'Anti-Racism is a codeword for Anti-White'

[Tim Cornelis]

I'm looking for more arguments, anecdotes, statistics, etc. to blow the 'Anti-Racism is a codeword for Anti-White' mantra away. This is what I have so far.


Work in Progress
I realise arguing with folk whom toy the line of 'Anti-Racism is a codeword for Anti-White' is a useless exercise but the sheer idiocy of these comments being spammed around the internet invokes me to reply each time. So I will use this blog for future reference to simply copy and paste utter refutation of these ridiculous assertions. All are invited to join.
--------------------------
1. The Claim: 'Anti-Racism is a codeword for Anti-White'
White nationalists have spawned a campaign of spamming the Internet with various generic messages attempting to provoke 'whites' (henceforth Europeans) into (re-)considering the notion that Europeans are, through a complex process of social engineering by an external force, are being threatened with extinction and extermination, and, subsequently, the need to adopt white nationalism to preserve the European racial category. The generic message follows lines similar to these:
'Anti-racism is a codeword for anti-white; Africa for Africa, Asia for Asia, Europe for Everyone; Mass Immigration and Multiculturalism are stimulated in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries'. White nationalists tend to believe there is a conspiracy by International Jewry in the form of highly clandestine, complex, and insidious social engineering whereby public policy in white countries is designed in such a matter as to promote the advancement of non-European ethnicities and racial groups beyond their European counterparts, and for Europeans to become a minority in their own country, until they are assimilated completely and have their racial purity diluted. Jews, of course, are monolithic in this way because they have an apparent genetic predisposition to hate people of European descent.
Note that this conspiracy only concerns Ashkenazim or Askhenazi Jews; Pakistani, Indian, or Ethiopian Jews are not blamed by white nationalists.
In this discussion we will include in 'white country' Canada, the United States, and all European countries (except Turkey and Russia).
There are four general claims why a 'white genocide' is supposedly being committed:

• Mass immigration and multiculturalism are promoted only in white countries and all white countries
• Diversity and interracial marriage is celebrated and propaganised only in white countries
• Government policies stimulate integration and assimilation only in white countries
• Birth rates are kept too low (by some external force, the Jews of course) for white populations to be sustainable

This assumption rests entirely on a strawman as no antiracist, or at least not in quantities sufficient to be considered representative, have ever uttered such words. If asked to provide any evidence of such sentiment being expressed by non-racists, anti-racists, liberals, socialists, and so forth, the white nationalists dig themselves deeper into a bizarre, delusional, paranoid conspiracy worldview: allof them are really lying. They may say one thing, but practice reveals another, since, supposedly, only white countries are subject to assimilation, multiculturalism, and mass immigration (as if Western liberals or anti-racists have the power to affect public policy concerning migrant workers' rights in GCC-countries).
In fact, anti-racists are at the forefront of opposing the Jewish state and Zionism, and denounce it as racist and an apartheidsregime (which is not accurate incidentally). Moreover, it is a false equivalence as the Jewish identity is not one racial category, whereas 'white' is. Similarly, "Mexico is for Mexicans" is nonsensical as the 'Mexican' demonym is not a racial category either. A Mexican is a citizen or resident of Mexico and can belong to any ethnic or racial group, thus saying "Mexico is for Mexicans" is self-evident. Mexico is already melting pot of diversity, with a majority of mixed race people, and a considerable minority of Amerindians, Europeans, Arab Mexicans, and Afro-Mexicans. Israel, likewise, is a melting pot of diversity. That Arabia is for "Muslim people" is also rather stupid since it's not a racial category and 10-20% of Egyptians is Christian, 40% of Lebanon is Christian, 12% of Syria is Christian, and between 10-20% of the Gulf state's population is non-Muslim.

That the white race is a social construct but other races aren't makes no sense, of course. No anti-racist will ever uphold such a view. White nationalists charge anti-racists with an array of other strawmen as well. Including that we supposedly blame whites for all evils in the world. Of course it's easy to maintain a deluded world view such as that of white nationalism when fabricating information to suit it can be done with no realisation of loss of intellectual integrity.

The reason that this is purely an internet phenomenon and is not taken up by academic circles is not because academics is an extension of Jewish control, but rather that it's a fallacy-ridden hypothesis.

• Part of it is unfalsifiable because it advances the notion that while no textual or spoken evidence of any kind can be produced for anti-racists saying such and such, in reality they are all lying. In other words, irrespective of what anti-racists may say, we are always right and there is no way to disprove it.
• Part of it relies on unquantifiable notions and thus incomparable, such as the extent to which something is "propagandised".
• Part of it is based on misrepresentations of the opponent's position, strawmen, (such as the belief that anti-racists advocate for less or no migration controls exclusively for European or white borders).
• Part of it relies on a false equivalence, such as comparing religion and race (Jews and whites) or nationality and race (Mexicans and whites).
• Part of it is a non-sequitur: it does not follow from, if we establish that, white countries are comparatively more advanced in racial and ethnic co-existence, that therefore there is an insidious campaign of social engineering designed (by Jews or Ashkenazim) to commit clandestine genocide against the white race. It could be that white countries are just anomalous in that regard without its cause having to be an implausible conspiracy.

Based on this alone we can discard the hypothesis, but we will succeed in burying it even deeper than it has dug itself by looking at Israel and its ethnic and racial makeup.

2. Multiculturalism in Israel & Jews in the USA
The most multiracial, multi-ethnic, and multicultural country amongst white countries is the United States with the largest racial group, Euro-Americans ('whites'), making up circa 60% of the population. The amount of power ascribed to International Zionism by white nationalists is incredible. The Zionists exert near absolute control over the entire world, they possess cultural hegemony promoting progressive values (LGBT rights, pro-migration sentiment, interracial marriage -- see Frankfurt School Conspiracy Theory), they possess mediums through which to transmit this type of propaganda: they control newspapers, TV shows, Hollywood, and even the porn industry where they produce interracial pornography. The Zionists' social manipulation extents so far that they have even managed to decrease birthrates in white countries to accelerate their demise. They have the power to manipulate social sentiment to the extent the 'white people' come to accept norms and policies that are, in reality, their own genocide!
The Zionists and Jews, while a minuscule minority in white countries, control politics and public policy of these white countries, as well as finance. Yet, despite this absurd amount of power and influence the Ashkenazim are said to have, which they supposedly wield over alien countries and the entire world in which they are a minuscule minority, they cannot even keep their own tiny country free of foreign influence or from being more multi-ethnic, racial, and cultural than the white countries they seek to destroy through exactly those means! The Ashkenazim possess the means and tools for the grandest project of social engineering ever manipulating social sentiment to the extent that the target group becomes to accept their own extermination, and yet these Ashkenazim have failed to keep their own country free of non-Jews and foreign elements.
This contradiction is beyond ludicrous, and one would have to conclude that those upholding it, the white nationalists, suffer from an insane delusion.
The demographic makeup of Israel, in 2004, was "Jewish 76.4% (of which Israel-born 67.1%, Europe/America-born 22.6%, Africa-born 5.9%, Asia-born 4.2%), non-Jewish 23.6% (mostly Arab)" (source: indexmundi).
Within 76.4% of the Jewish population we have further ethnic diversity, Sephardi Jews (Iberia), Askhenazi Jews (Central Europe), Beta Israel (East Africa), Mizrahi Jews (Middle East), and Bukharan Jews (Central Asia). The fact that racism and prejudice between Jews was very common and still is relatively common shows that the white nationalists' attempt to brush them with the same racial brush is inadequate. Racism was primarily though not exclusively unilateral with many Askhenzim considering Sephardim and Mizrahim to be as "backward" as the Arabs whose countries they once inhabited.
Roughly 50% of the Jewish population is Sephardi and Mizrahi, and about 45% is Ashkenazim. The racial and ethnic makeup of Israel is as follows:
1. Askhenazi Jews: 38%
2. Arabs: 20%
3. Sephardi Jews: 18%
4. Mizrahi Jews: 18%
5. Africans and Beta Israel: 3%
6. Other: 3% (Bedouin, Druze).
The largest ethnic or racial group in Israel does not even represent half of the population, or even half of the Jewish population. In other words, Israel is far more ethnically and racially diverse than the most diverse amongst white countries: the United States. Arguing that Zionists are pursuing a racial war to preserve Jewish supremacy by committing genocide against Europeans through massive social engineering on the one hand, and at the same time allowing its very own Zionist state to be more ethnically, racially, and culturally diverse than every white country is unimaginably delusional.

Moreover, the percentage of Jews in Israel is dropping: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._of_Israel.png

Intermarriage between different Jewish ethnicities is increasing.

Intermarriage of all these regathered Jewish ethnic groups was initially uncommon, due in part to distances of each group's settlement in Israel, and cultural and/or "racial" biases. In recent generations, however, the barriers were lowered by state sponsored assimilation of all the Jewish ethnic groups into a common Sabra (native-born Israeli) identity which facilitated extensive "mixed-marriages".

The cultural differences between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews impacted the degree and rate of assimilation into Israeli society, and sometimes the divide between Eastern European and Middle Eastern Jews was quite sharp. Segregation, especially in the area of housing, limited integration possibilities over the years.[153] Intermarriage between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim is increasingly common in Israel, and by the late 1990s 28% of all Israeli children had multi-ethnic parents (up from 14% in the 1950s).[154] A 1983 research found that children of inter-ethnic marriages in Israel enjoyed improved socio-economic status.[155]

According to a study published in the U.S. two years ago, 6 percent of black people who married, married a white person, as opposed to 10 percent in Israel.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition...arriage-1.4115

In Israel, which has no civil marriage, these marriages are recognised if they are arranged outside of Israel. Currently, five percent of Israeli Jews are married outside their faith.

This stands in contrast with Israel where intermarriage is practically non-existent, at five%.
http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Je...couldnt-346909

In the United States, Jews intermarry at rapid rates as mentioned in article titled 'Pew survey of U.S. Jews: soaring intermarriage, assimilation rates':

The proportion of Jews who say they have no religion and are Jewish only on the basis of ancestry, ethnicity or culture is growing rapidly, and two-thirds of them are not raising their children Jewish at all.

Overall, the intermarriage rate is at 58 percent, up from 43 percent in 1990 and 17 percent in 1970. Among non-Orthodox Jews, the intermarriage rate is 71 percent.

http://www.jta.org/2013/10/01/news-o...#ixzz2hRyVxkla

Additionally, birth rates amongst American Jews is too low to sustain it:

The 1990 NJPS also discovered a birth rate of 1.8 children per America Jewish couple. The obvious significance of that number is that it is not enough to replace current Jewish population.

http://www.jewishgentilecouples.com/...marriagetrends

There's also considerable campaigning by secular Jewish organisations to allow for civil marriages which would enable people of different faiths to marry. 83% of Israelis support civil marriage (source).

In 2010 an Israeli court ruled that segregation by Ashkenazim against Sephardim and Mizrahim in education is illegal under Israeli law. In other words, the government "forces" assimilation of various racial groups.

Celebrating diversity between what appear to be Mizrahi (L), Beta Israel (C), and Ashkenazi (R) Jews




The woman of African descent pictured became Miss Israel 2013. .


More celebrations of racial and ethnic diversity in Israel.

The government actively seeks to integrate and assimilate its citizens through civil means, but also uses the military to achieve the same:

The following analysis takes a comprehensive look at the historical and contemporary role and influence that the Israel Defense Forces has had in Israeli society, and highlights the benefits of the IDF as a “people’s army”-one which serves as a melting pot and strives to fit the needs of Israel’s ethnically, culturally, religiously, and socio-economically diverse array of citizens ... The leading assumption is that by integration into the IDF, assimilation into Israeli society is easier.
http://www.idfblog.com/reports/in-de...ciety-in-2010/

Inclusive military IDF-propaganda celebrating diversity, check this link for more "politically correct feel-good" propaganda: http://www.idfblog.com/2012/04/01/3-inspi/

This photo was captioned with "Ibrahim, the Bedouin soldier ..."

Israel has the exact same symptoms of alleged genocidal social engineering as any median white country. It has mass immigration, it has government-sponsored assimilation, it has 'promotion' of inter-ethnic and interracial marriage (though not yet interfaith marriage), and it has celebration of ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity. If a genocide is being committed against Europeans then, by the same standard, a genocide is being committed against Askhenazi Jews -- the very people supposedly responsible for the genocide against Europeans.

"No Racism" in Hebrew, 'Anti-racism is codeword for Anti-Semitism' apparently

In 2003 Benjamin Netanyahu opined that if the percentage of Arab citizens of Israel rises above its current level of about 20 percent, Israel would not be able to retain a Jewish demographic majority, the basis of Israel's self-definition as a "Jewish democratic state". Netanyahu's comments were criticized as racist by Arab Knesset members and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel

Recently, since the mid 2000s, African migrants have found their way to Israel in increasing numbers. Tens of thousands of African undocumented migrants entered Israel. Almost doubling from circa 25,000 in 2010 to 55,000 in 2012. Israel is not allowed to deport these migrants because of their UN status as refugees (which is weird considering white nationalists ascribe to Zionism near absolute power over the world). Despite widespread racial prejudice in Israel, African migrants enjoy some support amongst Israeli citizens as evidenced by this video:

[spoil]

+ YouTube Video

[/spoiler]

The racism of football clubs like Beitar Jerusalem F.C. has also been prominently featured in Western media. (1) (2) and is presently being challenged by the football club's owners.
Isn't it likewise peculiar that, for example, in the Netherlands the tightest immigration law since World War II was passed by a leftist jew, Job Cohen, and that anti-immigration and anti-Islam party, the PVV (Freedom Party lead by Geert Wilders), is fiercely pro-Zionist?

Additionally, I refer the reader to this post on website detailing and championing ethnic diversity in Israel:
http://israelseen.com/2012/05/29/isr...t-of-cultures/

The example of Israel is more than sufficient refutation of the in itself fallacy-ridden hypothesis. But we can destroy it even further.

3. All White Countries?

White nationalists claim all white countries are subject to 'multiculturalisation', but, as we will see, many countries in Europe, especially Eastern Europe, remain ethnically and/or culturally homogeneous. To argue that there is some implausible conspiracy by International Jewry to destroy all white countries on the basis that it is suspicious that only and all white countries are subject to 'multiculturalisation' is, therefore, less than not solid.

I attempt to follow the same arbitrary ethnic and racial categories of white nationalists.
The racial category is white/European, and within this racial category we can distinguish five ethnicities: Romanic, Germanic, Slavic, Ural, Baltic. Any country with over 95% of its people belonging to the same racial category will be considered racially homogeneous.

Ukraine
Ukraine is almost entirely European.
Ukrainian 77.8%, Russian 17.3%, Belarusian 0.6%, Moldovan 0.5%, Crimean Tatar 0.5%, Bulgarian 0.4%, Hungarian 0.3%, Romanian 0.3%, Polish 0.3%, Jewish 0.2%, other 1.8% (2001 census) (source: indexmundi)
Slavic: 96.9%
Romanic: 0.8%
Ural: 0.3% (Hungarians)
Europeans ('whites'): 98%
Ashkenazi Jews: 0.2%
Other: 1.8%

Belarus
Belarusian 83.7%, Russian 8.3%, Polish 3.1%, Ukrainian 1.7%, other 3.2% (2009 census) (source: indexmundi).

Serbia
Serb 82.9%, Hungarian 3.9%, Romany (Gypsy) 1.4%, Yugoslavs 1.1%, Bosniaks 1.8%, Montenegrin 0.9%, other 8% (2002 census) (source: indexmundi)

Slovenia
Slovene 83.1%, Serb 2%, Croat 1.8%, Bosniak 1.1%, other or unspecified 12% (2002 census) (source: indexmundi)

Bosnia
Bosniak 48%, Serb 37.1%, Croat 14.3%, other 0.6% (2000)

Albania
Albanian 95%, Greek 3%, other 2% (Vlach, Roma (Gypsy), Serb, Macedonian, Bulgarian) (1989 est.) (source: indexmundi)
Perhaps Albanians are not regarded as 'white' on some arbitrary basis by white nationalists. It also makes me wonder how do International Jewry define 'white people' and why would they so arbitrarily want to kill them?

Poland
Polish 96.7%, German 0.4%, Belarusian 0.1%, Ukrainian 0.1%, other and unspecified 2.7% (2002 census) (source: indexmundi)
Slavic: ca. 97%
Germanic: ca. 0.5%
Europeans ('whites'): at least 97.5%

Poland has 4,500 African citizens, and a population of 38,000,000 (=0.01%). Burundi has 3,000 European (white) citizens, and a population of 8,000,000 (=0.03%). And Kenya has 60,000 white people and a population of 43,000,000 (=0.14%).

Finland
Finn 93.4%, Swede 5.6%, Russian 0.5%, Estonian 0.3%, Roma (Gypsy) 0.1%, Sami 0.1% (2006)
Ural: 93.8%
Germanic: 6.1%
Slavic: 0.5%

Hungary
Hungarian 92.3%, Roma 1.9%, other or unknown 5.8% (2001 census) (indexmundi)

Ireland
Irish 87.4%, other white 7.5%, Asian 1.3%, black 1.1%, mixed 1.1%, unspecified 1.6% (2006 census)
'White': 94.9%
non-'white': 3.5%

Slovakia
Slovak 85.8%, Hungarian 9.7%, Roma 1.7%, Ruthenian/Ukrainian 1%, other and unspecified 1.8% (2001 census)

Spain
88% European
12% non-European
While not racially homogeneous it is still more racially homogeneous than a poor country like Jordan.

Romania
Romanian (official) 91%, Hungarian 6.7%, Romany (Gypsy) 1.1%, other 1.2% (indexmundi)

Estonia
Estonian 68.7%, Russian 25.6%, Ukrainian 2.1%, Belarusian 1.2%, Finn 0.8%, other 1.6% (2008 census) (source: indexmundi)
European ('whites'): 98.4% at the very least

Latvia
Latvian 59.3%, Russian 27.8%, Belarusian 3.6%, Ukrainian 2.5%, Polish 2.4%, Lithuanian 1.3%, other 3.1% (2009)
(source: indexmundi)
European ('whites'): at the very least 95.9%

Argentina and Chile
Most of the inhabitants and citizens of Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile are of Italian, German, and Spanish descent with little race mixing with Amerindian population. These may thus be considered white countries. And despite being relatively well developed, they have retained their ethnic homogeneity. This suggests that the fortunate proximity of third world countries as well as colonial and historical ties explain why Western Europe and the United States have developed such a multi-racial and multicultural society.

Denmark
It is frequently asserted by white nationalists that white countries are not allowed to restrict immigration, it is forced on them (ignoring that migration control relies on coercion, and initiation of force, whereas open borders is the absence of force). In 2007 the Danish people elected a rightist coalition to power, a coalition which made immigration into Denmark virtually impossible. In 2011 the Danish people voted a leftist coalition into power.
White countries are allowed to close their borders, it's that most Europeans vote for parties that don't want to.

Andorra, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, San Marino
These small nations are racially homogeneous.

Serbia
Serb 82.9%, Hungarian 3.9%, Romany (Gypsy) 1.4%, Yugoslavs 1.1%, Bosniaks 1.8%, Montenegrin 0.9%, other 8% (2002 census) (source: indexmundi)

Austria
Austrians 91.1%, former Yugoslavs 4% (includes Croatians, Slovenes, Serbs, and Bosniaks), Turks 1.6%, German 0.9%, other or unspecified 2.4% (2001 census) (indexmundi)

Switzerland
German (official) 63.7%, French (official) 20.4%, Italian (official) 6.5%, Serbo-Croatian 1.5%, Albanian 1.3%, Portuguese 1.2%, Spanish 1.1%, English 1%, Romansch (official) 0.5%, other 2.8% (2000 census)
About 7% are foreign nationals, but many of them are of European descent.

Croatia
Croat 89.6%, Serb 4.5%, other 5.9% (including Bosniak, Hungarian, Slovene, Czech, and Roma) (2001 census) (indexmundi)

Moldova
Moldovan/Romanian 78.2%, Ukrainian 8.4%, Russian 5.8%, Gagauz 4.4%, Bulgarian 1.9%, other 1.3% (2004 census) (indexmundi)

Conclusion
Out of circa 51 white countries (44 European, 2 Austronesian, 2 North American, 3 Latin American), 26 are racially homogeneous (51% of white countries is racially homogeneous). Discounting the four small nations, there are 46 white countries, of which 21 are racially homogeneous (46% of white countries is racially homogeneous).
If we compare this to Arabic countries we find that there are 19 Arabic countries of which 7 are racially homogeneous (36% of Arabic countries is racially homogeneous).
12 racially heterogeneous Arabic countries: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iraq, Lebanon, Mauritania
7 racially homogeneous Arabic countries: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Yemen, Tunisia, Libya, Palestine

4. Only White Countries?

Given the arbitrary racial classification (see map 1 and explanation below), it is difficult to compile an accurate list of racial diversity. African countries tend to be the most ethnically diverse, while European countries tend to be the most ethnic homogeneity (see map 2 and explanation below). However, these various ethnicity within African countries can be said to belong to the arbitrary "black race." But this poses a problem, if we have three races, Asian, African, European, where do, say, Arabs or Indians fit?

Ethnic diversity
If we look at ethnic diversity we see that white countries tend to score much lower than non-white countries. Following the logic of white nationalists, most ethnicities in Africa are victim of an ongoing genocide. They may retort that they are of the same race but then the Rwandan genocide was not genocide because they were all African. An ethnic group can be a victim of genocide as much as a racial group. This would also, incidentally, mean that there is a genocide against Dutch Americans because Dutch Americans were assimilated and 'interbred' with, say, Italian Americans, or German Americans, and thus the Dutch ethnicity was a victim of genocide.
If multiracial co-existence is in actual reality genocide, why wouldn't the same apply to ethnicities? It would logically follow from those premises. I invite you to look at this map of ethnic diversity by country (ignoring the race factor):

.

There is no reason logical reason to not apply the white nationalists' logic to ethnicities as they too can be victims of genocide, it need not be limited to racial groups. However, I will try to focus on racial groups to remain within the same (arbitrary) paramteters of the white nationalists. From this arises some difficulty as so far race is not a taxonomic unit based on diverging genetic patterns, that is to say, it's not scientific. It's solely based on phenotypic appearance (which can be deceiving) and linear heritage.

Arabs, based on these arbitrary definitions, are not the same race as Indians or Pakistanis (referring here to Indo-Aryans). Austronesians -- Javanese, Madagascan, etc. -- are not the same race as Polynesians or Mongoloids (East Asians).

Qatar
Arab 40%, Indian 18%, Pakistani 18%, Iranian 10%, other 14% (source: indexmundi)

United Arab Emirates
Outdated information from 1982:
Emirati 19%, other Arab and Iranian 23%, South Asian 50%, other expatriates (includes Westerners and East Asians) 8% (source: indexmundi)

Saudi Arabia
About 10% of the population is of Afro-Arab descent. Presently (2013), 2,500,000 Indians preside in Saudi Arabia, as well as hundreds of thousands of South Asians and South-East Asians. In 2000, 1,500,000 (or 7%) of Saudi Arabia's population was from India. There were also circa 900,000 Pakistanis, 450,000 Filipinos, 700,000 Bangladeshi, 100,000 Sri Lankas, and 300,000 Indonesians. (source: http://moia.gov.in/pdf/Saudi%20Arabia.pdf)

Oman
About 30% of the population is foreign, mainly South Asian and South-East Asian migrant workers.

