Thread: Question concerning abstract sociological concept

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date Dec 2016
    Posts 1
    Rep Power 0

    Default Question concerning abstract sociological concept

    I have had trouble grasping this notion of "natural social forces". What is meant by this? I understand it to be a historical and sociological concept on a surface level. just don't get it, though.
  2. #2
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 15,319
    Rep Power 65

    Default

    ---



    I have had trouble grasping this notion of "natural social forces". What is meant by this? I understand it to be a historical and sociological concept on a surface level. just don't get it, though.


    Historical materialism is a methodological approach to the study of human societies and their development over time that was first articulated by Karl Marx (1818–1883) as the materialist conception of history. It is principally a theory of history according to which the material conditions of a society's way of producing and reproducing the means of human existence or, in Marxist terms, the union of its productive capacity and social relations of production, fundamentally determine its organization and development.

    Historical materialism[1] looks for the causes of developments and changes in human society in the means by which humans collectively produce the necessities of life. Social classes and the relationship between them, along with the political structures and ways of thinking in society, are founded on and reflect contemporary economic activity.[2]

    Since Marx's time, the theory has been modified and expanded by Marxist writers. It now has many Marxist and non-Marxist variants.

    Marx's clearest formulation of his "materialist conception of history" was in the 1859 Preface to his book A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, whose relevant passage is reproduced here:

    "In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or — this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms — with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure. In studying such transformations it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophic — in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such a period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production."[5]

Similar Threads

  1. communization theory
    By BIXX in forum Learning
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 1st February 2015, 02:24
  2. Marx on Ordinary Language
    By ChrisK in forum Theory
    Replies: 189
    Last Post: 6th September 2010, 00:22
  3. Explaination for Stalin?
    By Teln3t in forum Learning
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 18th October 2009, 20:46
  4. Anarchist Critique of Vanguardism
    By jacobin1949 in forum Theory
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 19th November 2007, 01:06
  5. Mental labour
    By Amusing Scrotum in forum Theory
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 21st November 2005, 19:06

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts