Ckaihatsu abuses of admin power, spamming, generally rude behavior
ckaihatsu is announcing his intent to abuse his admin privileges here: https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...03#post2889503
Guess you really like closed threads and personal infractions levied. Maybe *this* time it'll all happen so quickly that Rafiq won't be able to keep up to save your broke-down ass.
Furthermore his history of abusing admin powers is documented well across multiple threads in the technical support forum, but just for anyone who isn't up to date:
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...hatsu-spamming
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...pamming-thread
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...su-Spamming-II
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...pamming-thread
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...losing-threads
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...reatening-bans
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...losing-threads
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...nd-to-a-thread
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...er-as-an-admin
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...help-right-now
Here are links to some other ckaihatsu related gems:
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...uantum+pendant
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...erials-at-home
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...gineered-sound
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...fined-sea-salt
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...ory-of-Gravity
https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...-at-a-distance
Summary: Chris has a long history of violating the rules, including posting personal information (both pictures and his actual name), spamming the forum, bullying users, and utilizing his admin powers to try and silence users who speak out against his behavior. He also has a history of giving quack medical advice that will do nothing to actually improve people's health- when asked to prove that his gimmicks do work, he'll just act like you've not done any research or claim that because he thinks it worked for him that it must work for everyone. Then there are threads that he posts which go against literally everything that peer reviewed scientific studies have proven, and instead he cites fringe websites that make a lot of (clearly false) claims and acts as if that's proof- if he cites a source at all.
Also, one comment he posted in this thread says the following:
You're being impersonal, vague, and probably sectarian. Just make your own point(s) for whatever post(s) on *this* discussion board -- it's a matter of good etiquette.
Which is laughable because he constantly is claiming he doesn't need to add any of his own content to his posts- which can be seen by what he posted in the ckaihatsu spamming thread(s). Here are a couple such examples:
News, and the analysis / discussion *of* news are two different things -- I don't see myself as a 'discussion facilitator' here, but rather as someone who can provide *many* revolutionary-relevant *topics* (news items) that everyone else can choose from, or not.
I don't agree here, though -- I'm not looking to be a 'commentator', nor would I want that as a requirement.
There are several more, but this was just the first couple I ran across. He's saying for regular users we have to post our own content, but he doesn't because he doesn't want to.
He is clearly unfit for an admin position.
Last edited by BIXX; 10th November 2017 at 21:28.
"I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
