Results 1 to 20 of 46
stupid fuck -- good timing after so many of us were hating on the NDP
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspa...usic_fund.html
Sure, it's stating the obvious, but they're all pretty lousy...
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
It's a bad bunch. Trying to convince myself to vote NDP. Or spoil my ballot. I always wait til election day in case there's a meaningful shift. Not clear what the lesser evil is.
Andrea Horwath is a joke to any serious socialist. The lamentations for the squeezing of the middle class and promises to said middle class of tax breaks or tax credits might appeal to my folks in suburbia, but she has zilch to offer workers who oppose capitalist exploitation.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
Nooo didn't you hear, some Trotskyist students in Toronto are juuust about to take the NDP over for the working class and bring it to power on a socialist platform.
Envoyé de mon SGH-I747M en utilisant Tapatalk
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/comme...m_salutin.html
I don't know what to say about this right now, but it speaks for itself anyway.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
Spoil your ballot.
"A new centrist project does not have to repeat these mistakes. Nobody in this topic is advocating a carbon copy of the Second International (which again was only partly centrist)." (Tjis, class-struggle anarchist)
"A centrist strategy is based on patience, and building a movement or party or party-movement through deploying various instruments, which I think should include: workplace organising, housing struggles [...] and social services [...] and a range of other activities such as sports and culture. These are recruitment and retention tools that allow for a platform for political education." (Tim Cornelis, left-communist)
The life we have conferred upon these objects confronts us as something hostile and alien.
Formerly Virgin Molotov Cocktail (11/10/2004 - 21/08/2013)
I've been contemplating this...What exactly is the difference in effect between this and openly refusing to legitimize the bourgeois electoral system? Either way, you don't cast a vote for a bourgeois party, but the ballot-spoiling approach just seems to be a more subtle legitimization of the system, or at some cases an overt campaign for electoral reform (see: Great Canadian Blank-Ballot Project).
If you're not going to "strategically" endorse the "least worst" bourgeois party, it seems to only make sense to go all the way and openly refuse to participate in the farce. After all, if nobody thinks anyone else would be that "extreme", that position will remain relegated to the shadows of alienated individual minds. It's the same problem with casting an actual "strategic vote" because you think (however correctly) that voting for the smaller bourgeois parties won't accomplish anything.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
Also, this:
http://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/ontario-...bate-1.1826550
Holy ****ing **** what the ****ing hell? Are we really repeating this debate all over again at the provincial level? Just another demonstration of how trying to worm our way into "mainstream" political discourse by adopting electoralist tactics is doomed to go nowhere.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
I`m voting Socialist Party of Ontario. Anyways... It`s actually a very interesting time in that the NDP are well to the right of the Liberals.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/comme...poor_goar.html
why even bother with this?
"whatever they might make would never be the same as that world of dark streets and bright dreams"
http://youtu.be/g-PwIDYbDqI
Another odd turn.
http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario_...ries_cohn.html
I wasn't even bothering with news precisely because of this kind of attitude but whatevs.
We've been protesting the Liberal government. The Conservatives were going to destroy the union movement but have back tracked because of pressure within their own caucus. The social democratic NDP have moved to the right of the Liberals on most issues totally changing the game, and forcing the unions to distance themselves from the NDP. Anyways, shit be fucked up!
It might provide space for new parties of the Left -- not holding my breath, but going to work towards that and be ready for some serious shit storms over the next few years.
that is your answer to anything dnz.
social dems and prinicples? lol.
nothing really, but dnz loves spoiling and makes propaganda for it no matter what the situation.
why the hope for a new left party? so it can go the way of the ndp only way quicker than the ndp did? seen it all before in germany, the left "alternatives" to the spd did go the way of the spd only way way faster.
All i want is a Marxist Hunk.
It is true that labor produces for the rich wonderful things – but for the worker it produces privation. It produces palaces – but for the worker, hovels. It produces beauty – but for the worker, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back into barbarous types of labor and it turns the other section into a machine. It produces intelligence – but for the worker, stupidity, cretinism.
Wer hat uns verraten? Sozialdemokraten!
I agree, despite not being from Ontario or a Canadian I would definitely vote for the Socialist Party of Ontario as well especially since they were formed in opposition to the NDP's rightward shift.
"Without general elections, without freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, without the free battle of opinions... bureaucracy rises as the only deciding factor." - Rosa Luxemburg
"The capitalist class is represented by the Republican, Democratic, Populist and Prohibition parties, all of which stand for private ownership of the means of production..." - Eugene Victor "Gene" Debs
"...a democratic, national government that is revolutionary and popular. That is how socialism begins, not with decrees." - Salvador Allende Gossens
Because the outcome will have implications for class struggle in Ontario?
I'm against any form of electoral participation, but that doesn't mean we should ignore it completely, either. Of course I'm biased since I'm from Ontario and know people who's financial ability to attend university, or ability to find a public-sector job in say, teaching, would be impacted if Hudak is elected, so people I know give a shit whether I think they should or not...
Point being, I understand and agree with that attitude, but there has to be some way to engage with people or at least pay attention. What would you suggest (I'm honestly curious)?
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
Just fyi, they're only actually running in two ridings, so statistically speaking you probably wouldn't be able to vote for them.
"I'm a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will." - Antonio Gramsci
"If he did advocate revolutionary change, such advocacy could not, of course, receive constitutional protection, since it would be by definition anti-constitutional."
- J.A. MacGuigan in Roach v. Canada, 1994
Thanks Brad. And just to add -- there's been a massive shift in the Ontario economy away from manufacturing and more and more towards resource extraction. And that's a whole new set of economic problems and ecological problems. I'll be curious to see if the CP picks up votes this election. They're running 12 candidates this time. Their platform is quite good but I never really understand their approach to elections. Not sure about the CPC ML, they're pretty weird some places and totally cool other spots.
Most of the population is in Southern Ontario. Where is the shift to resource extraction occurring, and who benefits?