appearance

[condor]

Marxists think it is enough to see past the surface appearance to reality. Actually, even reality is deceptive.

You must delve past reality into sub-reality, how somebody behaves out of the spotlight.

When you see reality, you are in the right place, but you are most likely not in the right time. You need to see
how somebody behaves most of the time, not just in one situation.

[Red Spark]

If I may ask, what makes you think that? Apologies if I am mistaken, but I think the problems of Marxists in winning other people is that most(non-Marxist) people come from the perception that the appearance is reality. I don't think Marxists take what is apparent as reality(I assumed that is what you said, apologies if it was not) rather the opposite.

[condor]

No. I said you have to go past reality into quantum mechanics. You have to go past how someone behaves in the public sphere into how they treat their children and spouse, like Private EYe does. Marxists should have concentrated on the expenses of British MPs before the scandal.

[Red Spark]

No. I said you have to go past reality into quantum mechanics. You have to go past how someone behaves in the public sphere into how they treat their children and spouse, like Private EYe does. Marxists should have concentrated on the expenses of British MPs before the scandal.

Still didn't understand you. To be honest I'm not familiar with 'Private Eye' or the MPs' case you mentioned(probably due to my geographic location). But one thing I might ask is why should we understand what a person thinks personally? What difference will it make if an outspoken conservative behaves nicely with his family or if he doesn't? I don't really see where you're coming from. Anyway, I'm a rookie; so, probably others might answer, or question, you better.