Thread: Urgent, Ckaihatsu is infracting userrs, closing threads, threatening bans

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location The Upside Down
    Posts 11,468
    Rep Power 195

    Default Urgent, Ckaihatsu is infracting userrs, closing threads, threatening bans

    This is an issue of technical support, because an administrator on this forum has gone completely off the rails after being denied the ability to spam. That's the actual situation.

    Ckaihatsu, you are not allowed to close threads you are involved in, especially not threads where users are posting about your abuses of the forum or them. You are also not allowed to infract users for creating a place to post about your abuse of the forum or them, after you have removed the first place to do that.

    As was decided, what you were doing was in fact spam, that's why you're not allowed to do it anymore. It is entirely because of users coming forward and showing how the spam and behavior is disruptive in the ckaihatsu spamming thread that this was articulated. You of all admins don't get to close those threads, and you certainly don't get to issue infractions.
    Last edited by Ele'ill; 11th October 2017 at 18:36.
    "whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"

    http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ele'ill For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,832
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    Originally Posted by ckaihatsu
    This isn't a 'technical support issue' -- it's an *internal-political* one.
    No, it's a technical support issue because I can't respond to a thread that I should be able to.

    Originally Posted by ckaihatsu
    I'm not 'sanctioning' ('approving') your groupthink-ideology -- I'm allowing one thread about your spamming, and you're off-topic on it.
    This is an example of someone trying to rewrite history folks.

    Originally Posted by ckaihatsu
    Thread closed.
    It's always a real shocker when a reflect admin abuses their power. /s
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  4. #3
    Join Date Aug 2008
    Posts 3,091
    Organisation
    The Socialist Party of Great Britain
    Rep Power 37

    Default

    Please tell me this unapologetic and recividist spammer is banned or at least no longer a mod.
  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Idler For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date Jan 2005
    Location The Upside Down
    Posts 11,468
    Rep Power 195

    Default

    Ckaihatsu is still an admin and tbh some other admin/mod needs to step up because there's still infractions out and threads closed
    "whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"

    http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
  7. #5
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,888
    Rep Power 62

    Default


    This is an issue of technical support, because an administrator on this forum has gone completely off the rails after being denied the ability to spam. That's the actual situation.

    No, it *isn't* the actual situation, because I've been cooperative with changes in board policy as they've happened.

    You're *misconstruing*, as usual, and attempting to define the working definition of 'spam' for the board.



    Ckaihatsu, you are not allowed to close threads you are involved in, especially not threads where users are posting about your abuses of the forum or them.

    This is not my understanding. My understanding is that an admin is not allowed to *issue infractions* for 'flaming' that is directed at them. Your petty groupthink faction already has a thread available to all of you:


    Spamming of several threads by the 'spam-defining' faction

    https://www.revleft.space/vb/threads...fining-faction



    You are also not allowed to infract users for creating a place to post about your abuse of the forum or them, after you have removed the first place to do that.

    I have not issued any warnings or infractions to *anyone* around anything of this kind that you're describing -- I *have* issued infractions to you and BIXX for attempting to circumvent my closing of threads.



    As was decided, what you were doing was in fact spam, that's why you're not allowed to do it anymore. It is entirely because of users coming forward and showing how the spam and behavior is disruptive in the ckaihatsu spamming thread that this was articulated. You of all admins don't get to close those threads, and you certainly don't get to issue infractions.

    You certainly don't get to change board policy on the basis of just your say-so.



    No, it's a technical support issue because I can't respond to a thread that I should be able to.

    The board software isn't malfunctioning and arbitrarily closing threads itself, so it's an internal-political issue.


    ---



    I'm not 'sanctioning' ('approving') your groupthink-ideology -- I'm allowing one thread about your spamming, and you're off-topic on it.


    This is an example of someone trying to rewrite history folks.

    No, because this isn't 'history' yet -- it's 'active' because you and your faction are stubbornly aiming to revise board policy on the mere basis of your say-so, such as for the defining of 'spam'.



    It's always a real shocker when a reflect admin abuses their power.

    All you do is issue-forth your *opinions*, and fabricate the narrative underlying your efforts, like exaggerating the general support that (doesn't) exist for your faction's internal-political agenda.


    Thread closed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Website Security Test