Bahrain
Bahraini 46%, non-Bahraini 54% (2010 census) (source: indexmundi)

GCC-countries
The above GCC-countries may have gone through a period of massive immigration, with most residents in the majority of the GCC-members being non-Arab, the recognition of their rights is scarce. White nationalists will claim that this shows that only countries with a Eurodescendant-majority are forced to apply civil rights to ethnic minorities because only Europeans are subject to extermination. This argument, it would seem, is reduced to "GCC-regimes have the right to be highly exploitative, oppressive toward anyone unlike them, and Europeans don't! This means genocide is committed against Europeans!" A massive non-sequitur. But consider this, the period between the first African slaves arriving in the United States and the attainment of civil rights spanned hundreds of years. This, with an Enlightenment government. The GCC-countries are not modernised, and are backward, and, moreover, are virgins in cultural and ethnic homogeneity. It is not unlikely that acceptance of heterogeneity will grow overtime, especially if popular revolts replace the autocratic and backward regimes with more modernised forms of government.
It is also noteworthy that a delegation of members of the international trade union federation (ETUC???) went to Qatar to promote more rights for migrant workers, many of them European. In other words, through workers' struggles they are promoting multiculturalism in at least one GCC-country.
White nationalists will claim that these migrant workers are second class citizens and that, for this reason, GCC-countries do not count because there is no "forced assimilation" as there is in white countries (or at least 58% of white countries), but pay careful attention to the reasoning behind this: they admit that mass immigration into GCC-countries is far more massive but since these backward regimes have the right to vilely exploit and oppress migrant workers it does not count, or conversely, that since white countries are not allowed to vilely exploit and oppress racial and ethnic minorities as GCC-countries do, or in other words, white people are not allowed to be assholes, it in fact constitutes a genocide against white people!

Genetic studies have found significant African female-mediated gene flow in Arab communities in the Arabian Peninsula and neighboring countries, with an average of 38% of African maternal lineages in Yemen,[127][128] 16% in Oman-Qatar,[128] and 10% in Saudi Arabia-United Arab Emirates.[128] Although distinctive and self-identified black communities have been reported in countries such as Iraq with a reported 1.2 million black people,[129] in the Arabian Peninsula and neighboring countries, most of those of identifiable African descent are classified and identify as Arab, not black.[130]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_...bian_Peninsula

Lebanon
Arab 95%, Armenian 4%, other 1%
note: many Christian Lebanese do not identify themselves as Arab but rather as descendents of the ancient Canaanites and prefer to be called Phoenicians (source: indexmundi)
125,000 Indians, 70,000 Afghans, 30,000 Pakistanis, 20,000 Russians, 20,000 Bangladeshi, 20,000 Bulgarians. 285,000 different ethnic and racial foreigners in Lebanon. Which is 7% of the population (source: http://migrationsmap.net/). Additionally, a considerable amount of Kurdish refugees from Turkey preside in Lebanon, some 200,000.
Ethnoreligious diversity in the Levant:

advocates of genocide in Lebanon, apparently.

Lebanon has many advocacy groups (of genocide, apparently) for migrants, migrant workers, and anti-racism, these include:

• The Anti-Racism movement (facebook)
• Migrant Community Center
• NARI (Group of Nepalese Feminists in Lebanon)

Demonstration against sponsorship system in Beirut

Syria
Arab 90.3%, Kurds, Armenians, and other 9.7% (source: indexmundi)

Iran
Persian 61%, Azeri 16%, Kurd 10%, Lur 6%, Baloch 2%, Arab 2%, Turkmen and Turkic tribes 2%, other 1% (source: indexmundi)
Iran reserves one seat for the ethnoreligious Armenian Christian community as well as two seats for Jewish members, and seats for various other religious and ethnic communities.
Additionally, Iran hosts 1,858,527 Afghans, presumably refugees (source: migrationsmap.net).

Iraq
Arab 75%-80%, Kurdish 15%-20%, Turkoman, Assyrian, or other 5% (source: indexmundi)
An Al Jazeera report stated that there are one million Afro-Iraqis, though the government does not recognise them as minority, nor does it keep statistics of such kind so it's not possible to provide accurate and precise statistics. The phenotypic appearance of Afro-Iraqis also suggests hundreds of years of biracial relationships.

+ YouTube Video

In Iraq, minorities are accorded a fixed number of seats. Afro-Iraqis, such as the Movement of Free Iraqis, are demanding the same right.

Malaysia
Malay 50.4%, Chinese 23.7%, indigenous 11%, Indian 7.1%, others 7.8% (2004 est.) (source: indexmundi)

Interracial marriage, especially between Chinese and Indians, is on the rise. People of such mixed descent are informally called Chindians. White nationalists claim interracial marriage is promoted only to Europeans, but I have yet to see such explicit positive descriptions of interracial marriage as this:

LOVE is blind and marriages are made in heaven. In a multiracial country like Malaysia where people of different races live, learn and work together, it is inevitable for them to fall in love and marry someone from a different ethnic group.

Though initially, they face numerous problems from their families for wanting to marry someone from a different race and culture, they have blended well, overcame obstacles and today are living testimony of interracial and cultural bonding.

The trend of Indians marrying Chinese and vice versa has become quite common and the union has led to the emergence of a Chinese-Indian, or termed as Chindians, who have sharp facial features and fair complexion.

The Chindian family has the best of both worlds; enjoying food, culture, festivals and music from the two races.

http://www.nst.com.my/

Mixed race models are being promoted in Malaysia: http://www.intermix.org.uk/news/news_220307_02.asp

The number of interracial marriages in Malaysia is growing, especially between Indians and Chinese.

While ethnicities such as “Malay”, “Indian” and “Chinese” are commonly taken for granted in official discourse as constitutive of the Malaysian social milieu, a growing number of Malaysians today also identify as being “mixed” or “mixed-race”

.
http://www.ukm.my/msc8/images/abstract/Caryn%20Lin.pdf

The far-right Malay supremacist Ibrahim Ali has been branded a "racist pig" and "fascist" (despite continually saying he has a Hindu driver and Chinese friends, hmmm).

The highest rate comment on this news article is "This racist PIG must be taught a lesson that will destroy his political ambition."

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/cat...-ali-a-lesson/

The highest rated comment on this news article is: "If Perkasa isn't racist, then I am Cinderella".

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/cat...re-not-racist/

"Instead of screaming and shouting at Ibrahim and getting all worked up and angry over his oft-repeated racial and religious slurs, why don’t we laugh instead?"

http://www.theborneopost.com/2013/11...#ixzz2w3QSRNfH

Philippines

Filipinos generally belong to several Asian ethnic groups classified linguistically as part of the Austronesian or Malayo-Polynesian speaking people.[154] It is believed that thousands of years ago Austronesian-speaking Taiwanese aborigines migrated to the Philippines from Taiwan, bringing with them knowledge of agriculture and ocean-sailing, eventually displacing the earlier Negrito groups of the islands.[156] They were later supplanted by arrivals of Chinese and Japanese in the northern islands, and Malays, Indians, Arabs in the southern islands. Later arrivals during the colonial period include more Japanese, Indians, Spaniards, Americans, as well as other European peoples. Intermarriage between the groups is evident in the major cities and urban areas.[157][158][159] Descendants of such mixed couples are known as mestizos.[160]

As opposed to the policies of other colonial powers such as the British or the Dutch, the Spanish colonies were devoid of any anti-miscegenation laws. Moreover, the Catholic Church not only never banned interracial marriage, but it even encouraged it. The fluid nature of racial integration in the Philippines during the Spanish colonial period was recorded by many travelers and public figures at the time, who were favorably impressed by the lack of racial discrimination, as compared to the situation in other European colonies.

