Thread: FNC Not allowed in Canada?

Results 1 to 20 of 109

  1. #1
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Posts 122
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    This is great. I was watching the Fox News Channel last night and they did a report on there inability to get permission to broadcast in Canada. The real kicker is that Al Jazeera just got approval to broadcast. They had some pathetic news reporter that was trying to make Al Jazeera out as a good news source.
  2. #2
    Join Date Dec 2002
    Location New York, USA
    Posts 95
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    This answers my question from a couple of months ago

    They fear an alternative source of news, fortunatly there is nothing they can do about the Matt Drudge and internet bloggs... YET.
    free·dom:
    Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
    1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
  3. #3
    Join Date May 2002
    Posts 3,747
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    More taxes, less freedom, a commie paradise.

    Funny, I've seen Canadian news in the US.

    I guess they favor only state-sponsored and censored trash like al-jazzera.

    And you think Ameircan media is bad?
  4. #4
    Join Date Dec 2002
    Location New York, USA
    Posts 95
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial@Jul 21 2004, 02:00 PM
    More taxes, less freedom, a commie paradise.

    Funny, I've seen Canadian news in the US.

    I guess they favor only state-sponsored and censored trash like al-jazzera.

    And you think Ameircan media is bad?
    I used to live in buffalo we get Canadian news there, its bad but I think the BBC is worse.
    free·dom:
    Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
    1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
  5. #5
    Join Date Mar 2004
    Location Copenhagen
    Posts 1,907
    Organisation
    Socialistisk Standpunkt, IMT
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Maybe the canadians just don't want fairytales to be called news?
    That's all fox provides, fairytales.
    In Defence Of Marxism

    Hands Off Venezuela

    An idiot can ask so many questions it will take years to reply. So if I don't reply to your posts it's probably why
  6. #6
    Join Date Dec 2002
    Location New York, USA
    Posts 95
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Teis@Jul 21 2004, 02:05 PM
    Maybe the canadians just don't want fairytales to be called news?
    That's all fox provides, fairytales.
    If thats true why doesn't the govt trust the people to see that?

    What else will have to be censored in your utopia?
    free·dom:
    Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
    1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
  7. #7
    Join Date May 2002
    Posts 3,747
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Teis@Jul 21 2004, 07:05 PM
    Maybe the canadians just don't want fairytales to be called news?
    That's all fox provides, fairytales.
    But they should allow for freedom of information.

    Isn't it the people that should decide?
  8. #8
    Join Date May 2002
    Posts 3,747
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Its simply censorship, and commies support that.
  9. #9
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Posts 122
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Teis@Jul 21 2004, 07:05 PM
    Maybe the canadians just don't want fairytales to be called news?
    That's all fox provides, fairytales.


    I know this is way to much for your commie mind to absorb but I'll try anyway.

    Ratings should decide if the 'canadians' would like to have FNC. Not the government.

    Only fairytales I see around here are you and your pink friends. Do me a favor, drop some fairy dust on yourself, and disappear.
  10. #10
    Guest1
    Guest

    Default

    Actually dude, they had public hearings on it and none of the people who came to the public discussions wanted to give them the license. As for sattelites, we have sattelites, but they have to be provided by canadian companies so that you get the local news.

    Believe it or not, the airwaves are not private property, not even in the US. They are publicly owned and are leased to the corporations. In this case, Canadians didn't want to waste that limited space on an American news network that broadcasts nothing but bullshit.

    It was not the government that decided this.
  11. #11
    Join Date Jan 2004
    Location Canadia, eh
    Posts 944
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    To demonstrate a point: My father voted Conservative in the recent Canadian elections and even he thinks that CNN is reactionary. The thing is, America is so fucked up that CNN is actually considered liberal. Fox news is just ultra-conservative bullshit nonsense and no one really wants to see it.

    The reason people actually want Al-Jazeera is because they already know that American news is bullshit, they want to see the other side. Personnally, I've never watched Al-Jazeera directly, and I'm willing to bet that niether gummo nor CI have either. So basically, all we have to go on here is other people's descriptions.
    "Turn Changchun into a city of death" -PLA Field Marshall Lin Biao, May 30, 1948

    "When we heard outside the city that so many people had died of hunger, we weren't too shocked. We had been in and out of piles of corpses and our hearts had hardened... But when we entered the city and saw what it was like, we were devastated. Many of us wept. A lot of us said: We're supposed to be fighting for the poor, but of all the dead here, how many are the rich? Which of them are Nationalists? Aren't they all poor people?"

    -PLA veteran, at the siege of Changchun, 1948
    Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Chairman!
  12. #12
    Guest1
    Guest

    Default

    Al-Jazeers is propaganda, no news source has no bias. I've watched it, I am an arab afterall, and it's the best Arabic news source out there. Why? Because it challenges the Arab governments in the middle east, it's the first non-government news channel there.

    They've raised a hell-storm, interviewing democracy activists across the middle east and giving them a platform. They have panels where representatives from one royal family or another are head to head with a wanted opposition leader sitting accross the table. They've had situations where the government official picks up his shit and flings it across the table and is kicked out half-way through the show.

    It's crazy. I love it. But of course there is a bias, everyone has a bias. But I think they provide a poretty balanced view mostly.
  13. #13
    Join Date Jan 2004
    Location Alberta, Canada
    Posts 742
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Any Canadians I know are VERY HAPPY that Fox isn't seen here!
    Redstar2000

    Free People's Movement



    The kids may go hungry...but the village priest always eats well- Redstar2000
  14. #14
    Secular-Distributist/Humanist Committed User
    Join Date Feb 2002
    Posts 3,643
    Rep Power 20

    Default

    I want to see Al Jezeera here, but I can't. Shit I"m sick of Fox News, it is blatantly Conservative, and while they deserve to present their side, it think it's also high time Americans saw it from another point of view.

    If anything CNN is the most Fair and Balanced network....I rarely see editorializing on that station. It is by no means to the left of Center.

    Also I saw O'Rielly's segment. All he was doing was plugging his damn network. Talking about Canada moved to the left, or maybe America just moved to the right. Hell even the guest who agreed with him admitted america moved to the right.

    If the candadian people want it badly enough then they'll get it.
    "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why they are poor, they call me a communist." -- Hélder Pessoa Câmara
  15. #15
    Join Date Dec 2002
    Location New York, USA
    Posts 95
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Che y Marijuana@Jul 21 2004, 05:32 PM
    Actually dude, they had public hearings on it and none of the people who came to the public discussions wanted to give them the license. As for sattelites, we have sattelites, but they have to be provided by canadian companies so that you get the local news.

    Believe it or not, the airwaves are not private property, not even in the US. They are publicly owned and are leased to the corporations. In this case, Canadians didn't want to waste that limited space on an American news network that broadcasts nothing but bullshit.

    It was not the government that decided this.
    Great I’m glad your govt finally decided to allow you guys access to Satellite Dishes, but its unfortunate that they've decide not to let you choose your service provider.

    Your point about the Airwaves is true, standard broadcasters are leasing the airwaves and thus must meet certain standards imposed by respective governments, I'm against this and would abolish the FCC here in America.

    But those standards do not apply to cable or satellite, Space in not an issue as an almost unlimited number of programming can be viewed with a dish, The Canadian govt. has imposed its self on its people and censored fox news. That’s wrong, It should be available to those who want to view it. Che y Marijuana what if some govt censored che-lives.com? If you believe in free speech then it has to be across the board not just speech you agree with.
    free·dom:
    Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
    1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
  16. #16
    Join Date May 2002
    Posts 3,747
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by sexydj4u@Jul 22 2004, 12:45 AM
    Any Canadians I know are VERY HAPPY that Fox isn't seen here!
    Canadians you know is not every Canadian. Not even close. The O'reilly factor gets positive e-mails from Canada and Canadians often.

    Besides, what can I say? Canadians are happy with a 50%+ tax rate and censorship. More power to you.

    (Actually, I'm sorry, I guess the correct term would be "less power to you".)
  17. #17
    Join Date Dec 2002
    Location New York, USA
    Posts 95
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Capitalist Imperial
    Canadians you know is not every Canadian. Not even close. The O'reilly factor gets positive e-mails from Canada and Canadians often.
    Didn't you read the post CI the Canadian Govt decided all the Canadian people hate fox news, so it must be censored. Makes sense to me, VIVA LA REVULSION!
    free·dom:
    Pronunciation: 'frE-dom
    1 : the absence of coercion, or constraint in choice or action

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito
  18. #18
    Join Date Mar 2004
    Location Copenhagen
    Posts 1,907
    Organisation
    Socialistisk Standpunkt, IMT
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    Didn't you read the post CI the Canadian Govt decided all the Canadian people hate fox news, so it must be censored. Makes sense to me, VIVA LA REVULSION!
    I see you can't read. Not surprisingly if Fox is your source of information. What happened was they had public hearings. If anybody wanted FOX they could have gone there. Nobody wanted it. That's a thing called democracy in action. You guys are just called pathetic for going on with a case that has no basis.

    Great I’m glad your govt finally decided to allow you guys access to Satellite Dishes
    Are you plain stupid? Or do you actually think Canada just got sattelittes?
    In Defence Of Marxism

    Hands Off Venezuela

    An idiot can ask so many questions it will take years to reply. So if I don't reply to your posts it's probably why
  19. #19
    Join Date Jun 2004
    Posts 122
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Originally posted by Teis@Jul 22 2004, 03:41 PM

    I see you can't read. Not surprisingly if Fox is your source of information. What happened was they had public hearings. If anybody wanted FOX they could have gone there. Nobody wanted it. That's a thing called democracy in action. You guys are just called pathetic for going on with a case that has no basis.



    Are you plain stupid? Or do you actually think Canada just got sattelittes?
    I guess the people that wanted it had better things to do than to drive to city hall when they heard the town cryer. Why should they need 'public hearings'? If it's true that people didn't show up for the councel meeting on fox but did for Al Jazeera then it's canada that is pathetic.
  20. #20
    Join Date Mar 2004
    Location Copenhagen
    Posts 1,907
    Organisation
    Socialistisk Standpunkt, IMT
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    guess the people that wanted it had better things to do than to drive to city hall when they heard the town cryer. Why should they need 'public hearings'? If it's true that people didn't show up for the councel meeting on fox but did for Al Jazeera then it's canada that is pathetic.
    So what you are saying is that the people who want FOX is 1. to lazy to make an effort to get their station 2. don't really care since they got enough soaps anyway. I had a suspicion that those were the kind of people who viewed FOX
    In Defence Of Marxism

    Hands Off Venezuela

    An idiot can ask so many questions it will take years to reply. So if I don't reply to your posts it's probably why

Similar Threads

  1. Nukes allowed??
    By Rastaman in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 3rd January 2004, 00:26
  2. Che Not Allowed
    By libertino in forum Ernesto "Che" Guevara
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 28th October 2003, 20:18
  3. Why Canada is the BEST country in the World - O Canada!!
    By Nobody in forum Opposing Ideologies
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 16th June 2003, 15:52

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread