Thread: Act Now to Protect Colombian Trade Unionists!

Results 1 to 9 of 9

  1. #1
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,886
    Rep Power 62

    Default Act Now to Protect Colombian Trade Unionists!

    Act Now to Protect Colombian Trade Unionists!

    If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online


    TAKE ACTION




    Dear Chris,

    Last month, Alberto Román Acosta González, president of the Guacarí branch of Colombia’s National Union of Agricultural Workers (SINTRAINAGRO), was gunned down by two hired men while watching his son play soccer. For over ten years, Alberto fought for the rights of sugarcane cutters who toil in the fields for up to 14 hours a day and make as little as $200 dollars a month.

    Call for justice for Alberto by urging the Colombian government to fully investigate the murder and protect Colombian trade union leaders!

    This latest attack is a stark reminder for SINTRAINAGRO – a union that represents 35,000 workers engaged in the production of bananas, sugar cane, palm oil, rice and flowers. Amidst the five decades of armed conflict in Colombia, SINTRAINAGRO has seen some 1,300 of its members murdered in this context, mainly by right-wing paramilitary groups protecting powerful political and business interests.

    Despite the historic peace deal signed last November that formally ended the 50 year-long civil war between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, violence against human rights defenders has escalated. According to the United Nations, at least 41 Colombian social movement leaders were killed during the first four months of 2017.

    SINTRAINAGRO has asked for international support for their demand that the President of Colombia, Juan Manuel Santos, and his government undertake a full and transparent investigation into the assassination of Alberto Román Acosta González and implement appropriate measures to protect union leaders and members. International pressure is critical to ensuring the safety of trade unionists and workers’ rights activists.

    Send an email directly to President Santos and his administration calling on them to take action!

    In solidarity,

    Gabriela Rosazza
    Stephen Coats Memorial Fellow
    U.S. Labor Education in the Americas Project (USLEAP)



    This email was sent by the International Labor Rights Forum.
    Donate | Subscribe | Contact us

    Follow us:
    Facebook Twitter

    To unsubscribe from future mailings please click here.
  2. #2
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,829
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    Is this sort of thing applicable in all areas of working class struggle? I'm thinking here about asking president Trump to issue a pardon to every j20 political prisoner and whether that would be an effective revolutionary strategy to free our comrades.

    Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to BIXX For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,886
    Rep Power 62

    Default


    Is this sort of thing applicable in all areas of working class struggle? I'm thinking here about asking president Trump to issue a pardon to every j20 political prisoner and whether that would be an effective revolutionary strategy to free our comrades.

    Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk

    I see petition-signing as being comparable to entryism -- both are decent ways of arriving at an estimation of quantitative support, whether through bourgeois elections or the signing of petitions for specific issues.

    But, yeah, they're only a first-step, at best.
  5. #4
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,829
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    What's the point of the estimation of quantitative support if you have to water down your wording and program (if you have a program) so that liberals or the reformist left will sign your petition? Is that strictly revolutionary?
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  6. #5
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,886
    Rep Power 62

    Default


    What's the point of the estimation of quantitative support if you have to water down your wording and program (if you have a program) so that liberals or the reformist left will sign your petition? Is that strictly revolutionary?

    You're implying that the politics of this petition is watered-down -- but isn't it politically appropriate for revolutionaries to support trade unionists who are under attack, and even killed -- ?
  7. #6
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,829
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    If I am murdered by the state I'd hope that my friends would do a hell of a lot more than write a few letters.
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  8. #7
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 2,829
    Rep Power 49

    Default

    I guess my view of solidarity just don't line up with something you can do from the comfort of your home without actually engaging and attacking the think that destroys those who you are in solidarity with. It doesn't make me feel better to know that people "support" me through hitting a like button or sending out some email that ultimate means nothing.
    "I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
    Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.
  9. #8
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,886
    Rep Power 62

    Default


    If I am murdered by the state I'd hope that my friends would do a hell of a lot more than write a few letters.

    I guess my view of solidarity just don't line up with something you can do from the comfort of your home without actually engaging and attacking the think that destroys those who you are in solidarity with. It doesn't make me feel better to know that people "support" me through hitting a like button or sending out some email that ultimate means nothing.

    Okay, well, it's publicity, and it's better than *not* having it.
  10. #9
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location Ontario
    Posts 603
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Similar developments... Does anybody have a basic recap of the 2016 peace process?

    Massacre in Tumaco - US pushes for more repression

    By James Jordan |

    October 10, 2017

    Read more articles in Colombia

    October 5 massacre in Tumaco, Colombia. (FightBack!News/Staff)


    Fight Back News Service is circulating the following Oct. 9 statement by the Alliance for Global Justice.

    The Colombian National Police massacred between 8 and 16 persons, wounding more than 50, in the municipality of Tumaco, Nariño on Thursday afternoon, October 5, 2017. The attack was directed against protesting coca growing families demanding the government fulfill its commitments to voluntary eradication programs.

    Additionally, on Sunday, October 8, 2017, the National Police attacked an international team sent to investigate the massacre. The police used tear gas and stun grenades to disperse representatives from the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and a journalist from the Colombian weekly, Semana. The National Police and Colombia's military are both under the direction of the Ministry of Defense.

    Initially, the Colombian government claimed that the massacre was the result of an attack by dissident insurgents who oppose accords between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army (FARC-EP). However, eyewitnesses from the community concur that the violence was perpetrated by the police. Since the implementation of the accords, Tumaco has been the site of several assassinations of local leaders and attacks against protesters by the armed forces and paramilitaries.

    Colombian peace accords were implemented as the law of the land in late November 2016. They include provisions for crop substitution and infrastructure development to create a viable alternative to illicit crops. Under the National Comprehensive Program for Illicit Crop Substitution, the Colombian government has signed 105,000 crop substitution pacts with rural families and it is estimated that its goal of crop substitution programs for 50,000 hectares will be reached by the end of the year. The government has also forcibly eradicated another 50,000 hectares during the same period, often in the same areas where it has signed substitution agreements.

    Even when substitution pacts have been signed, they have been beset with delays in payments and infrastructure and road improvements. Some peasant families complain that they must travel through areas of paramilitary activity to access benefits. Another difficulty has been that some communities requesting to participate in the voluntary program have been ignored and subjected to forced eradication.

    The Trump administration is pressuring Colombia to abandon the voluntary program in favor of forced eradication which frequently results in state violence. The White House is also urging Colombia to return to aerial fumigation of illicit crops with Monsanto’s RoundUp Ultra. Vice President Mike Pence, Ambassador to Colombia Kevin Whitaker, and William Brownfield, the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, have all declared that the US will not support voluntary eradication programs because they are the result of accords signed between the Colombian government and the FARC-EP. The fact does not seem to matter that these accords have brought an end to a 52-year civil war that left more than 220,000 persons dead; 92,000 disappeared; and 6 million rural families displaced. Nor does it matter that the FARC-EP no longer exists and former insurgents have disarmed. The new FARC, the Common Alternative Revolutionary Force, is a legal, nonviolent, and civilian political party that is integrated into civil society.

    The White House justifies their position by repeating the myth that the now defunct FARC-EP have been and continue to be major narcotics traffickers. However, both Colombian and US government studies have debunked this assertion. It is generally recognized that the FARC-EP had levied a tax on narco-traffickers, but had not been major producers or merchants of narcotics. A 2001 Colombian government study found right wing paramilitaries to be responsible for more than 40% of the cocaine trade and the FARC-EP for no more than 2.5%.

    Donnie Marshall, the head of the Drug Enforcement Agency under Pres. George W. Bush has gone on record saying, “…there is no evidence that any FARC or ELN units have established international transportation, wholesale distribution or drug money-laundering networks in the United States or Europe.”
    According to Rafael Suarez, who was a military advisor to the Uribe administration, “if you reduce the FARC to just a drug cartel, you make the possibility of negotiating a political settlement more difficult.” Of course, if the goal is not peace, but the consolidation of stolen lands, then the strategy works well of branding the FARC-EP as major drug traffickers and carrying out a “War on Drugs” that is really a War of Displacement and a War against Farmers.

    On the other hand, Colombia’s former president Álvaro Uribe was on a Defense Intelligence Agency list in 1991 as one of Colombia's top narco-traffickers. His administration received billions of dollars in US funding via Plan Colombia.

    William Brownfield first came to the State Department in 1979, under the Carter Administration. He was promoted to his current position as an Assistant Secretary of State under Pres. Barak Obama and continues in the job under the Trump administration. Before that, he had served as Ambassador to Colombia during the Uribe administration, and as Ambassador to Chile and to Venezuela. He has had assignments with the State Department and the Pentagon's Southern Command in El Salvador, Argentina, Panama, and Honduras. He is accused of helping cover up an incident in which four Honduran community members, including two pregnant women, were killed with shots fired from a State Department helicopter in 2012. He has announced his imminent retirement.

    But given his long background as a promotor of the US Empire, his pronouncements against voluntary eradication programs in Colombia are chilling. On August 2, 2017, Brownfield reported that, "The United States is not currently supporting the Colombian government's voluntary eradication and crop substitution program because the FARC is involved.... In 2016, 675 attempted eradication operations were cancelled in the field due to restrictive rules of engagement that prevented security forces from engaging protestors."

    We of the Alliance for Global Justice are intimately familiar with circumstances facing rural Colombian families who are forced to cultivate illicit crops such as coca, marijuana, and poppies. We have a close relationship with FENSUAGRO, Colombia's federation of agricultural workers and peasant farmers unions. We have traveled extensively with FENSUAGRO on barely passable roads to villages where families are trying to raise and sell legal crops, especially in coffee growing areas. They do so against incredible odds. We have traveled roads that have required us to stop every 15 to 20 minutes to make repairs just so we could keep going. We have trampled in the rainy season to villages like Maracaibo, Tolima, where we were laboring through paths so muddy that we were covered up to and past our knees. We have seen again and again rural villages that lack schools and teachers (or that have schools with virtually no supplies), health services, electricity, or any viable way to get crops to markets. In such cases, families turn to the cultivation of illicit crops because narcotraffickers are the only economic interests who will travel to these villages to make purchases.


    For the United States government to demand forced eradication over voluntary programs constitutes nothing less than a cynical call for bloody repression of Colombian farming families. The Trump administration does not want peace in Colombia. It wants more death and displacement so that access to natural resources is cleared for transnational corporations. It wants Colombia to exist first and foremost as an outpost of Empire and a threat to the stability of the entire region. We who love peace and justice want something very different. We know that a Colombia at peace and rooted in justice would be a major step towards peace, justice, and liberation from Empire throughout Latin America and, indeed, the world.


    Source: http://www.fightbacknews.org/2017/10...ore-repression


  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Homo Songun For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. How Nonviolence Protects the State.
    By PhoenixAsh in forum RevLeft Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21st April 2014, 22:34
  2. Foreign Aid in Colombia: A Tool of Domination
    By PRC-UTE in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 21st August 2009, 11:29
  3. The Plough
    By PRC-UTE in forum Upcoming Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st February 2006, 07:11
  4. US Perspectives Part 3 - Election 2004
    By Daymare17 in forum Theory
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th October 2004, 20:22

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Website Security Test