View Poll Results: What is your tendency

Voters 112. This poll is closed
  • leninist

    6 5.36%
  • Marxist leninist

    19 16.96%
  • Trotskyist

    10 8.93%
  • left communist

    30 26.79%
  • anarchist

    20 17.86%
  • Other (specify)

    27 24.11%

Thread: tendency?

Results 1 to 20 of 300

  1. #1
    Join Date Apr 2014
    Location United States
    Posts 59
    Rep Power 5

    Default tendency?

    What is your tendency?
    If other please specify.

    I have no idea how to start a poll so sorry.

    1. leninist
    2 . Marxist leninist
    3. Trotskyist
    4. Left communist
    5. Anarchist
    6 other (specify)
  2. #2
    Join Date Jan 2012
    Location New York
    Posts 2,191
    Rep Power 44

    Default

    Anarchist Communist with influences from nihilism, individualist anarchism, syndicalism, Marx n Engels and so on
    "But here steps in Satan, the eternal rebel, the first free-thinker and emancipator of worlds. He makes man ashamed of his bestial ignorance and obedience; he emancipates him, stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity, in urging him to disobey and eat of the fruit of knowledge." ~Mikhail Bakunin
  3. #3
    Communism or Civilization Committed User
    Join Date Jul 2013
    Location Apparently Denmark
    Posts 1,748
    Organisation
    Bordiga Society of North America
    Rep Power 35

    Default

    trotskyists, Marxist-leninists and many left communists (it varies for the lefts but many uphold much of Lenin) consider themselves leninists. Plus you got your social democrats, your Kauts (Orthodox Marxism), your ultra lefts, your councilists and a couple more. Not to mention many of these categories can then be broken down a bit more.
    "We must flee from Time, we must create a life that is feminine and human - it is these imperative objectives that must guide us in this world heavy with catastrophes."
    Jacques Camatte, Echos from the Past

    "For example, to say that the relation between industrial capital and the class of the wage workers is expressed in precisely the same way in Belgium and Thailand, and that the praxis of their respective struggles should be established without taking into account in either of the two cases the factors of race or nationality, does not mean you are an extremist, but it means in effect that you have understood nothing of Marxism."
    Amadeo Bordiga, Factors of Race and Nation in the Marxist Analysis
  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Remus Bleys For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Join Date Sep 2013
    Posts 1,168
    Organisation
    First-World Lepidan Communist International (Fight Back!)
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Most people who have a tendency actually put it in their tendency line in their profile, so that people will be aware.
  6. #5
    Join Date Oct 2013
    Posts 622
    Rep Power 18

    Default

    Amusing how many leftcoms there are.
  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Hrafn For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location The Netherlands
    Posts 8,033
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Anarchists and Left-Coms make up the majority of the board.

    But notice how Marxist seems to be missing.
  9. #7
    Join Date Jul 2013
    Location Da You Kay
    Posts 1,155
    Organisation
    CPGB-ML
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Amusing how many leftcoms there are.
    In the real world the majority of communists are M-Ls and M-L-Ms. Just this board is fucked.
  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Comrade Jacob For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Join Date Apr 2014
    Location United States
    Posts 59
    Rep Power 5

    Default

    In the poll? I have no idea how I forgot that lol
    (To Phoenixash)
  12. The Following User Says Thank You to flaming bolshevik For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date Dec 2012
    Location T' North
    Posts 1,174
    Organisation
    Suicide Brigade
    Rep Power 39

    Default

    In the real world the majority of communists are M-Ls and M-L-Ms. Just this board is fucked.
    5 MLs= 1 left comm. Quantitative into a qualitative change- dialectics.
    Segui il tuo corso e lascia dir le genti.

    Socialism resides entirely in the revolutionary negation of the capitalist ENTERPRISE, not in granting the enterprise to the factory workers.
    - Bordiga
  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Brutus For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Communism or Civilization Committed User
    Join Date Jul 2013
    Location Apparently Denmark
    Posts 1,748
    Organisation
    Bordiga Society of North America
    Rep Power 35

    Default

    "Left communists"
    "We must flee from Time, we must create a life that is feminine and human - it is these imperative objectives that must guide us in this world heavy with catastrophes."
    Jacques Camatte, Echos from the Past

    "For example, to say that the relation between industrial capital and the class of the wage workers is expressed in precisely the same way in Belgium and Thailand, and that the praxis of their respective struggles should be established without taking into account in either of the two cases the factors of race or nationality, does not mean you are an extremist, but it means in effect that you have understood nothing of Marxism."
    Amadeo Bordiga, Factors of Race and Nation in the Marxist Analysis
  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Remus Bleys For This Useful Post:


  17. #11
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Nekromantik Norway
    Posts 749
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    What do you mean?
    "What is necessary is to go beyond any false opposition of programme versus spontaneity. Communism is both the self-activity of the proletariat and the rigorous theoretical critique that expresses and anticipates it."
    -----
    "...Stalinism is eternally condemned to govern capital, and the ideological dynamics of Stalinism are tied to this peculiar type of capital management; it is locked within this framework, reproducing the logic of capitalism under the veil of communism. For this reason, Stalinism, and its various derivatives, cannot accurately be regarded as communist if we choose to define it in materialist terms." - Tim Cornelis
  18. #12
    Join Date Jul 2013
    Location Da You Kay
    Posts 1,155
    Organisation
    CPGB-ML
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Probably that he thinks that other left-coms and not real left-coms
  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Comrade Jacob For This Useful Post:


  20. #13
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Netherlands
    Posts 4,478
    Rep Power 106

    Default

    In the real world the majority of communists are M-Ls and M-L-Ms. Just this board is fucked.
    Or maybe the opposite. But then it's disputable whether MLs are communists at all.
    pew pew pew
  21. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Tim Cornelis For This Useful Post:


  22. #14
    Join Date Aug 2013
    Posts 1,489
    Rep Power 24

    Default

    i'm a communist with an infantile disorder.

  23. #15
    Join Date Feb 2013
    Posts 188
    Rep Power 9

    Default

    No strict tendency, I prefer to think of myself as a communist without adjectives, recognising that even even those from within a tendency I might not necessarily agree with might still actually have something worthwhile to say.

    I suppose I tick the boxes of a Left Leninist in many ways, but I'd hesitate to fully embrace the label of 'Leninist' lest I implicitly forfeit the insights that many from other tendencies might have to contribute.
  24. #16
    Join Date May 2014
    Location Britain
    Posts 111
    Rep Power 6

    Default

    I feel there's some irony in a follower of Bakunin telling me that I'm not a communist.
    Socialism cannot abstract itself from individual interests. Socialist society alone can most fully satisfy these personal interests. More than that; socialist society alone can firmly safeguard the interests of the individual. In this sense there is no irreconcilable contrast between “individualism” and socialism. But can we deny the contrast between classes, between the propertied class, the capitalist class, and the toiling class, the proletarian class?” - Josef Stalin, Marxism Versus Liberalism: An Interview With H.G. Wells, 1934
    "Those who are in ideology believe themselves by definition outside ideology: one of the effects of ideology is the practical denegation of the ideological character of ideology by ideology: ideology never says, ‘I am ideological’." - Louis Althusser, Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, 1969
  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BolshevikBabe For This Useful Post:


  26. #17
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Netherlands
    Posts 4,478
    Rep Power 106

    Default

    I feel there's some irony in a follower of Bakunin telling me that I'm not a communist.
    Neo-Bakuninism is a joke tendency.

    Or DNZ neologism, but that's not really mutually exclusive.

    Try again.
    pew pew pew
  27. The Following User Says Thank You to Tim Cornelis For This Useful Post:


  28. #18
    Join Date May 2008
    Location Everett, WA, USA
    Posts 2,467
    Organisation
    Communist Labor Party
    Rep Power 68

    Default

    Libertarian Marxist or Marxian Anarcho-Communist.
    "I have declared war on the rich who prosper on our poverty, the politicians who lie to us with smiling faces, and all the mindless, heartless robots who protect them and their property." - Assata Shakur
  29. #19
    Join Date Dec 2013
    Posts 1,047
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    I've become more and more unable to associate myself with any specific tendency/ideology/whatever as time goes on. I'm much too disagreeable and nitpicky about every little thing to describe myself as an X or a Y, knowing that people will assume Z about me based on something that I disagree with the majority of the tendency about. Right now I have tabs open with unfinished readings from both Bakunin and Mao. And although I originally got into the whole idea of "communism" from reading Lenin, I have a particular fondness for Emma Goldman's writings and even quoted her earlier today in another post. Tentatively speaking, when pressed, I answer that I'm an anarchist-communist, but I still draw from Lenin fairly extensively and haven't made up my mind about him as a revolutionary one way or another.

    I want to just be able to say I'm not sure and need to research more, but I said the same thing years ago and I'm even more lost now than I was before. The entire debate at this point strikes me kinda like a game of revolutionary team sports where the tendencies, when they're not just trolling each other about some shit that neither side fully understands, are at each other's throats about some shit that happened 200 years ago... that we'll never be able to definitively answer because the information to do so just isn't there. And then when I make a post it always ends up being way too long and full of frivolous information, none of which I feel I can cut out that would allow me to maintain the same accuracy in conveying my thoughts.
  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to consuming negativity For This Useful Post:


  31. #20
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 192
    Rep Power 11

    Default

    Fuck if I know
  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Crabbensmasher For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. what don't you like about your tendency?
    By ed miliband in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 122
    Last Post: 29th June 2012, 10:37
  2. Tendency?
    By Red North in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27th April 2010, 02:31

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread