Thread: US destroyer fires warning shots at Iranian patrol boats

Results 1 to 10 of 10

  1. #1
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,960
    Rep Power 63

    Default US destroyer fires warning shots at Iranian patrol boats

    US destroyer fires warning shots at Iranian patrol boats

    By Peter Symonds

    10 January 2017

    A US guided missile destroyer fired warning shots at Iranian patrol boats on Sunday, which, US defence officials claimed, engaged in “harassing” behaviour. The incident underscores the volatile situation in the Middle East and the potential for a rapid rise of US-Iranian tensions once Donald Trump assumes the US presidency.

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../iran-j10.html
  2. #2
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,960
    Rep Power 63

    Default Senators: Don't Attack Rex Tillerson for Opposing Some Sanctions on Iran

    Senators: Don't Attack Rex Tillerson for Opposing Some Sanctions on Iran

    Just Foreign Policy

    Dear Chris,

    Urge Senators not to attack Rex Tillerson for opposing some sanctions on Iran.

    Take Action

    Secretary of State-designee Rex Tillerson is being attacked by Marco Rubio, who wants more confrontation with Iran, for having opposed some sanctions on Iran in the past. Unfortunately, some Democratic groups, like American Bridge, are opportunistically supporting Rubio's attack.

    Urge your Senators not to attack Secretary of State-designee Rex Tillerson for having previously opposed some sanctions on Iran, by signing our petition at MoveOn.

    Every Member of Congress, Democrat or Republican, who supported diplomacy with Iran to address the issue of Iran's nuclear program at some point opposed some sanctions on Iran or sought to limit some sanctions on Iran. The Obama Administration opposed some sanctions on Iran and sought to limit some sanctions on Iran. Every NGO that supported diplomacy with Iran opposed some sanctions on Iran and sought to limit some sanctions on Iran. In particular, all these actors sought to limit sanctions on Iran so that they could be lifted if a diplomatic agreement with Iran on its nuclear agreement could be achieved, in order to make an agreement with Iran possible. It was common sense that if the goal of sanctions were to pressure Iran to negotiate an agreement, then Iran should believe that in the event of an agreement, those sanctions would be lifted.

    Urge Senators to oppose opportunistic attacks on Rex Tillerson related to Iran sanctions by signing and sharing our petition.

    Thanks for all you do to help make U.S. foreign policy more just,

    Robert Naiman, Avram Reisman, and Sarah Burns
    Just Foreign Policy

    If you think our work is important, support us with a $17 donation.
    http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate
    Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy

    © 2016 Just Foreign Policy

    Click here to unsubscribe

    empowered by Salsa
  3. #3
    Join Date Dec 2016
    Posts 183
    Rep Power 1

    Default

    These people of the US government are crazy. And then if there is a blowback terrorism in a baseball game or another crowded place, the corporate media along with US government and ruling class claim that they don't understand the reason of why United States of America is hated around the world. How stupid these people are, how lack of common sense. If a rapist rapes a girl, the parents of that girl would get violent against that rapist. So if the US Armed Forces have been raping the middle east countries for oil, it is very rational to expect middle east people to hate USA, to attack USA
  4. #4
    Join Date Feb 2011
    Posts 3,002
    Rep Power 57

    Default

    These people of the US government are crazy. And then if there is a blowback terrorism in a baseball game or another crowded place, the corporate media along with US government and ruling class claim that they don't understand the reason of why United States of America is hated around the world. How stupid these people are, how lack of common sense. If a rapist rapes a girl, the parents of that girl would get violent against that rapist. So if the US Armed Forces have been raping the middle east countries for oil, it is very rational to expect middle east people to hate USA, to attack USA
    They aren't crazy, they're just imperialists acting rationally as imperialists. And this isn't the "people" of the Middle East, it is the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp.
    Socialist Party of Outer Space
  5. #5
    Join Date Oct 2016
    Posts 109
    Organisation
    Socialist Worker Party
    Rep Power 2

    Default

    What
    Are
    you
    some liberal? You know the senators don't listen to noone
  6. #6
    Join Date Dec 2016
    Location originally: NYC; now: KS
    Posts 33
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    IMO, the situation will get much worse starting next week. My concerns about Mr. Trump have nothing to do with his domestic policies. My guess is that his presidency will be filled with so much instability and uncertainty that his agenda will get quickly sidelined. However, Donald Trump will have the nuclear codes. That is the real danger.
  7. #7
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,960
    Rep Power 63

    Default


    What
    Are
    you
    some liberal? You know the senators don't listen to noone

    Yeah, the disclaimer on all the 'inbox' stuff I post is that it's just f.y.i. -- maybe it gives the reader a good 'lay of the land', maybe it doesn't. I'm certainly not making any pro-liberal statements.
  8. #8
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,960
    Rep Power 63

    Default China and Russia to counter US anti-missile systems in Asia

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../chru-j14.html


    ---


    News Updates from CLG

    15 January 2017

    http://www.legitgov.org/

    All links are here:
    http://www.legitgov.org/#breaking_news

    Previous editions: Revealed: FBI returned Ft. Lauderdale shooter's gun a month before airport attack - law enforcement will not reveal why

    US troops enter Poland, 1st deployment at Russia's doorstep | 12 Jan 2017 | American soldiers rolled into Poland on Thursday, fulfilling a dream some Poles have had since the fall of communism in 1989 to have U.S. troops on their soil as a deterrent against Russia. Some people waved and held up American flags as U.S. troops in tanks and other vehicles crossed into southwestern Poland from Germany and headed toward the town of Zagan, where they will be based. Poland's prime minister and defense minister will welcome them in an official ceremony Saturday.

    US tanks and soldiers in Poland pose threat to Russia - Kremlin | 13 Jan 2017 | Russia sees the deployment of US tanks and other military vehicles, along with army personnel, as a threat to its national security and interests, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov said. "We see this as a threat. These actions pose a threat to our interests and security," Peskov told journalists on Thursday, stressing "especially, when a third country is beefing up its military presence along our borders with Europe. And this is not even a European country," he added. Eighty-seven battle tanks, 144 Bradley fighting vehicles, and over 3,000 soldiers are on their way from Germany to Poland.

    [...]
    Last edited by ckaihatsu; 15th January 2017 at 13:04. Reason: added second news source
  9. #9
    Join Date Mar 2008
    Location traveling (U.S.)
    Posts 14,960
    Rep Power 63

    Default US secretary of state issues war threat against Iran

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../iran-a20.html


    US secretary of state issues war threat against Iran

    By Bill Van Auken

    20 April 2017

    US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson issued a threat of military confrontation with Iran Wednesday at a hastily called news conference in which he drew a direct parallel to Washington’s reckless and increasingly dangerous confrontation with North Korea.

    Referring to the nuclear agreement negotiated between Iran and the major world powers, Tillerson said: “This deal represents the same failed approach of the past that brought us to the current imminent threat that we face from North Korea. The Trump administration has no intention of passing the buck to a future administration on Iran. The evidence is clear: Iran’s provocative actions threaten the United States, the region and the world.”

    The Trump administration had acknowledged on Tuesday that Iran has fully complied with the terms of the nuclear agreement that it negotiated in July 2015 with the so-called P5+1—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States plus Germany. In the same breath, however, it signaled that it is preparing measures designed to blow the agreement up.

    In a formal notification required every 90 days to the US Congress—the first delivered since Trump’s inauguration—Secretary of State Tillerson certified that, as of April 18, Iran was meeting its terms of the deal, which required it to cap its uranium enrichment, reduce its number of centrifuges by two-thirds and submit to international inspections to ensure compliance. These terms were supposed to preclude Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon, something which Tehran insisted it had never sought.

    The rest of Tillerson’s statement, however, revealed that the Trump administration is conducting a systematic review of all of the economic and financial sanctions that were waived in return for Iran’s reining in of its nuclear program.

    Iran, the secretary of state alleged, “remains a leading sponsor of terror through many platforms and methods,” and therefore Trump “has directed a National Security Council-led interagency review of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action that will evaluate whether suspension of sanctions related to Iran pursuant to the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the formal name of the Iran nuclear deal) is vital to the national security interests of the United States.”

    On Wednesday, White House spokesman Sean Spicer deflected a direct question as to whether the administration was seeking to abrogate the nuclear agreement, saying that the “inter-agency review” would be concluded in 90 days and would serve as the basis for policy recommendations.

    “We're well aware of any potential negative impacts that an action could have,” he added, in relation to the re-imposition of suspended sanctions.

    Indeed such “negative impacts” are precisely the purpose of taking this action, which would be designed to provoke Iran into repudiating its own obligations under the nuclear agreement and thereby creating the pretext for US military aggression.

    Thus, even as Washington is pushing the world to the brink of a potential nuclear confrontation on the Korean peninsula, it is laying the foundations for another catastrophic war in the Middle East.

    During his 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly denounced the Iran nuclear agreement as “the worst deal ever negotiated” and vowed to “rip it up” once elected.

    In February, his since ousted national security advisor Gen. Michael Flynn marched into a White House briefing to ominously announce that he was putting “Iran on notice,” implying possible US military retaliation for the Iranian military’s testing of non-nuclear missiles, which is not barred by the nuclear agreement.

    And last month, Gen. Joseph Votel, the chief of US Central Command, which oversees the American wars and interventions in the Middle East and Central Asia, denounced Iran as the “greatest long-term threat to stability” in the Middle East and advocated a campaign to “disrupt [Iran] through military means or other means.”

    The latest escalation of these threats came as Trump’s defense secretary, Gen. James “Mad Dog” Mattis, is conducting a tour of the Middle East, with meetings scheduled with Iran’s principal regional enemies, including the Saudi and Qatari monarchies and Israel.

    Mattis has reportedly advocated a policy of increasing the already massive US military aid and arms sales to the Saudi royal dictatorship and providing more direct US collaboration in its more than two-year-old war against the impoverished population of Yemen, which has killed some 12,000 people, the majority of them civilians, turned 3 million into refugees and left large portions of the population on the brink of starvation.

    Speaking to reporters in Riyadh after meeting with Saudi King Salman and Deputy Crown Prince and minister of defense Mohammed bin Salman, Mattis declared, “Everywhere you look if there is trouble in the region, you find Iran.” He added, “We will have to overcome Iran’s efforts to destabilize yet another country and create another militia in their image of Lebanese Hezbollah but the bottom line is we are on the right path for it.”

    The charges of Iranian “destabilization” stem from Iran’s objective position as Washington’s rival for regional hegemony in the Middle East and its participation, alongside Russia, in defending the government of Syria against the US-orchestrated war for regime change.

    The hypocrisy of Washington’s labeling Iran as a sponsor of terrorism and the source of all “trouble in the region” is shameless. US imperialism has carried out a series of wars that have killed millions, toppled governments and devastated entire societies. The CIA has armed and funded terrorist Islamist groups in Libya, Iraq and Syria, including those directly tied to Al Qaeda.

    In Yemen, the Pentagon has supplied the warplanes, bombs and missiles that have slaughtered men, women and children, while offering intelligence assistance as well as mid-air refueling to enable round-the-clock bombing aimed at crushing the Yemeni population’s resistance and compelling them to accept the re-imposition of the puppet regime of ousted President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi.

    Now, the Pentagon is reportedly preparing to directly assist a Saudi-UAE offensive to conquer the Yemeni port of Hodeida, the last link between the country’s starving population and the outside world. Aid agencies have warned that such an attack may well tip the country into a full-blown famine.

    Speaking alongside the Saudi deputy crown prince on Wednesday, Mattis offered an obsequious tribute to the 31-year-old “royal highness” while vowing to “reinforce Saudi Arabia's resistance to Iran’s mischief and make you more effective with your military as we work together as partners.”

    Mattis went on to declare that it was in the US “interest to see a strong Saudi Arabia military security service and secret services,” this in a country where the “secret services” ruthlessly repress any manifestation of dissent and where criticism of the ruling royal family is grounds for beheading.

    As with the attack on Syria, the ratchetting up of tensions with Russia and the ongoing nuclear brinksmanship with North Korea, the Trump administration has enjoyed crucial support from the Democrats for the buildup toward war with Iran. Key Democratic members of the House and Senate have joined with Republicans in supporting the imposition of new sanctions. From the 2016 presidential campaign onward, the Democrats’ criticisms of Trump have been focused centrally on foreign policy and have come from the right, particularly over concern that the Trump administration would prove “too soft” on Russia, and, by extension, Iran, which has allied itself with Russia in Syria.

    Copyright © 1998-2017 World Socialist Web Site - All rights reserved
  10. #10
    Join Date Dec 2016
    Posts 183
    Rep Power 1

    Default

    Yeah that's the strategy of US empire, it resorts to harassing enemy states, so that those enemies nations fight back and then that way US imperialist rulers have a justification to invade that enemy state that the US has been harassing. And then the pro-war imperialist media, twists reality, rapes reality by telling the US masses that the USA must declare a war against that enemy state in order to protect the beacon of christianity, freedom and love that they live in


    US destroyer fires warning shots at Iranian patrol boats

    By Peter Symonds

    10 January 2017

    A US guided missile destroyer fired warning shots at Iranian patrol boats on Sunday, which, US defence officials claimed, engaged in “harassing” behaviour. The incident underscores the volatile situation in the Middle East and the potential for a rapid rise of US-Iranian tensions once Donald Trump assumes the US presidency.

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017.../iran-j10.html
  11. The Following User Says Thank You to TomLeftist For This Useful Post:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Website Security Test