Results 1 to 5 of 5
More proof that the DPRK is anything but a worker's Republic or remotely Marxist. Instead of criticizing the RoK from ignoring the rights of workers or participating in the global system of capitalism, they are instead focusing on the fact that the RoK has a female leader while simultaneously using language which marginalizes sex workers. I'm sure some quasi-Stalinists, PSL types and other so-called "Leftists" will be more than happy to try to deflect this though by trying to change the topic to the "bourgeois media" and whatnot - not that the bourgeois media doesn't deserve criticism, but not for the sake of defending such a truly worthless, exploitative, misogynistic, authoritarian and reactionary regime.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...geun-hye-obama
Socialist Party of Outer Space
To be honest I just think that they seize at whatever they fancy is a useful insult to hurl and don't rightly care about any other aspect of their raving. They latch at something like that and get at it.
Did they ever deride Dung-back for being in the Unification Church, that insane cult? Nah, I bet not... they do deals with the Unification cult after all, like that little auto-maker in Nampo.
The revolutionary despises public opinion. He despises and hates the existing social morality in all its manifestations. For him, morality is everything which contributes to the triumph of the revolution. Immoral and criminal is everything that stands in its way.
ex. Takayuki
I don't think you can deny a state's claim to Marxism or being a workers' republic on the basis that its media makes crazy sexist comments. It strikes me as idealism really.
pew pew pew
I also find it curious that a handful of people here defend a regime which uses language which would get them insta-banned on this forum. I think I've seen some of them also post on the anti-discrimination forum railing against this kind of language from Western Capitalists. Imagine if someone criticized a female poster for being a whore or comparing them to Japanese "comfort women". They would get banned so hard they wouldn't know what hit them. And they'd totally deserve the ban too. Of course we should be critical of bourgeois women, but not because they are women, and not by using language which marginalizes non-bourgeois women. We shouldn't call Hillary Clinton a "whore" we should call her a political adviser for a capitalist government which imposes free market reforms on the 3rd world.
I also wonder whether or not their accusations against Obama as a "pimp" also reflect some racist discourse, although I'm not so sure since the association of African Americans as "pimps" seems something which would not have the same kind of cultural resonance in Korea.
Yeah I think you're right - but that just shows the extent to which they are opportunists at heart. Some people here seem to be more oblivious to that fact than you are unfortunately, perhaps because they lack the willingness to critically analyze such regimes.
I don't think it's idealism to associate the political nature of a regime with the discourse it produces. The material conditions of the regime has a direct impact on the kind of discourse it utilizes, and a regime which utilizes Marxist politics and empowers actual working women (including sex workers) would not end up using such language. It is how we can explain why the political positions proclaimed in propaganda outlets like Pravda would differ from the political positions proclaimed by propaganda outlets like, say, Voice of America. Idealism would be the reverse kind of claim - that the discourse it uses leads to the kind of regime which it is.
Of course, individual Marxists might resort to reactionary discourse, and there is ample evidence of this (from Marx and Engels themselves even), but a regime which has been around for 60 years, which has progressed beyond the limited perspective of the 19th century, and which actually adopts critical positions leading to the empowerment of otherwise marginalized groups like women and sex workers, would presumably have abandoned such reactionary attitudes over time.
Last edited by Sinister Cultural Marxist; 27th April 2014 at 12:47.
Socialist Party of Outer Space
Yeah, that shit's fucked.
I don't think anybody on this board thinks it's acceptable to pull sexist shit like that.
Mind you, some of us don't think that means US-sable-rattling or mainstream media propaganda about the DPRK do anything to address misogyny.
The life we have conferred upon these objects confronts us as something hostile and alien.
Formerly Virgin Molotov Cocktail (11/10/2004 - 21/08/2013)