Results 1 to 20 of 108
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24403791
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-13561646
He was a crafty military commander who consistently prevailed against difficult odds, in a day when 3rd world countries in Asia were finally gaining real independence from Europe. Apparently he also became a bit of a green after the war, criticizing massive bauxite mining plans. He's an interesting figure from a historical perspective, whatever is thought of the Vietnamese national struggle (or what it ended up becoming).
Socialist Party of Outer Space
Anywhere you can find his work "People's war, People's Army" for free
Men vanish from earth leaving behind them the furrows they have ploughed. I see the furrow Lenin left sown with the unshatterable seed of a new life for mankind, and cast deep below the rolling tides of storm and lightning, mighty crops for the ages to reap.
~Helen Keller
To despise the enemy strategically is an elementary requirement for a revolutionary. Without the courage to despise the enemy and without daring to win, it will be simply impossible to make revolution and wage a people’s war, let alone to achieve victory. ~Lin Biao
http://commiforum.forumotion.com/
What were his relations with the Vietnamese government after Ho died? I know he was highly respected by the government, but I heard that he didn't like it's too pro-Soviet line and the market reforms. But anyways, he was one of the greatest revolutionaries in history.
This is in reference merely to the first phase of the Tet Offensive. 9k anti-communist dead, 15k communist dead, and the anti-communist forces, primarily the ARVN and the Americans, outnumbered the communists 3 to 1. By the time the offensive wrapped up at the end of 1968, the ARVN and the Americans had 45,000 KIA, the communists had 44,000 KIA.
Yeah right, NLF and the VPA suffered less casualties than the ARVN during the second phase of the Indochina War.
Concerning his modern politics, the entry on his death in The New York Times notes the following:
"He was regarded as an elder statesman whose hard-line views had softened with the cessation of the war that unified Vietnam. He supported economic reform and closer relations with the United States while publicly warning of the spread of Chinese influence and the environmental costs of industrialization.
[....]
In his final years, General Giap was an avuncular host to foreign visitors to his villa in Hanoi, where he read extensively in Western literature, enjoyed Beethoven and Liszt and became a convert to pursuing socialism through free-market reforms.
'In the past, our greatest challenge was the invasion of our nation by foreigners,' he told an interviewer. 'Now that Vietnam is independent and united, we can address our biggest challenge. That challenge is poverty and economic backwardness.'
Addressing that challenge had long been deferred, he told the journalist Neil Sheehan in 1989. 'Our country is like an ill person who has suffered for a long time,' he said. 'The countries around us made a lot of progress. We were at war.'"
So basically the same rationale given by the Vietnamese, Chinese and Laotian leaderships: controlled markets supposedly develop the productive forces faster, ergo they should be supported for the time-being.
* h0m0revolutionary: "neo-liberalism can deliver healthy children, it can educate them, it can feed them, it can clothe them and leave them fully contented."
* rooster: "Supporting [anti-imperialism] is reactionary. How is any nation supposed to stand up [to] the might of the US anyway?"
* nizan: "Fuck your education is empowerment bullshit, education is alienation, nothing more. You indulge in a dying prestige for a role in a bureaucratic spectacle deserving of nothing beyond contempt."
* Alexios: "To the Board Administration: Ismail [...] needs to be eliminated from this forum."
This ruined my day. I have nothing but respect for general Giap.
Say what you like about Vietnam and the path it took after liberation, that guy was on the right side of a bad war.
History will view him as the effective military strategist he was; his environmental, political, and economic concerns will be less relevant, since he was the driving force behind Vietnamese national liberation, which succeeded.
Ideology will be blind as to what there is to learn from him, specifically militarily.
When a tankie dies you will no doubt be the first to comment on a thread atributed to him, claiming he was actually a bourgeois counter-revolutionary who didn't lick Hoxha's arse.
Seriously, Ismail, give it a rest. I'm no great fan of Giap's politics either but I'm not sure what this adds to the discussion.
Erm, Vietnam was literally the only self-proclaimed socialist country that enjoyed friendly ties with Albania (in part because the Vietnamese continued to praise Stalin and publish his works at least as late as 1989.) When Hoxha died the Vietnamese declared two days of national mourning in which the country's flag was flown half-mast.
Sinister Cultural Marxist and MarxEngelsLeninStalinMao were speculating about Giap's ideology after the 70's, so I answered them.
* h0m0revolutionary: "neo-liberalism can deliver healthy children, it can educate them, it can feed them, it can clothe them and leave them fully contented."
* rooster: "Supporting [anti-imperialism] is reactionary. How is any nation supposed to stand up [to] the might of the US anyway?"
* nizan: "Fuck your education is empowerment bullshit, education is alienation, nothing more. You indulge in a dying prestige for a role in a bureaucratic spectacle deserving of nothing beyond contempt."
* Alexios: "To the Board Administration: Ismail [...] needs to be eliminated from this forum."
Yeah I didn't actually see Ismail attackingGiap here.
Anyway it's good that this got some coverage in at least the British media but I haven't seen much of it at all in the American press
RIP general Giap one of greatest revolutionary anti imperialist figures ever
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Leonid Brezhnev----The defeat of Nazi Germany signified the victory of progress over reaction, humanity over barbarism and the victory of socialism over imperialist obscurantism. This victory opened the road for advancing the revolutionary struggle of the working class, a national liberation movement on an unprecedented scale and the destruction of the shameful colonial system.
I wasn't speculating about his ideology, just commenting on the fact that after the war he became involved in environmental issues, particularly against the exploitation by large Chinese Capital of Bauxite deposits in the mountains of Vietnam. Also on the fact that he did criticize the Vietnamese party, even if he didn't really understand the fact that it was Vietnam's neoliberalism that was opening it up to those problems in the first place.
I don't know if real ideological precision should be expected from military leaders. He wasn't an economist, he was someone who knew how to organize peasants into an army and command it.
Why? The dude lived to 102 after living a life fighting two of the three most powerful Capitalist nations of the Cold War. He lived a pretty long, rich life in the end, no?Originally Posted by Paul Pott
Socialist Party of Outer Space
He's the embodiment of all the things all collegian Trotskyites say they want to be: an actual hard-boiled revolutionary. And he repelled two capitalist powers and one super power. And won. All three times. And lived. All three times. And he even survived to 102. 100-fucking-2. Most Americans are going to croak in their sixties they say.
Regardless of how you feel about communism, the man deserves every ounce of your respect.
I've seen some coverage of him. What's surprising is that, despite the fact he was a socialist, the media's been surprisingly respectful. Though I fear turning FOX News who are probably throwing a small party. Or at least a few high fives.
I apologise.
Personally I won't be shedding any tears over the death of a general in a capitalist army.
Devrim
All genuine anti-imperialists should mourn the passing of General Giap.
R.I.P.
For the glory of socialism & love!
What a revolting thing to say.
The imperialists torture a poor country trying to liberate itself from colonial subjugation, and this is your attitude to a man who led that resistance?
Despicable.
"Machinery in itself is a victory of man over the forces of nature, but in the hands of capital it makes man the slave of those forces" - Uncle Karl
One gang of capitalists and imperialists, backed by foreign capitalists and imperialists, was replaced by another gang of capitalists and imperialists, backed by foreign capitalists and imperialists. What's the difference?
Critique of the Gotha Programme, Pt IV: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch04.htm
No War but the Class War
Destroy All Nations
Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC): "A man whose life has been dishonorable is not entitled to escape disgrace in death."