A convenient liberal distraction and one big bourgeois reaction, but an actual fascist Trump is not.
He is a nuttier than squirrel shit racist, though.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
A convenient liberal distraction and one big bourgeois reaction, but an actual fascist Trump is not.
He is a nuttier than squirrel shit racist, though.
Chomsky defended the protestors. I mean the Nazis, not the antifascists. He claimed they were well within their rights to march there.
The state shouldn't be granted the power to restrict so much as a single mouse fart.
So yes, they were within their rights. 100%. And Antifa, too, were well within their rights...to kick their Nazi asses.
This is a good example of the *limits* of bourgeois 'rights'.
If we're stuck in a nationalistic framework then all politics, including revolutionary politics, has to pass through the bourgeois filter of 'who-has-rights-and-who-doesn't', when such is *meaningless* in confronting the far-right. (If they didn't get protection from the state they'd be popularly *overwhelmed* in no-time flat.)
Chomsky simply reiterated his stance that he's always had.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/no...rticle/2631786
Most of you will vehemently disagree with me on this but I feel sorry for those deluded boys. Not as much as for Heather or her mom, but yes, in any just society they would be rounded up en masse and sent to the mental hospital.
They deserve to have their little asses whooped, but I am anti-retribution in all aspects of society. Violence is only okay on the street to defend those being attacked. After that it's NOT okay, particularly when one group can't defend themselves.
My hope is that when the stuff dies down...and will eventually...those young men learn a valuable lesson.
Last edited by GLF; 20th August 2017 at 14:37.