View Poll Results: What is your tendency

Voters 112. This poll is closed
  • leninist

    6 5.36%
  • Marxist leninist

    19 16.96%
  • Trotskyist

    10 8.93%
  • left communist

    30 26.79%
  • anarchist

    20 17.86%
  • Other (specify)

    27 24.11%

Thread: tendency?

Results 41 to 60 of 300

  1. #41
    Join Date Jun 2014
    Location Murica
    Posts 73
    Rep Power 6

    Default

    Other: socialist.
    "By what standard of morality can the violence used by a slave to break his chains be considered the same as the violence of a slave master?" (Walter Rodney, 1969)
  2. #42

    Default

    Come again?
    The artist formerly known as Ace Steel
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Psycho P and the Freight Train For This Useful Post:


  4. #43
    Join Date Jun 2013
    Location Kingston Upon Hull
    Posts 407
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    easiest description is anarchist-communist but yeah, like a lot of folks here I take stuff from a variety of anticapitalist streams of thought and i prefer overall not to stick myself in a box. Aside from a tankie phase in my early teens I got interested in libertarian politics via SPGB stuff when i was about 18-19 (I was searching for parties in the UK that remotely lined up with what I thought) and whilst i can't say i'm a SPGB sympathiser they certainly introduced me to libertarian socialism so I can thank whoever sent me a bunch of old (like, fifty year old stock) pamphlets when I subscribed to the Socialist Standard for like a year for that.
  5. #44
    Join Date Feb 2013
    Location dying in a den in Bombay
    Posts 4,142
    Organisation
    sympatiser, ICL-FI
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    The sparts are hardly left-communist...
    He's right, though. Sure, we maintain a facade of ultra-Cannonite Trotskyism but when no one's looking, we get smashed, cry over a picture of our dear, unfortunately departed comrade Bordiga and wipe our dicks with a reproduction of the treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Anglo-Saxon Philistine For This Useful Post:


  7. #45
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    In the real world the majority of communists are M-Ls and M-L-Ms. Just this board is fucked.
    In the world most people who identify as communists subscribe to 'Socialism with Chinese Characteristics'. Numbers of adherents do not represent a proxy for truth - if it did then Christianity would be right!

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TC For This Useful Post:


  9. #46
    Join Date Apr 2003
    Location In flux
    Posts 6,095
    Rep Power 54

    Default

    To answer the poll question:

    I have come to the conclusion that identifying with long dead political thinkers, movements, governments and movements is ahistorical and counterproductive. There was no 'us' and 'them' whomever you think those are back in 1917 because none of us or our close collaborators were around and politically active at the time. Questions of historical interpretation and loyalty to sides in generations old struggles should never take priority over critical, undogmatic, open consideration of the questions of political morality and priority of our time.

    Adopting a tendency in reference to a long gone or greatly depleted movement leads others to dismiss their position due to presumed disagreements and encourages uncritical defense of the established line of that position.

    So I don't claim to have a tendency.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TC For This Useful Post:


  11. #47
    Join Date Sep 2002
    Posts 6,039
    Rep Power 59

    Default

    I think tendency is basically an irrelevant question unless one belongs to a party, and even then its usefulness is sometimes questionable.
    "to become a philosopher, start by walking very slowly"
  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to synthesis For This Useful Post:


  13. #48
    illuminaughty reptillington Committed User
    Join Date Apr 2012
    Location al-Buu r'Qhueque, New Mex
    Posts 1,278
    Organisation
    mayonnaise clinic
    Rep Power 25

    Default

    Anarchists and Left-Coms make up the majority of the board.

    But notice how Marxist seems to be missing.
    That's because if plain ol' Marxist was on there everybody would choose that cause Marx was cool beans.
    BANS GOT YOU PARANOID? I MADE A GROUP FOR YOU! http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1349 NOW OPEN FOR EVERYBODY!!!

    "Think for yourself; question authority."
    - Timothy Lenin
  14. #49
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    Pot. Kettle. Black.
    Im glad to be sectarian to anybody whose wrong about a majority of political science. Especially if they are discussing he world cup on the forum.
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  15. #50
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    He's right, though. Sure, we maintain a facade of ultra-Cannonite Trotskyism but when no one's looking, we get smashed, cry over a picture of our dear, unfortunately departed comrade Bordiga and wipe our dicks with a reproduction of the treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
    You also support NAMBLA. Your members are purposely disruptive at events we plan because of our supposed "reformist" anti austerity ideas regarding city college of SF. Also ultraleftism existed before bordiga..
    Last edited by Geiseric; 16th June 2014 at 04:18.
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Geiseric For This Useful Post:


  17. #51
    Join Date Jun 2003
    Location Western North Cack
    Posts 2,502
    Organisation
    Lorena Bobbit Fan Club
    Rep Power 36

    Default

    I have a tendency to freak out.
    I dreamt of a flower that was so beautiful that when it whithered away and died a tear left my eye. I saw our births, our lives and our deaths. I felt fire paint me with pain and I felt a kiss on my lips with a knife in my neck. Love to heartbreak to self-destruction to birth and to finally learning to frolic back into the same trap with a warm smile.

    O|O

    My blog: The Riot Slut Rage
  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bad Grrrl Agro For This Useful Post:


  19. #52
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location The Netherlands
    Posts 8,033
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    To answer the poll question:

    I have come to the conclusion that identifying with long dead political thinkers, movements, governments and movements is ahistorical and counterproductive. There was no 'us' and 'them' whomever you think those are back in 1917 because none of us or our close collaborators were around and politically active at the time. Questions of historical interpretation and loyalty to sides in generations old struggles should never take priority over critical, undogmatic, open consideration of the questions of political morality and priority of our time.

    Adopting a tendency in reference to a long gone or greatly depleted movement leads others to dismiss their position due to presumed disagreements and encourages uncritical defense of the established line of that position.

    So I don't claim to have a tendency.
    I think tendency is basically an irrelevant question unless one belongs to a party, and even then its usefulness is sometimes questionable.

    While I do not disagree with either of you

    ...there is a huge difference between debating a anarcho-communist and an anarcho-individualist for example.

    Tendency places the discussion in context.
  20. The Following User Says Thank You to PhoenixAsh For This Useful Post:


  21. #53
    Join Date Sep 2002
    Posts 6,039
    Rep Power 59

    Default

    While I do not disagree with either of you

    ...there is a huge difference between debating a anarcho-communist and an anarcho-individualist for example.

    Tendency places the discussion in context.
    What's the "huge difference," though? Which positions one can read into the other person's arguments? The only way I can see it being useful is for one or the other to say that "That's not something an anarcho-communist/individualist would say," which is a valid point if someone is directly identifying themselves as such, but otherwise when it comes to individual debates the tendency shouldn't matter so much as the arguments themselves and the people making them.
    "to become a philosopher, start by walking very slowly"
  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to synthesis For This Useful Post:


  23. #54
    Join Date Jan 2011
    Location The Netherlands
    Posts 8,033
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    What's the "huge difference," though? Which positions one can read into the other person's arguments? The only way I can see it being useful is for one or the other to say that "That's not something an anarcho-communist/individualist would say," which is a valid point if someone is directly identifying themselves as such, but otherwise when it comes to individual debates the tendency shouldn't matter so much as the arguments themselves and the people making them.
    The difference is the focus on the economic system and interpretation of analysis. This is not immediately apparant but Ac's and AI's usually tend to look at the same situation differently and intepret it differently. This results in different meaning of the same terms.
  24. The Following User Says Thank You to PhoenixAsh For This Useful Post:


  25. #55
    Join Date Oct 2009
    Location Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts 4,407
    Organisation
    none...yet
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    Im glad to be sectarian to anybody whose wrong about a majority of political science. Especially if they are discussing he world cup on the forum.
    Come at me you self-righteous silly prick.

    Oh yeah, broadly left communist. Or not that broadly; depends on the perspective.

    EDIT:

    Left communism exists on this foum and in the spartacist league.
    Seems like you know fuck all about the communist left. I might spell it out for you why this represents only a laughable confusion, but I'll let 870 (what a spectacularly terrible change in username) do that.

    Also, there are functioning international organizations within this political current.
    Last edited by Thirsty Crow; 16th June 2014 at 10:13.
    FKA LinksRadikal
    “The possibility of securing for every member of society, by means of socialized production, an existence not only fully sufficient materially, and becoming day by day more full, but an existence guaranteeing to all the free development and exercise of their physical and mental faculties – this possibility is now for the first time here, but it is here.” Friedrich Engels

    "The proletariat is its struggle; and its struggles have to this day not led it beyond class society, but deeper into it." Friends of the Classless Society

    "Your life is survived by your deeds" - Steve von Till
  26. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Thirsty Crow For This Useful Post:


  27. #56
    Join Date May 2011
    Location Nekromantik Norway
    Posts 749
    Rep Power 30

    Default

    Left communism exists on this foum and in the spartacist league.
    In practice their members act in an ultra left fashion. Sectarianism and ultraleftism go hand in hand.
    Im glad to be sectarian to anybody whose wrong about a majority of political science. Especially if they are discussing he world cup on the forum.
    Well, there is at least one thing the left-comms are better at: trolling. Cause these are some really poor attempts at it.

    Also, there are functioning international organizations within this political current.
    But if they don't participate in the high-point of class struggle that is the campaign going on at the San Francisco Community College, of what use are these organisations?
    "What is necessary is to go beyond any false opposition of programme versus spontaneity. Communism is both the self-activity of the proletariat and the rigorous theoretical critique that expresses and anticipates it."
    -----
    "...Stalinism is eternally condemned to govern capital, and the ideological dynamics of Stalinism are tied to this peculiar type of capital management; it is locked within this framework, reproducing the logic of capitalism under the veil of communism. For this reason, Stalinism, and its various derivatives, cannot accurately be regarded as communist if we choose to define it in materialist terms." - Tim Cornelis
  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Zukunftsmusik For This Useful Post:


  29. #57
    Join Date Oct 2009
    Location Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts 4,407
    Organisation
    none...yet
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    But if they don't participate in the high-point of class struggle that is the campaign going on at the San Francisco Community College, of what use are these organisations?
    Don't forget they don't even recruit predominantly at college campuses and don't prepare their cadre for some NGO well paid positions. That just seems like poor business logic.
    FKA LinksRadikal
    “The possibility of securing for every member of society, by means of socialized production, an existence not only fully sufficient materially, and becoming day by day more full, but an existence guaranteeing to all the free development and exercise of their physical and mental faculties – this possibility is now for the first time here, but it is here.” Friedrich Engels

    "The proletariat is its struggle; and its struggles have to this day not led it beyond class society, but deeper into it." Friends of the Classless Society

    "Your life is survived by your deeds" - Steve von Till
  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Thirsty Crow For This Useful Post:


  31. #58
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    Don't forget they don't even recruit predominantly at college campuses and don't prepare their cadre for some NGO well paid positions. That just seems like poor business logic.
    Well you didnt answer his question. What is the left communist international actually doing?
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan
  32. #59
    Join Date Oct 2009
    Location Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts 4,407
    Organisation
    none...yet
    Rep Power 78

    Default

    Well you didnt answer his question. What is the left communist international actually doing?
    Whose question?

    What I did though was to refer to the idea that left communism exists on this forum and...in the Spartacists' case. Both points are utterly ridiculous. So I'm not surprised you'd try to shift the debate to e-dick swinging contest of "and what are you doing huh huh huh?". It's reasonable that you'd try to conceal your idiocy in this way.
    FKA LinksRadikal
    “The possibility of securing for every member of society, by means of socialized production, an existence not only fully sufficient materially, and becoming day by day more full, but an existence guaranteeing to all the free development and exercise of their physical and mental faculties – this possibility is now for the first time here, but it is here.” Friedrich Engels

    "The proletariat is its struggle; and its struggles have to this day not led it beyond class society, but deeper into it." Friends of the Classless Society

    "Your life is survived by your deeds" - Steve von Till
  33. #60
    Join Date Sep 2009
    Location san fransisco
    Posts 3,637
    Organisation
    The 4th International
    Rep Power 41

    Default

    Whose question?

    What I did though was to refer to the idea that left communism exists on this forum and...in the Spartacists' case. Both points are utterly ridiculous. So I'm not surprised you'd try to shift the debate to e-dick swinging contest of "and what are you doing huh huh huh?". It's reasonable that you'd try to conceal your idiocy in this way.
    Youd be surprised to see how often the sparts sling the same buzzwords such as "reformist" and "right wing social democrat". They exist to sell their paper, bashing other left groups and acting more radical than everybody else, although when i ask them how their plan differentiates from ours on the main issues, they change the subject, like you just did. We are actually organizing while they disrupt our meetings, call us class traitors, and try to make themselves feel important.

    Does this image ring any bells? Any discussion about SYRIZA devolved into this. Its devolved into slander as left communists claim my comrades are members of the SPD.
    For student organizing in california, join this group!
    http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=1036
    http://socialistorganizer.org/
    "[I]t’s hard to keep potent historical truths bottled up forever. New data repositories are uncovered. New, less ideological, generations of historians grow up. In the late 1980s and before, Ann Druyan and I would routinely smuggle copies of Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution into the USSR—so our colleagues could know a little about their own political beginnings.”
    --Carl Sagan

Similar Threads

  1. what don't you like about your tendency?
    By ed miliband in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 122
    Last Post: 29th June 2012, 10:37
  2. Tendency?
    By Red North in forum Social and off topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27th April 2010, 02:31

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread