Thread: Ckaihatsu abuses of admin power, spamming, generally rude behavior

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,893
    The lol people
    Rep Power 51

    Default Ckaihatsu abuses of admin power, spamming, generally rude behavior

    ckaihatsu is announcing his intent to abuse his admin privileges here:

    Guess you really like closed threads and personal infractions levied. Maybe *this* time it'll all happen so quickly that Rafiq won't be able to keep up to save your broke-down ass.
    Furthermore his history of abusing admin powers is documented well across multiple threads in the technical support forum, but just for anyone who isn't up to date:

    Here are links to some other ckaihatsu related gems:

    Summary: Chris has a long history of violating the rules, including posting personal information (both pictures and his actual name), spamming the forum, bullying users, and utilizing his admin powers to try and silence users who speak out against his behavior. He also has a history of giving quack medical advice that will do nothing to actually improve people's health- when asked to prove that his gimmicks do work, he'll just act like you've not done any research or claim that because he thinks it worked for him that it must work for everyone. Then there are threads that he posts which go against literally everything that peer reviewed scientific studies have proven, and instead he cites fringe websites that make a lot of (clearly false) claims and acts as if that's proof- if he cites a source at all.

    Also, one comment he posted in this thread says the following:
    You're being impersonal, vague, and probably sectarian. Just make your own point(s) for whatever post(s) on *this* discussion board -- it's a matter of good etiquette.
    Which is laughable because he constantly is claiming he doesn't need to add any of his own content to his posts- which can be seen by what he posted in the ckaihatsu spamming thread(s). Here are a couple such examples:
    News, and the analysis / discussion *of* news are two different things -- I don't see myself as a 'discussion facilitator' here, but rather as someone who can provide *many* revolutionary-relevant *topics* (news items) that everyone else can choose from, or not.
    I don't agree here, though -- I'm not looking to be a 'commentator', nor would I want that as a requirement.
    There are several more, but this was just the first couple I ran across. He's saying for regular users we have to post our own content, but he doesn't because he doesn't want to.

    He is clearly unfit for an admin position.
    Last edited by BIXX; 10th November 2017 at 21:28.
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to BIXX For This Useful Post:

  3. #2
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,289
    Rep Power 65


    As usual, BIXX, you and your faction were warned to discontinue this kind of ad hominem antagonism.

    You're simply projecting the contents of *your own* behavior on this board, onto *me*, and it's not welcome.

    Thread closed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts