Thread: Three dead as millions demonstrate across Venezuela

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default Three dead as millions demonstrate across Venezuela

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../vene-a21.html


    Three dead as millions demonstrate across Venezuela

    By Eric London

    21 April 2017

    Millions of supporters and detractors of the Venezuelan government led by President Nicolas Maduro are demonstrating across Venezuela, bringing tensions to their highest point since 2015. On Wednesday, clashes between the two groups left three dead, including two opposition protesters and one soldier.

    The opposition demonstration Wednesday, billed as the “mother of all marches,” was a right-wing show of force aimed at appealing to the Venezuelan military, factions of the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela, and US imperialism to secure more favorable bargaining terms with the government. The PSUV, which also held a sizable rally of its own on Wednesday, has been in power since the election of ex-president Hugo Chavez in 1998. Maduro became president in 2013 after Chavez’s death.

    In a move intended to provoke a government crackdown, opposition leaders directed Wednesday’s massive crowd over an elevated highway situated above a river and led them toward government buildings in the city center. Opposition leader Henrique Capriles then used the resulting clashes as a pretext to call for continued demonstrations Thursday.

    The demonstrations took place with Caracas under martial law. On Tuesday, Maduro enacted “Plan Zamora,” a domestic military operation that involved placing Caracas’s highways, public buildings, and key television antennas under military control. General Jose Ornelas, military commander of the capital region, explained: “We must defend Caracas.” In addition, local police across the country have been placed under the authority of the National Guard.

    The extent of the military presence reflects the nervousness within government circles that increasing divisions are emerging in the government. Three weeks ago, the Venezuelan Supreme Court stripped the legislature of its lawmaking powers in a move that was later reversed after being opposed by Maduro’s own attorney general, Luisa Ortega Diaz. In a statement released Wednesday, Ortega abstained from repeating Maduro’s claim that demonstrators are “terrorists” and instead appealed to both opposition leaders and the military to refrain from violence.

    On Tuesday, the government announced the arrest of four junior army officers—three first lieutenants and a captain—for “conspiracy and planning terrorist actions.” Speaking Tuesday, Maduro said the officers “are playing with the most sacred thing the Republic has, which is national unity, civil-military unity, and peace.”

    The arrests were a shot across the bow to silence opposition in the armed forces, which have provided the PSUV with a key base of support over the last two decades. Elements within the army’s senior command have greatly enriched themselves since Chavez—a former military officer—took power in 1998. On Monday, Maduro appeared at a rally of thousands of soldiers and officers, praising them for “repudiating sedition against the country and traitors of the country.” Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez pledged the armed forces’ “unconditional” loyalty to Maduro.

    Aware of growing divisions and hoping to work out a deal on behalf of American oil companies, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Wednesday that the Venezuelan government is “not allowing the opposition to have their voices heard” and is “violating its own constitution.”

    The Trump administration has signaled a policy of more-active involvement in Venezuela. In February, Trump launched a new round of sanctions against Venezuelan Vice President Tareck El Aissami and met personally with the wife of ultra-right-wing opposition leader Leopold Lopez. These moves come despite the Maduro government’s US$500,000 gift, funneled through Citgo, the US subsidiary of the Venezuelan state oil company, to fund Trump’s inauguration festivities, according to U.S. Federal Elections Commission filings released Wednesday.

    Washington’s record of military interventions and support for Latin American dictators and death squads shows that Tillerson’s statements about defending “free speech” in Venezuela are beyond hypocritical. Before joining the White House, Tillerson was CEO of ExxonMobil, which has been exploiting Venezuela’s oil since 1921. Chavez nationalized ExxonMobil’s extraction facilities in 2007, and the company is searching for ways to “tap” Venezuelan oil once again.

    The working class largely abstained from this week’s demonstrations, and there was no uptick in strikes or walkouts.

    The unpopularity of Maduro’s government among the working class is outpaced only by popular hatred for the opposition, which is concentrated among upper-middle-class layers, including students, operating under the direction of groups with close ties to the Central Intelligence Agency and US State Department.

    Groups associated with the US government and US corporations give tens of millions of dollars to the Venezuelan opposition, much in the form of “youth outreach” to recruit members of the right-wing opposition. In 2008, the Cato Institute gave its Milton Friedman Prize for Advancing Liberty and a cash prize of US$500,000 to an opposition student leader. The opposition’s attempts to denounce Maduro’s crackdown on free speech are a fraud. In March, opposition leader Julio Borges called for the military to establish a dictatorship.

    But support for the chavista government has evaporated in the midst of an unprecedented collapse in living standards for the Venezuelan working class.

    The pro-capitalist, nationalist policies of the Chavez-Maduro governments, based almost entirely on oil exports, left the economy vulnerable to the drop in the international price of oil. The government responded by orchestrating a massive transfer of wealth from the working class to the pockets of international finance capital, slashing social programs to make interest payments to its creditors.

    As a result of these policies, 75 percent of the population—some 22 million people—lost an average of 19 pounds of body weight in 2016 alone due to lack of food. A recent university study shows that 93 percent of the country has insufficient income to purchase basic food, while a third of the population eats fewer than three meals per day, nearly triple the figure from 2015.

    Mass hunger and malnutrition gave rise to a series of spontaneous demonstrations in working class neighborhoods in the first half of 2016, in which residents attacked government food storage warehouses and sacked shops where owners were hoarding food. Conditions have only continued to deteriorate.

    Under these conditions, the chavista and opposition factions of the ruling class fear a social explosion. Former Interior Minister Miguel Rodriguez Torres hinted at this in February when he said the government must “open space for participation to dissipate the violence” in order to “pay homage to those who died in ’89.”

    This was a reference to the mass protests of February-March 1989, in which demonstrations in the town of Guarenas near Caracas over a rise in bus fares spread rapidly across the country, igniting a social powder keg. The government of Carlos Andres Perez responded by suspending the constitution, declaring martial law, and massacring more than 1,000 people.

    This event looms large in the memory of both factions of the Venezuelan bourgeoisie. Both the chavistas and the opposition are planning their strategies with the overarching goal of preventing an outbreak of the class struggle.

    Copyright © 1998-2017 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved
  2. #2
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default Guarimbas 2.0– murder and terror brought to you by the Empire and the local oligarchy

    http://www.investigaction.net/en/gua...cal-oligarchy/


    AGENDA

    Guarimbas 2.0 – murder and terror brought to you by the Empire and the local oligarchy

    23 Apr 2017 RICARDO VAZ



    The episodes in recent days, featuring the erection of barricades, destruction of public property and widespread violence by opposition groups bring back memories of the 2014 guarimbas (1). After months of violence, with certain neighbourhoods effectively under siege, and a death toll of 43, the opposition gangs slowly demobilised. But some analysts argue that this time it is different. With the right-wing coming to power in Brazil and Argentina and the permanent hostility of the empire, some international bodies have been neutralised and others, such as the OAS, adopted a plainly interventionist agenda against Venezuela. And as always when it comes to Venezuela, the empire and the local oligarchy make sure that their “war” on the streets is backed by a “war” through the media.


    Capitalising from every death

    On April 13, armed opposition groups entered the Ali Primera housing project (2) in Barquisimeto and shot dead a 13 year-old boy, Brayan Principal. While the boy’s mother and other residents denounced the attack from right-wing terrorists, the Agence France Presse, and all the outlets that followed suit, relied solely on an opposition legislator, Alfonso Marquina, for a description of the ordeal. And he said that

    “armed supporters of the government were responsible for the boy’s death”

    So right-wing terrorists attacked one of the government’s flagship projects, killed a young boy, and the media reported that the government was to blame! A murder victim was turned into a martyr for the murderers’ cause.

    While this kind of manipulation may sound revolting, it is actually common practice. Through manipulation and a tremendously one-sided perspective, the mainstream media has worked tirelessly to fit every death and injury into the “authoritarian government repressing peaceful protesters” narrative.


    Cartoon by Carlos Latuff

    The violent opposition guarimbas of 2014 resulted in 43 dead people. A detailed look at all the victims and the circumstances in which they died shows that a few of them were opposition members, a roughly equal number were law enforcement agents, and the large majority were either government supporters or bystanders. And yet, the western media (and private media in Venezuela as well) will talk about “43 dead as a result of government repression” or “43 dead as a result of clashes with government forces”. If we are very lucky we will read about “43 victims from both sides of the political divide”. But even this is misleading. Hanging a wire across an avenue and beheading a motorcyclist is not any kind of political statement, nor is the victim from this or the other side of the political divide. It is a plain murder.

    The Venezuelan police forces have on occasion been accused of deploying heavy-handed tactics, for instance in the recent OLP (Operación de Liberación del Pueblo) campaign. But the fact is that law enforcement agents have been arrested and seen charges brought against them for negligent or criminal actions that might have resulted in injuries or death to bystanders or protesters, even if these were armed and violent. This happened a few days ago, when a bystander was shot dead by a police officer, just like it happened three years ago. It is a level of accountability that is miles away from the impunity enjoyed in places like the United States, where police officers can shoot an unarmed man in the back or choke someone to death without any real consequences.


    The permanent coup-plotting of the opposition

    It might be a good idea for the Harvard Kennedy School, and other places that educate the children of the Venezuelan oligarchs, to include Machiavelli in their curricula. By reading “Il Principe” they would be aware of the dangers of hiring “mercenaries” to do their dirty work. After being paid, and especially if they are captured, the mercenaries’ commitment to the cause, in this case restoring the Venezuelan oligarchy to its former glory, may not be relied upon.

    Last week, one of the people arrested for the acts of violence and vandalism, Guido Rodríguez, confessed that he had been paid by opposition party Primero Justicia (PJ), the party of former presidential candidate Henrique Capriles, to vandalise and burn public buildings. Another captured member of the opposition also pointed the finger towards the higher-ups in PJ. For their part, PJ leaders shot themselves in the other foot with their reaction.


    Reaction from Primero Justicia Secretary General Tomás Guanipa: the left tweet from April 16 says “Guido Rodriguez swore in court that he was forced under torture to incriminate PJ and that it was all a lie”, and the right one from April 17 says “We have no idea who Guido Rodriguez is”

    Another tally that the media keep, with the help of US-funded NGOs, is of people arrested. One can only imagine what would happen if a few dozen hooligans set up a barricade in Manhattan’s 5th Avenue, or looted shops in London, or set fire to public buildings in Paris. Or if snipers were shooting at police officers. Furthermore, imagine there was publicly presented evidence that leaders of an extremist party, like the French FN or UKIP, had actually paid for these activities. The media would be cheering their arrests for weeks. But just like all deaths caused by the opposition are to be pinned on the government, any and all arrests are also arrests of “peaceful protesters” for political reasons.

    One of the people arrested in 2014 was Lorent Saleh. After Venezuelan intelligence services intercepted communications in which he was planning bombings and assassinations, he was deported by Colombia and arrested. But in the intercepted videos, some of which were publicly shown, Saleh named former Caracas mayor and key opposition leader Antonio Ledezma as the main man who made all these violent plans possible. Yet when Ledezma was arrested a few months later for his involvement in another coup attempt, we only heard the familiar propaganda of the authoritarian government getting rid of the democratic opposition. It seems that in Venezuela being democratic means only that you are getting money from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

    The truth is always there to be found if we are willing to look beyond the lies and propaganda. The State Department, the OAS and media can call in unison for the release of “political prisoners”, they can throw their weight behind the opposition’s amnesty bill. All we need to do is look at the contents of said amnesty bill to find a detailed confession of all the crimes that the opposition means to pardon. It goes from arson to terrorism funding to tax fraud, with everything in between. By referring to people guilty of these crimes as “political prisoners”, the mainstream media has embraced its role as another front in the war against Venezuela.


    Chaos and Resistance

    The opposition’s script is clear enough. With the national and international elites doing their part in the economic war and financial blockade, it is down to the political agents to do their part. This involves getting people out on the streets, something they have not always been able to do, and generating as much chaos as possible. Since the media, both the private Venezuelan outlets and international ones, ensure that violence and death always work in favour of the opposition, their hope is to trigger a chain of events that would lead to a coup like in 2002, or to a foreign military intervention (3). Or, in the worst case scenario, wear down chavismo to secure a victory in the next presidential election.

    But this is far from guaranteed. The fact that there are these constant plots for immediate regime-change shows that the opposition, and its foreign backers, are very invested in a coup scenario. There is also a reason why the violent barricades are set up in wealthy eastern Caracas and not in the barrios of western Caracas. Even if they are the most affected by the economic crisis, the Venezuelan poor and working class have shown time and again that they are committed to this project that, for the first time in history, gave them a voice and a leading role. And they are certainly not willing to hand power back to the elites.


    Chavistas during the April 19 demonstration supporting the government in Caracas


    Notes

    (1) Guarimba is the name given to violent anti-government protests, usually involving street barricades.

    (2) This is part of Venezuela’s housing mission GMVV (Gran Misión Vivienda Venezuela), which has provided 1.5M houses at little to no cost to poor and working class Venezuelans. These housing projects have been the target of hatred from the right-wing oligarchy, which sees them as an attack on its God-given right to make money from real estate speculation.

    (3) One of the opposition’s resident buffoons, David Smolansky, tweeted that the Maduro government was using chemical weapons (it was just tear gas), effectively urging the United States to bomb his own country!

    Cover photo: April 19 chavista march in support of the government in Caracas


    Source: Journal of Our America, Investig’Action


    Follow us on Facebook


    ©Copyright investig'action 2015
    -
    ShareThis Copy and Paste - See more at: http://www.investigaction.net/en/gua....GUhTKt3C.dpuf

Similar Threads

  1. How Nonviolence Protects the State.
    By PhoenixAsh in forum RevLeft Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21st April 2014, 22:34
  2. Does Anyone Actually Endorse Engels' Dialectic?
    By Proletarian Ultra in forum Theory
    Replies: 502
    Last Post: 14th October 2010, 21:05
  3. éirígí New Year Statement 2010
    By Conghaileach in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2nd January 2010, 21:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts