarian party has my vote.But then again maybe GW cause he has a backbone although I dont agree with everything he does he still has morals,common knowledge,and he sticks to what he says.
Flip Flop Kerry is a rich turd who does anything to get a vote.
That and since Bush has been in office "The Man" has not come for my guns.hence no new gun laws.
Sept the AWB will expire and I can put the bayonet back on the AK along with my folding stock.
So how close do you think this election will be?
Hitler always kept his word. He had a backbone, you need to be gutsy to try and take over the world and kill 6 million people while you're at it.
Just because someone stands up for what they believe in doesn't mean that belief is worth supporting.
And why the hell do you need a Kalashnikov? Seriously, why? And a bayonet? What are you going to use that for aside from killing people?
"From each, according to his ability. To each, according to his need." -Karl Marx
Marxists Internet Archive
Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.46
miserable failure
I have it to protect me and mine.And also because people like you question why I have one.It kind of makes me nervous.If you catch my drift ole brady.
Why would that make you want to own something that can fire 10 rounds a second?
"From each, according to his ability. To each, according to his need." -Karl Marx
Marxists Internet Archive
Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.46
miserable failure
Well sit down for a sec and let me explain.
Man has a right to defend him/her/it's self from all sorts of threats.And well why settle for anything less.
A armed society is a polite one.
It just freaks me out that someone tells me what I can have as a firearm.
Ohh yea what seperates a free working man from a slave?A free working man has the chance to own firearms.
Molan Labe.
Hmm. I see what you mean. But still, I'd ban private gun ownership if it were possible.
As for the free man/slave thing, no, I believe free will and self determination characterise a free man more than ownership of copious amounts of fire arms.
"From each, according to his ability. To each, according to his need." -Karl Marx
Marxists Internet Archive
Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.46
miserable failure
Typical Bush is Hitler, you guys just don't seem to get it. Its this kind of crazy rhetoric that hurts your cause.
He needs it to fend of crazed communists after the revolution
free·dom:
Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action
Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
Indeed.Originally posted by Crusader 4 da truth@Jul 22 2004, 02:30 PM
Its not even that. Cubanfox just pointed out that robberbaron was praising GW for having certain values, which is fine, really. However, he then pointed out that maybe these values/traits aren't positive.
Believe me, I'm as tired of Bu$h = as you are.
Edit: What I was originally going to say was this:
Bush is only slightly less rich and I have no doubt that he and Kerry would go to similar lenghts to get a vote. Believe me, if you see any difference between Bush and Kerry, you should get yours eyes checked to say the least.
"Turn Changchun into a city of death" -PLA Field Marshall Lin Biao, May 30, 1948
"When we heard outside the city that so many people had died of hunger, we weren't too shocked. We had been in and out of piles of corpses and our hearts had hardened... But when we entered the city and saw what it was like, we were devastated. Many of us wept. A lot of us said: We're supposed to be fighting for the poor, but of all the dead here, how many are the rich? Which of them are Nationalists? Aren't they all poor people?"
-PLA veteran, at the siege of Changchun, 1948
Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Chairman!
No one said that Bush is Hitler. What was being said was that having certain traits doesn't necessarily make you a good person. It's fairly simple logic: Person A is proposed to be good because he has trait X. Person B, who is historically known to be a complete bastard, also had trait X. Thus, having trait X isn't necessarily conducive to being a decent person.Originally posted by Crusader 4 da truth@Jul 22 2004, 07:30 AM
That type of analogy is completely valid.
"to become a philosopher, start by walking very slowly"
A "free working man" sells himself by the hour.
You tell Moses to make bricks without straw,
Now he tells you to make cities without bricks!
AK's are OK, they are quite sturdy, they'll discharge while wet, sandy, and with 1/4 of their parts missing.
However, with a little aded TLC, I think a modern AR-15/M-16 is a better shooting weapon. better muzzle velocity, more rounds per minute, and more precise, especially at longer range. They also have the attachable grenade launcher.
That's a socialist gun you're talking about there. Are you sure you wouldn't like to retract the statement?
Adiel: How can you defend a country where 5 percent of the people control 95 percent of the wealth?
Lisa: I'm defending a country where people can think and act and worship any way they want!
Adiel: Cannot!
Lisa: Can to!
Adiel: Cannot!
Lisa: Can to!
Homer: Please, please, kids; stop fighting. Maybe Lisa is right about America being the land of opportunity, maybe Adiel has a point about the machinery of capitalism being oiled with the blood of the workers.
Hey, lets not kid ourselves, with this comment, much like the debates on this board, I can admit when certain points are good, but my final statement is always that "We're still better!!!Originally posted by DaCuBaN@Jul 24 2004, 01:15 AM
That's a socialist gun you're talking about there. Are you sure you wouldn't like to retract the statement?
There is a grenade launcher attachment for a AK.
I have a norinco MAK-90.And a Bushy m-4 (AR-15)
In Sept I'll be able to have folding/Tele stocks thanks to AWB sunset.
I like the AR but it's like a Porche.You have to baby it.
The AK is like a Old Chevy.Run it and run it fast
AK's also have bigger rounds, capable of penetrating much more than an M-16. I've spoken to many people in the military here and even they admit the AK-47 is much more deadlier than an M-16, although those are more accurate.
"Mankind is divided into rich and poor, into property owners and exploited; and to abstract oneself from this fundamental division; and from the antagonism between poor and rich means abstracting oneself from fundamental facts." - Josef Stalin
"A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery." - Mao Tse-tung
"A man who dreads trials and difficulties cannot become a revolutionary. If he is to become a revolutionary with an indomitable fighting spirit, he must be tempered in the arduous struggle from his youth. As the saying goes, early training means more than late earning." - Kim Jong Il
<span style=\'color:red\'>Marxism-Leninism Today--Northstar Compass--Granma International--KCNA of the DPRK</span>
Why would any of you carry a gun?Here in America we don't have gun crazy fiends running all over the place.Do you all live in such bad towns?
Socialism for a better future.
people in the USA riot over Basketball games.Imagine if they were hungry.
Not if you are arguing by non-essentials.
I wasn't aware guns had any political affilation.Originally posted by DaCuBaN@Jul 24 2004, 01:15 AM
That's a socialist gun you're talking about there. Are you sure you wouldn't like to retract the statement?
