Thread: "Why Socialism is on the Rise"

Results 1 to 7 of 7

  1. #1
    Join Date Jan 2014
    Location Alaska, United States
    Posts 42
    Organisation
    Green Party USA
    Rep Power 0

    Default "Why Socialism is on the Rise"

    So what is the moral case for capitalism? It lies in recognition that socialism isn't a great idea gone wrong -- it's an evil philosophy in action. It isn't driven by altruism; it's driven by greed and jealousy
    (apparently capitalism isn't).
    Socialism states that you owe me something simply because I exist. Capitalism, by contrast, results in a sort of reality-forced altruism: I may not want to help you, I may dislike you, but if I don't give you a product or service you want, I will starve. Voluntary exchange is more moral than forced redistribution.
    (as well as the opposite, in the case of the consumer, that is one the main fatal flaws in capitalism)
    Socialism violates at least three of the Ten Commandments: It turns government into God
    he was actually thinking of State Capitalism, which is what most "socialist" countries have or had
    it legalizes thievery and it elevates covetousness
    Wow, that's exactly what Corporatism/Capitalism is, complete opposite of socialism.
    Discussions of income inequality, after all, aren't about prosperity but about petty spite. Why should you care how much money I make, so long as you are happy?
    When someone is making billions by sitting on their ass smoking fat cigarettes while millions are starving then there's kind of a problem.
    Full Article: townhall(dot)com/columnists/benshapiro/2014/01/08/why-socialism-is-on-the-rise-n1773273/page/1
    Last edited by SovietCommie; 9th January 2014 at 20:02.
  2. #2
    Revolutionary Totalitarianism Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Apr 2010
    Posts 2,240
    Organisation
    The Sex Negative Conspiracy
    Rep Power 67

    Default

    I don't see why you should pay attention to anything posted on townhall. It's like the incoherent rages spewed by various imbeciles on The Blaze and similar. This sort of silly idiotic articles are the norm where one idiot tries to impress the other with a more nonsensical argument than the last. These sort of things are so ridiculous they do not warrant anyone's response-- not only is this fruitless, because they don't care, but wastes a lot of effort that could be wasted elsewhere: masturbating is a far better time-kill.
    The revolutionary despises public opinion. He despises and hates the existing social morality in all its manifestations. For him, morality is everything which contributes to the triumph of the revolution. Immoral and criminal is everything that stands in its way.

    ex. Takayuki
  3. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Sperm-Doll Setsuna For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date May 2013
    Posts 34
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Started reading the article

    Immediately stopped after NY mayor De Blasio was labelled "avowed socialist"
  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Niccolo For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date Jan 2014
    Posts 2
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Started reading the article

    Immediately stopped after NY mayor De Blasio was labelled "avowed socialist"
    I'm surprised that you and Commie even attempted to read anything from TH considering that it's known for its rehashed ultra-reactionary whining. Nothing deserving of acknowledgement comes out of that place, unless you're a masochist.
  7. The Following User Says Thank You to William Howard Taft For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date Jan 2014
    Location Alaska, United States
    Posts 42
    Organisation
    Green Party USA
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Started reading the article

    Immediately stopped after NY mayor De Blasio was labelled "avowed socialist"
    The author of that article is probably some Bill O' Reilly-worshiping right-winger who labels anything he doesn't like as "Commie! Socialist!". But it can be just annoying when leftists label anything they don't like as "Nazi, Fascist!".

    It's funny how that works, name-calling goes both ways.
  9. #6
    Join Date Aug 2013
    Location Missouri
    Posts 186
    Rep Power 6

    Default

    The author of that article is probably some Bill O' Reilly-worshiping right-winger who labels anything he doesn't like as "Commie! Socialist!". But it can be just annoying when leftists label anything they don't like as "Nazi, Fascist!".

    It's funny how that works, name-calling goes both ways.
    You're fitting everyone into broad categories that assumes everyone in that category says those terms...

    The irony is, something being Nazi / Fascist actually denotes some effect because there is apparent oppression. The surrogates of oppression don't exist in socialism and communism
  10. #7
    Join Date Jan 2014
    Location Alaska, United States
    Posts 42
    Organisation
    Green Party USA
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    You're fitting everyone into broad categories that assumes everyone in that category says those terms...

    The irony is, something being Nazi / Fascist actually denotes some effect because there is apparent oppression. The surrogates of oppression don't exist in socialism and communism
    The common definition of communism and socialism in the West is generally in reference to State Capitalism (USSR economy).

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 20th September 2012, 03:06
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27th June 2012, 05:03
  3. Interest in "communism" and "socialism" google search chart
    By Nothing Human Is Alien in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28th July 2011, 19:00
  4. Replies: 93
    Last Post: 15th October 2009, 18:46
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 7th June 2008, 17:26

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts