I understand the idea that, due to development of productive forces,capitalism will enter the crisis, and that private property will have tobe replaced with collective property.
However, I do not know why Marx believes that future society will havesome form of egalitarian distribution, like those from Critique of GottaProgramme? It is not logical necessity. One can imagine collectiveproperty and planned economy, yet inegalitarian, discriminatingdistribution. Why egalitarian distribution is historical necessity?
Did Marx or some other Marxist thinker addressed it or what do you think?
Egalitarianism shouldn't factor into historical materialism. In fact, egalitarianism shouldn't be what our efforts are toward anyway.
Egalitarian distribution means that there is an economy, work, and the industries that tie the two together are still part of the post-insurgency existant. If we want total freedom, then we cannot continue with the idea of egalitarian distribution. Instead we must decide upon distribution based around desire, both the desire of those who might produce a product, and those who'd receive it. If I want a candle, but neither I nor anyone else wants to produce a candle for me, too bad. However if my friend or neighbor or some dude across the sea want to make me a candle then I'm in luck.
"I'm not interested in indulging whims from members of your faction."
Seeing as this is seen as acceptable by an admin, from here on out when I have a disagreement with someone I will be asking them to reference this. If you want an explanation of my views, too bad.