Both are capitalist, so why would I choose one?
inb4 Ismail
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Does anyone believe Stalin was better than Goulash communism?
Stalinism gives more emphasis on industry and does not pay attention to consumer goods. On the other hand Goulash communism (Hungarian communism) focuses on consumer goods. Take your pick what do you think is right ?
Both are capitalist, so why would I choose one?
inb4 Ismail
"We must flee from Time, we must create a life that is feminine and human - it is these imperative objectives that must guide us in this world heavy with catastrophes."
Jacques Camatte, Echos from the Past
"For example, to say that the relation between industrial capital and the class of the wage workers is expressed in precisely the same way in Belgium and Thailand, and that the praxis of their respective struggles should be established without taking into account in either of the two cases the factors of race or nationality, does not mean you are an extremist, but it means in effect that you have understood nothing of Marxism."
Amadeo Bordiga, Factors of Race and Nation in the Marxist Analysis
Stalin!!!
Both are embarrassments to the leftist movement.
No gods, no masters
Don't get me started on people confusing the word "Stalinism".
But according to what you have to say about both of them...meh, no strong feelings either way, surely you can have industry that produces "nicer" things.
Didn't Hungary fuel their production of consumer goods through loans? I know that Romania did so. It just wasn't sustainable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Formerly soso17
