The Tigers were a military unit, not a political movement, they were armed and trained by the state, and they had no street-level presence. So I can't see how any sort of anti-fascist strategy could beat the Tigers - or the ZNG, etc. etc. - back.
What sort of "progressive persuasion" are you talking about? The thing is, I distinctly remember you talking about working with observers sent by social-democratic parties etc. Furthermore, you consistently praise liberals over Stalinists and have commented positively on election campaigns of bourgeois politicians.Originally Posted by Sasha
So why do you continue to post articles by the AWU, whose members cooperate with the Interior Ministry, and who consistently blame everything on "the Russians", including the events in Odessa, consistently shielding the Kiev government from blame? You can't have it both ways. If you want to condemn both sides, then actually condemn both sides, don't post propaganda from one side.Originally Posted by Sasha
So if conflict with the state "creates room for politicising", why do you not advocate that leftists participate in the anti-Maidan movement? The point is that this sort of love affair with anything that moves, or appears to be moving, is what's driving the left into obscurity, irrelevance and tailism. I refer you to the quote in my sig.Originally Posted by Sasha


