Thread: Marx and the British Government

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Join Date Sep 2010
    Location United States
    Posts 1,896
    Rep Power 16

    Default Marx and the British Government

    Why didn't the British expel Marx? Had he agreed not to attack Queen Victoria, or call for revolution in Britain?

    He attacked British policy in India, Ireland and the U.S. southern states; also attacked British capitalism, of course, child labor, etc. So why did the British let him stay? Bourgeois liberalism?
  2. #2
    Join Date Jul 2010
    Posts 2,471
    Rep Power 44

    Default

    Yep, liberalism. The British bourgeoisie have always been very confident of the passivity of the working class in this country. Marx also wasn't that involved in actively organizing British workers. He was more involved as an emigre in German and French matters. So he certainly kept a lower profile than he did on the continent. Possibly for that reason too they saw him as a destabilizing effect on the rival powers of europe.
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Manic Impressive For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Location Los Angeles
    Posts 334
    Organisation
    The Japjew Conspiracy
    Rep Power 15

    Default

    Funny thing about liberal democratic imperialism is that they often let people get away with dissent and will even allow those who want to violently overthrow the government to keep on talking.
    But once you reach their colonies, it's a damn police state.
  5. #4
    Join Date Jan 2013
    Posts 326
    Rep Power 10

    Default

    Why didn't the British expel Marx? Had he agreed not to attack Queen Victoria, or call for revolution in Britain?

    He attacked British policy in India, Ireland and the U.S. southern states; also attacked British capitalism, of course, child labor, etc. So why did the British let him stay? Bourgeois liberalism?
    So long as he didnt directly call for the overthrow of the crown there was nothing legally they could do IIRC. Also he only become known in his later years. The first mentions of Marx in the press I could find, beyond him writing letters to newspapers debating shit, are from the 1870s when some newspapers accuse him of being the conspiratorial mastermind behind planning the Paris Commune. If he had become massively known earlier in his life though I'm still unsure the British government would have expelled him though. Maybe they wouldn't know where to send him either, as he was, i assume, effectively stateless after the creation of the German Empire (unless he would have been automatically granted citizenship due to being Prussian?)
  6. #5
    Join Date Jun 2013
    Location Kingston Upon Hull
    Posts 407
    Rep Power 23

    Default

    afaik there are a few newspaper articles from the 1870's/80's on marxists.org and a few other sources i've read that seem to suggest that the British establishment eventually came to view Marx as a relatively harmless eccentric*?



    albeit a very well read one with potentially dangerous ideas.

Similar Threads

  1. British liberals versus Karl Marx; Marx wins by a TKO
    By jdhoch in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th April 2012, 04:08
  2. Damn that Communist British government!
    By IndependentCitizen in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12th October 2010, 14:59
  3. Is British government colluding in torture?
    By RSS News in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10th August 2009, 00:26
  4. British government will nationalize the banks!!
    By spice756 in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 9th October 2008, 05:50
  5. British Government suffers PFI defeat
    By Conghaileach in forum Newswire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th September 2002, 22:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread