Sorry to resurrect an older thread, but this issue's gotten a lot of attention lately with the impending FCC vote on December 14.
Net neutrality has such widespread, impassioned support that it's crucial for the left to take a leading role in the movement to protect it.
A free and open internet is not only crucial to education and organization (and websites like this one), but its something we can honestly say we consistently stand for, while the move to help certain interests profit from an uneven playing field through throttling, etc. is something we're inherently against.
The idea that content producers should not be allowed to pay their way to greater access to web-surfers through preferential treatment by ISPs is consistent with socialist logic: let the people put it out there, and let the people decide what to browse, or not, without being systematically driven by mechanisms designed to privilege a few.
There will be protests at Verizon stores across the U.S. on December 7 (FCC Chairman Ajit Pai formerly worked on Verizon's legal team), and plenty of other actions, I'm sure.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994