According to the 2000 census, 28.1% of Filipinos are Tagalog, 13.1% Cebuano, 9% Ilocano, 7.6% Bisaya/Binisaya, 7.5% Hiligaynon, 6% Bikol, 3.4% Waray, and 25.3% as "others",[5][154] which can be broken down further to yield more distinct non-tribal groups like the Moro, the Kapampangan, the Pangasinense, the Ibanag, and the Ivatan.[155] There are also indigenous peoples like the Igorot, the Lumad, the Mangyan, the Bajau, and the tribes of Palawan.[156] Negritos, such as the Aeta and the Ati, are considered among the earliest inhabitants of the islands.[157]

Filipinos generally belong to several Asian ethnic groups classified linguistically as part of the Austronesian or Malayo-Polynesian speaking people.[156] It is believed that thousands of years ago Austronesian-speaking Taiwanese aborigines migrated to the Philippines from Taiwan, bringing with them knowledge of agriculture and ocean-sailing, eventually displacing the earlier Negrito groups of the islands.[158] They were later supplanted by arrivals of Chinese and Japanese in the northern islands, and Malays, Indians, Arabs in the southern islands. Later arrivals during the colonial period include more Japanese, Indians, Spaniards, Americans, as well as other European peoples. Intermarriage between the groups is evident in the major cities and urban areas.[159][160][161] Descendants of such mixed couples are known as mestizos.[162]

The two most important non-indigenous minorities include the Chinese and the Spaniards. Chinese Filipinos, mostly descended from immigrants from Fujian, China after 1898, number 2 million, although there is an estimated 28 million Filipinos who have partial Chinese ancestry, stemming from precolonial Chinese migrants.[163] Chinese Filipinos have a prominent role in the country's private sector, and are part of the larger bamboo network, a network of overseas Chinese businesses operating in the markets of Southeast Asia that share common family and cultural ties.[164] Other significant minorities include Americans, mostly White, numbering 300,000, and Koreans, numbering 96,000.

The number of Filipinos of part or entirely of European descent is about 3.6% according to research done by Standford University. Chinese Filipinos constitute 1.3% of the population, while people of mixed Chinese descent (Chinese mestizo) may be as high as 25%.

In other words, the Philippines is a multi-racial country of Austronesian, Malayo-Polynesian, Sino-Tibetan, Proto-Australoids as well as minorities of European, Arab, and Korean descent.

Singapore
Chinese 76.8%, Malay 13.9%, Indian 7.9%, other 1.4% (2000 census) (source:indexmundi)
In 2007 16.4% of all marriages in Singapore were interracial or inter-ethnic. This rate is far above that of "White Americans" (admittedly, including Hispanic white), which is a mere 2.2 percent. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to state that Euro-Americans (subject to Zionist control and brainwashing) are less likely to intermarry between races than Chinese and Indians in Singapore, and perhaps Malaysia as well. All this despite, of course, the absence of Zionist social engineering -- the very opposite of what you would expect if International Jewry in actual reality sought to exterminate the European race.

White Americans were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 2.1% of married White women and 2.3% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an Asian American woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other".

Among all newlyweds, 9.4% of whites, 17.1% of blacks, 25.7% of Hispanics and 27.7% of Asians married someone whose race or ethnicity was different from their own.

Incidentally, at this rate Afro-Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans will be extinct way before Euro-Americans. Not only are they intermarrying at faster rates, they are also in less supply.

Mali

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/201...n-malian-poll/

Angola and Mozambique
Hundreds of thousands of Portuguese have emigrated to Angola and Mozambique. In Angola, 2% of the population is of mixed race (mestico), 1% is European, and 1% is Asian (mostly Chinese).
"Ovimbundu 37%, Kimbundu 25%, Bakongo 13%, mestico (mixed European and native African) 2%, European 1%, other 22%" (source: indexmundi)

After Angola abandoned in 1991 the socialist regime adopted at independence in 1975, many Portuguese Angolans returned to Angola. Due to Angola's economic boom, which started in the 1990s, an increasing number of Portuguese without previous attachment to Angola have migrated to Angola for economic reasons, most importantly the recent national economic boom.[7] As of 2008, Angola was the preferred destination for Portuguese migrants in Africa.[7] Their migrations increased the Portuguese population to an estimated 120,000. At this stage (2011) most of them do not consider themselves as "Portuguese Angolans".

Latin America - Belize, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname
The slogan 'Africa for Africa, Asia for Asia, Europe for Everyone' neglects one subcontinent: Latin America. Logically, after all its existence negates the notion that multiracial and multiculturalism is promoted exclusively in Europe. For this reason it needs to be ignored. So the white nationalist always asks 'name one Asian or African country that is such and such...' as opposed to 'name one non-white country'. If they had one shred of intellectual integrity they would ask the latter and we, sane people, would have almost an entire continent at our disposal to refute their delusional world view as Latin America is a melting pot of ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity, with millions of people of mixed race descent, Asians, Amerindians, Europeans, and Africans.

Ecuador

In Ecuador, the government is planning to establish a 10 percent quota for Afro-Ecuadorian and Indigenous students in public and private secondary education. The policy is a response to Article 11.2 of the 2008 Ecuadorian Constitution: “The state will adopt affirmative action measures that promote equality in favor of those who find themselves in a situation of inequality.”7 The government also plans to set quotas for faculty and research staff at institutions of higher education.8

In a more limited fashion, the government, in conjunction with Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, created a program in which 15 Afro-Ecuadorian attorneys will be awarded scholarships to specialize in human rights specifically targeting Afro-descendant communities.9 Another government program awards 10 scholarships for Afro-Ecuadorian students who want to pursue master’s degrees.10 In 2009, the Ecuadorian government instituted a policy that grants an additional 2.5 points on civil service employment examinations for applicants of Indigenous or African ancestry.11 In 2010, the Ecuadorian government signed agreements with six local governments to build housing specifically for Afro-Ecuadorians.12

On the local level, the municipal government of Quito issued a declaration on March 15, 2012, establishing the “Decade of the Afro-Descendants of the Metropolitan District of Quito.”
During this decade, the municipal government is committed to implementing affirmative action policies for Afro-Ecuadorians.

Controversy arose when a racist song demeaned Afro-Ecuadorians.

+ YouTube Video

Venezuela

According to an autosomal DNA genetic study conducted in 2008 by the University of Brasilia (UNB) the composition of Venezuela's population is: 60.60% of European contribution, 23% of Amerindian contribution and 16,30% of African contribution.[4]

• Recognition of intercultural education in the 1999 Constitution;
• Social missions addressing poverty and inequality;
• The creation of the Presidential Commission for the Prevention and Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination in 2005;
• New Education Law approved in 2009;
• The incorporation of afrodescendent topics in the 2011 Census;
• The official celebration of the Month of Africa and Day of Afro-Venezuelans in May;
• The Establishment of the Vice-Minister for African Affairs;
• The upcoming new law against racism and discrimination.

See: http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/6159

Also see: http://www.leftfutures.org/2012/10/t...-in-venezuela/

Colombia

mestizo 58%, white 20%, mulatto 14%, black 4%, mixed black-Amerindian 3%, Amerindian 1% (source: indexmundi)

Affirmative action in Colombia: Afro-Colombian Social Movements by Peter Wade

By some estimates, Colombia has the second largest population of Afrodescendants in Latin America, after Brazil (Sanchez and Bryan 2003). It also arguably has the most
comprehensive array of legislation aimed at Afrodescendant people, covering special land titles for “black communities” (as defined by the law), ethno-education programs
in schools, university places reserved for candidates from black communities, representation on committees and decision-making bodies at various levels of the local, regional and national state, a special Directorate of Black Community Affairs, and two seats in the Chamber of Representatives of the Congress reserved for candidates representing black communities.

Anti-racist campaign in Colombia:
http://colombiareports.co/colombia-l...cism-campaign/

Ethnic and racial quotas: http://www.economist.com/node/14140625

"Honduras and Uruguay
The introduction of affirmative action policies for Afro-descendants in Honduras and Uruguay has been more limited. In 2007, the Honduran government mandated the creation of a scholarship program for Afro-Honduran students to continue their secondary education and attend university.13

In Uruguay, in 2006, the Ministry of Education and Culture instituted a fund for postgraduate scholarships, called the Beca Carlos Quijano, which targets Afro-Uruguayan students.14 In addition, a bill on affirmative action for Afro-descendants that includes provisions for university scholarships, an 8 percent set-aside in public-sector employment, and tax exemptions for private-sector employers that hire Afro-descendants is currently under discussion in the Uruguayan Senate after having been approved by the Chamber of Deputies on October 17, 2012. The fate of the legislation is unclear."

http://law.fordham.edu/30459.htm

Brazil

white 53.7%, mulatto (mixed white and black) 38.5%, black 6.2%, other (includes Japanese, Arab, Amerindian) 0.9%, unspecified 0.7% (2000 census) (source: indexmundi)

Note that this is self-reported, and that merely 48% of self-reported 'White Brazilians' ('Brasileiro branco') are of full European descent (25% is of European and African descent; 15% is of European, African, Amerindian descent; 14% is of European and Amerindian descent). For this reason it is not counted as a white country (which I earlier defined as a majority white country).

Brazil’s affirmative action policies began after the nation’s return to democratic rule in 1985. The democratization process slowly yielded political space to social movements that were launching public education campaigns to raise awareness of racial discrimination and the socioeconomic exclusion of Afro-Brazilians.

The first public policy change took place in 1999 in Porto Alegre, Brazil’s sixth-largest city. In that year, the municipal government passed a regulation that 5 percent of the work force of all publicly funded contracts with the city be negro (black). (Where Brazilian legislation refers to the population as negro when discussing the laws, I use the same language.) Similarly, the state of Bahia, where nonwhites constitute 75 percent of the population, adopted a rule requiring one-third of all models and actors in state publicity to be black.

Meanwhile, Brazil’s Black Movement was gaining greater international and domestic attention through its participation in venues such as the 2001 United Nations World Conference Against Racism and related gatherings.

Changes in federal policy soon followed. Brazil began instituting affirmative action policies on the federal level in 2001, when the Minister of Agrarian Development, Raul Jungmann, issued an executive order mandating that 20 percent of all administrative positions in the ministry be reserved for blacks, as well as 20 percent of the staff of firms contracting with the agency, and that another 20 percent of the firms’ staff be women.15 Just as in the U.S., there is an understanding that the government should act as a model employer, leading the way for fuller racial integration of the labor market.

Thereafter, the Federal Supreme Court and all other cabinet agencies established affi rmative action policies.16 The Court’s affi rmative action program set a quota of 20 percent for blacks for public-sector contractors.17

The Ministry of Justice’s affirmative action program reserved 20 percent of supervisory and upper-level advisory positions for black and pardo (brown) Brazilians. In 2002, a presidential executive decree established the National Affirmative Action Program to encourage the implementation of percentage-based goals for Afro-descendants’ participation in federal agencies and the firms under contract with them.

Like the Brazilian federal government, local governments have also launched affirmative action programs. For example, in June 2011, the state of Rio de Janeiro issued a decree establishing a 20 percent set-aside of vacancies for blacks and persons of Indigenous descent in the public examinations for civil service positions in the state government.18

What is particularly noteworthy about Brazil is that it has the most extensive set of university affi rmative action programs in the region that target Afro-descendants.

By August 2010, at least 80 public universities in Brazil had adopted affirmative action policies. The structures of the current programs vary.19
Some only target Afro-Brazilian students from public secondary schools as a way of reaching the neediest Afro- Brazilian students; other programs set aside seats for public secondary school graduates of any race and then establish proportional slots by race according to demographic percentages in that state.

Another variation establishes separate quotas for Afro-Brazilian students (from public or private secondary schools), in addition to a quota for public school students of any race.
A few universities award extra points to the entrance examination scores of Afro-Brazilian applicants and public secondary school graduates. Both mechanisms ensure that middle-class Afro-Brazilians, who have also been underrepresented in public universities and affected by racial discrimination, will not be excluded by class or socioeconomic considerations.

So far, Brazilian courts have upheld the laws against a number of challenges. On April 26, 2012, in a case that challenged the University of Brasilia’s affirmative action policy, the Federal Supreme Court ruled the policy constitutionally valid.20 The landmark unanimous decision declared such policies essential for the state to fulfill its obligation of ensuring the equality of opportunity for
every citizen. One of the 10 participating justices, Minister Luiz Fux, even stated that the constitutional provision establishing the government responsibility “to build a free, just and supportive society” requires the reparation for past damages suffered by Afro-Brazilians, and argued that affirmative action fulfi lls that constitutional obligation.

One week later, the Court also affirmed the constitutionality of the University for All Program (ProUni), which provides scholarships for Afro-descendant students from low income families to attend private universities.21

After the rulings, in August 2012, the Brazilian state institutionalized affirmative action in all public federal universities with the Law of Social Quotas. The law requires federal public universities to reserve half of all new admission spots for public high school graduates. Half of those reserved spots are set aside for students whose household family income falls below 1.5 times the minimum wage (currently set at 678 reais or $325 per month) per family member. The law also mandates that within that 50 percent set-aside, spots be reserved for Afro-descendants and persons of Indigenous ancestry, proportional to their relative populations within each state.

Empirical data indicate that the Brazilian affirmative action programs have been successful. For instance, a study of student outcomes at the State University of Campinas found that students from socioeconomically and educationally disadvantaged backgrounds performed relatively better than those from a higher socioeconomic and educational level.22

The study concluded that the need for hard work when striving for greater opportunity (as in preparing for the university admission examination when coming from an under-resourced public secondary school) creates an “educational resilience” that improves performance once a student is admitted to university. The educational resilience of the less-privileged students resulted in higher grade point averages after only one year of university study in 31 of the 55 possible undergraduate courses.

Overall, the relative performance of the affirmative action students was higher in 48 of the 55 courses.

Studies of student outcomes at the University of Brasilia, the State University of North Fluminense, the Federal University of Bahia, the State University of Rio de Janeiro, and the Federal University of Espirito Santo found similar results: affirmative action students succeed once provided the opportunity of admission.

Furthermore, growing numbers of Brazilians and program beneficiaries have come to view affi rmative action as positive. Indeed, in the 2010 survey of applicants to the State University of Rio de Janeiro, 85.4 percent of the black and Indigenous affirmative action candidates stated they were in agreement with the quota system.23 In contrast, in 2005, only 66.8 percent of affirmative action candidates stated that the affirmative action policy was a positive matter.24 In fact, the most common stereotype about the program beneficiaries among students is that they are cones (nerds) who prefer to work all the time rather than party.25 The general student body’s respect for the program participants is illustrated by the following law student’s reflection: “I can tell you that I’m in the third year and I don’t see any real difference between the grades of the quota and non-quota students. Many cotistas [quota students] do very well, and they definitely deserve to be here; this fact has made me change my [negative] opinion of quotas in the last few years.”26 Similarly, in a 2007 study of 557 university instructors, the vast majority appreciated that affirmative action had contributed to democratizing the academic space by having it more accurately reflect Brazilian society.27 Furthermore, many university instructors report that the affirmative action programs do not create racial tension or hostility in the university.28
http://law.fordham.edu/30459.htm

Additionally, check out these links:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23862676
http://www.economist.com/node/14140625
http://www.economist.com/blogs/ameri...-action-brazil

Turkey
Turkish 70-75%, Kurdish 18%, other minorities 7-12% (2008 est.) (source: indexmundi)
Ethnic minorities in Turkey were assimilated and their identities denied. Today, a gradual process of acceptance of cultural diversity is underway with more recognition of minority rights.

Sri Lanka
Sinhalese 73.8%, Sri Lankan Moors 7.2%, Indian Tamil 4.6%, Sri Lankan Tamil 3.9%, other 0.5%, unspecified 10% (2001 census provisional data) (source: indexmundi)
Sri Lanka also has affirmative action.

Jordan
Population: 5,500,000, of which 360,000 are Indian, 200,000 Afghanistan, 90,000 Pakistanis, 80,000 Russians, 50,000 Bulgarians. 14% of the population belong to these ethnic groups. Additionally, 1% of the population is Armenian, and 1% is Circassian. Much richer countries like Spain have less immigrants and foreigners of different races and ethnicities. Thus, by extension of the argument of these white nationalists there is a genocide ongoing against Arabs (as well as Ashkenazi Jews for that matter). (source: migrationmap.net)

Caribbean America
The Caribbean Americans are highly multiracial. Islands, as well as Suriname and Guyana (similar in ethnic composition), are composed of Afro-Caribbeans and West Indians, Asians (Hindus or Indians, and Javanese), and whites.

China:

"Preferential policies" required some of the top positions in governments be distributed to ethnic minorities and women. Also, many universities are required by government to give preferred admissions to ethnic minorities.[21][22]

Afghanistan
Pashtun 42%, Tajik 27%, Hazara 9%, Uzbek 9%, Aimak 4%, Turkmen 3%, Baloch 2%, other 4% (source: indexmundi)

Thailand
Thai 75%, Chinese 14%, other 11% (source: indexmundi)

Kazakhstan
Kazakh (Qazaq) 63.1%, Russian 23.7%, Uzbek 2.8%, Ukrainian 2.1%, Uighur 1.4%, Tatar 1.3%, German 1.1%, other 4.5% (1999 census) (source: indexmundi)

Pakistan
Punjabi 44.68%, Pashtun (Pathan) 15.42%, Sindhi 14.1%, Sariaki 8.38%, Muhajirs 7.57%, Balochi 3.57%, other 6.28% (source: indexmundi)
In Pakistan, there are 1,500,000 Bangladeshi, 250,000 Europeans, 80,000 Chinese, and 300,000 Nepalese.

India
India is a plural society in terms of racial, linguistic, and cultural diversity.
Indo-Aryan 72%, Dravidian 25%, Mongoloid and other 3% (2000) (indexmundi)
Additionally, there are 3.8 million Bangladeshi migrants, 1.3 Pakistani migrants, and 650,000 Nepalese migrants, though I presume not many belong to a different racial category than the Indian population.

India knows no state sanctioned racism, but Indian society is permeated with racial prejudice as evidenced by the multitude of African students in India being frequent victims of racist attacks and sexual assault.

Interestingly, intermarriage in India gave rise to a diverse population, however from 1900 onward:

In a fascinating study of how different types of populations mixed in India, scientists have found that there were three stages of intermixing.

In ancient times, over 4000 years ago, there were two separate populations based in north and south India with no mixing. Then, in the second stage between 4000 years ago and 1900 years ago, comes a phase of widespread intermingling of populations, which penetrated to even the most isolated groups. Finally, from around 1900 years onwards, several subgroups of the already mixed population stopped marrying outside their group, and thus became frozen.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...medical-school

Incidentally, intermarriage did not require a Zionist overlord, nor did anyone call it genocide.

Sociologists Kevin Reilly, Stephen Kaufman, Angela Bodino, while being critical of casteism, conclude that modern India does not practice any "apartheid" since there is no state sanctioned discrimination.[37] They write that Casteism in India is presently "not apartheid. In fact, untouchables, as well as tribal people and members of the lowest castes in India benefit from broad affirmative action programmes and are enjoying greater political power."[37]

Tribal individuals, religious minorities, and members of lower-caste enjoy a comprehensive affirmative action programme.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservation_in_India

India reserves 7.5% of seats in all levels of legislation -- the national parliament, state assemblies, municipal councils, and village assemblies -- for Indian aboriginals, adivasi. Two states, Kerala and Bihar, reserve seats for people of European or mixed-European descent (Anglo-Indians).

Morocco
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Afric...ion-to-Morocco

Anti-racism in Morocco:
https://twitter.com/Boutaina/statuse...62747045990400

Japan
The Japanese word 'Gaijin' (meaning outsider) has slowly fallen out of use due to political correctness.
While racially homogeneous due to strict and tight, dare I say racist, immigration controls, the demographic threat ensures that Japanese will go extinct within the next thousand years.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/n...-in-1000-years

Egypt

Egypt is not quite heterogeneous but it does host some two million Sudanese and African migrants, along some 1.7 million descendants of Nubians. The Nubians are featured in this song (the dark-skinned man singing about the "ancient Nuba" and the Nile river) calling on all Egyptians to stand together:

+ YouTube Video

It would certainly be regarded as politically correct if it had been broadcasted in a white country. That is not to say that political correctness exists beyond this at all in Egypt:

The absence of a culture of political correctness in [Egyptian] society that generally promotes very limited and monolithic ideals of identity means that minority rights suffer ... The Nubians want a formal apology and an end to airing the song in Egypt. Perhaps this will call attention to an endemic culture of racial stereotyping in the region and raise the standards of reference to darker-skinned Arabs in Egypt and elsewhere.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...ey-arab-racism

This was in reference to a racist incident:

In 2009, lyrics in one of Wehbe song's Baba Fein (from her unreleased 2010 kids album) seemed to refer to Nubians as "monkeys". Exact translation: "Where is my teddy bear and the Nubian monkey?".[17][18] Black Egyptians accused the artist of racism and singing a song that fueled racism and discrimination against them.[19] In 2010 a lawsuit filed against Wehbe was dropped.

5. Anti-Racism outside of White Countries

White nationalists claim anti-racism and promotion of diversity are alien to non-white countries. Note that the number of organisations and movements challenging racism outside of white countries may be skewed unfavourably because I only have access to English-based sources.

Anti-Racist Movements outside of White Countries

• Anti-Racist Movement (Lebanon)
• Landless Workers' Movement (Brazil)
• Çarşı (Turkey)
• Kurdistan Workers' Party (Turkey)
• Movement of Free Iraqis / Free Iraqis Movement (Basra, Iraq)
• Democratic Union Party (Syria)
• Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (Iran)
• People's Mujahadeen (Iran)
• Anarchists against the Wall (Israel)
• Hapoel Tel Aviv FC (Israel)
• Hadash (Israel)
• Abahlali baseMjondolo (South Africa)
• People's Front of Anti-Racism (Japan)
• Japanese Communist Party (Japan)
• Every communist, anarchist, and socialist movement or party around the world.

Other Challenges of Racism outside White Countries

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opi...519107286.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tom-..._b_980065.html

Gadaffi stimulated African immigration into Libya and said, in the Green Book claimed black people would come to dominate the world, something he championed, and said that he wanted Libya to become a "black" (African) country.

http://m.gulfnews.com/news/gulf/kuwa...-law-1.1180155

A Kuwaiti lawmaker has called for dropping a “racist” clause in the citizenship law that limits granting the nationality only to Muslims.

“Clause Five of Article Four of the Citizenship Law which stipulates that the nationality be given only to Muslims is unfamiliarly racist and abominable,” MP Khalil Al Saleh said.

http://www.solidarity.net.au/55/the-...-in-sri-lanka/

http://blackagendareport.com/content...n-racism-india

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14965062

Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) challenged racist attitudes against 'black' Egyptians. It recommended that the government "should intensify and accelerate efforts to combat racist and xenophobic views towards migrant workers, especially those of Black African origin, and to promote awareness of their positive contribution to society. The government should train all personnel working in the field of criminal justice and law enforcement officials in the spirit of respect for human rights and non-discrimination on ethnic or racial grounds." http://eipr.org/en/report/2010/03/06/635/639(source)

Human rights organisations also frequently expose and challenge racism, discrimination, and xenophobia in non-white countries.

Promotion of Interracial Relations on TV
White nationalists claim TV -- commercials, film, TV-series, promote -- interracial relations. An MTV commercial involving all ethnicities imaginable is seen as a Jewish conspiracy to promote interracial relationships, rather than marketing targeting all ethnicities -- with one being batshit insane, and another reasonable.
The American Gangster: Black and Hispanic

If Hollywood is subject to Judeo-Liberal and Zionist control to promote interracial relationships it would make no sense for them to simultaneously produce shows that 'promote' (i.e. visualise or narrate) a story wherein Jewish characters form relationships with non-Jewish characters. Yet, these shows are numerous. In The Nanny, Jewish character Fran Fine eventually marries the British Sheffield. In Seinfeld Jerry Seinfeld frequently dates non-Jews, including main character Elaine Benes. George Costanza, from Seinfeld, is a half Jewish character (which, evidently, requires interracial relations with non-Jews). In Friends Ross Geller, a Jew, marries Rachel Green, a non-Jew, and Monica Geller, a Jew, marries Chandler Bing, a non-Jew. Louis Litt, a Jew, from Suits is single but pursued a non-Jewish woman to the extent of it being considered harassment. Jewish character Kyle Broflovski in South Park pursues a girl of African descent in episode .... . Jewish character Josh Lyman from the series The West Wing fancies non-Jewish protestant character Donna Moss.
Then, of course, there are innumerable celebrities of mixed Jewish background, including former football player Edgar David (Jewish and African descent) and Lenny Kravitz (Jewish and African descent), of which there are too many to list. Nevertheless, it refutes the white nationalist narrative that somehow Jewry is this monolithic ethnic group with a common goal to destroy the white race.

6. Conclusion
If Western Europe and North America were the only areas wherein affirmative action (the 'promotion of diversity') and migration were upheld it would be nothing more than an anomaly in a prejudiced world. It would not follow that therefore a massive Zionist conspiracy to destroy the white race exists. If we look at the facts, however, we see that this is not even true.

We have seen that immigration into affluent Arabic countries is widespread, and far more massive than immigration into Western Europe, and astronomically more widespread than into Eastern Europe. We have seen that ethnic-based multiculturalism exists from Malaysia to Turkey and from Brazil to Iraq. We have seen that policies promoting diversity, such as affirmative action, exist throughout Latin America.

Multiculturalism, affirmative action, and immigration in and into white countries are not anomalies, the lack of these social phenomena in Japan and South Korea are, in fact, anomalies. But then again, birth rates in Taiwan, China, Japan, and South Korea are generally lower than those of Western and white countries. Taking the logic of these white nationalists to its logical conclusions we have to conclude that there is an ongoing genocide against whites in the Western world, Amerindians in the Americas, Asians in East Asia, Arabs in the Middle East, etc.

Inter-country comparisons:

France:
1. European: 85%
2. Arabic/Berber: 10%
3. African 3.5%
4. Asian 1.5%

Net migration rate: 1.1
Intermarriage rate: 11.8%

USA:
1. European and Arab 63.7%
2. Hispanic / Latino: 16%
3. African: 13%
4. Asian: 4.8%
5. Other: 2.5%

Net migration rate: 3.62
Intermarriage rate: 15.1%

Netherlands:
1. European: 85.7%
2. Indonesian: 2.4%
3. Turkish: 2.2%
4. Surinamese: 2%
5. Moroccan: 2%
6. Other: 5.6%

Net migration rate: 2.02
Interrelationship rate: 6%
Intermarriage rate: 9.5%

Colombia:
1. Mestizo 58%
2. European 20%
3. Mulatto 14%
4. Black 4%
5. Mixed black-Amerindian 3%
6. Amerindian 1%

Net migration rate: -0.66
Intermarriage rate: 25%
Since I could not find any statistics, I'm going to do something very ignorant, I'm going to add up the interracial population and divide by three: 25%

Israel:
1. Ashkenazim: 38%
2. Middle Eastern Jews: 36%
3. Arab: 20%
4. African: 3%
5. Other: 3%

Net migration rate: 1.94
Intermarriage rate: 22%
Since I could not find relevant statistics, I'm going to do something very ignorant, I'm going to take the number of multi-ethnic children, 28%, and subtract a random number to account for childless marriages: 6. The number is likely to be quite high as 10% of African jews in Israel marry outside their racial group, which Haaretz refers to as being "exempt from the trend [of increasing interracial and inter-ethnic marriages between Jews]." (source)

---------------

Highest intermarriage rate:
1. Colombia 25%
2. Israel 22%
3. USA 15.1%

Highest migration rate:
1. USA 3.62
2. Netherlands 2.02
3. Israel 1.94

Most ethnically and racially diverse country:
1. Colombia
2. Israel
3. USA

This reveals that white countries are not quite anomalous in terms of multiculturalism and multiracial social norms. Let's go over the (fallacious) list of claims:

• Mass immigration and multiculturalism are promoted only in white countries and all white countries

Mass immigration is not a unique occurrence to white countries, and certainly not all white countries. Mass immigration to rich countries is more a rule than the exception, with the exceptions being Japan and South Korea. Other than that, affluent countries like the GCC-countries, Israel, Western Europe, and North America all have gone through a period of mass immigration, with the GCC-countries the most significant. Nor are white countries unique in the promotion of multiculturalism, Latin America and Israel, and gradually Turkey, employ various means to promote integration and/or assimilation. Such is not an unnatural phenomenon and therefore indicative of a clandestine conspiracy, but logic in a modernised society to wish to guard social peace between different social groups.
Countries that both have promotion of multicultural and mass immigration are Canada, Israel, United States, and Western Europe. Eastern Europe is exempt.

• Diversity and interracial marriage is celebrated only in white countries

The celebration of interracial marriage in white countries is a purely subjective observation and does not lend itself to objective evaluation. Supposed 'celebrations' of diversity are interpreted as such by white nationalists, but in reality may be better characterised as marketing toward . In fact, US TV shows tend to have an over representation of people of European descent and Jews form interracial relationships with non-Jews all the time.

Interracial marriage is common amongst Jews (of different races and ethnicities, evidently) as well as between Chinese and Indians in Malaysia and Singapore.

• Government policies stimulate integration and assimilation only in white countries

The government of Israel actively pursues assimilation of Jews through public policy. Many Latin American governments

• Birth rates are kept too low (by some external force, the Jews of course) for white populations to be sustainable

Birth rates amongst Jews, Asians, GCC-countries inhabitants, and Europeans is relatively low.

-------------------

I attempted to make a sort of "genocide-o-meter" scale based on white nationalists' claims. This scale tries to simplify the issue (and with it it loses nuance -- it's not entirely accurate but it gets the point across). The greener a country or region is, the more "genocidal", the redder a country is, the less "genocidal" it is (using the white nationalists' logic).

If the world had looked like it does in the first image then claiming that Europeans are victim of ethnic cleansing or genocide would be credible, and I imagine this is what white nationalists tell themselves is what the real world looks like:



But the world looks far different from this.



As we can see Israel is as "genocidal" to its population as Western Europe and North America, while being more "genocidal" than Eastern Europe and Uruguay (as well as Argentina and Chile for that matter). The only thing that stands in the way of the listed Latin American countries (with the exception of Mexico) to score the same as Western Europe and North America on the "genocide scale" is the limited migration into their countries. This limited migration is the result of unfavourable socio-economic conditions, and not tight migration controls (as, for example, evidenced by hundreds of thousands of Portuguese having recently migrated to Brazil as it had greater job opportunities with Portugal in crisis). If these countries raise to the same level of economic development as, say, the Netherlands then it would perhaps face a similar influx of migrants -- I say perhaps, because white Latin American countries, namely Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, have no such influx of migrants. In other words, there's not much unique about the situation faced by white countries. There is no white genocide.

Appendix. The Origins of the Concept of 'White Genocide'

Now that we've refuted the concept of 'white genocide' and exposed its utter ridiculousness, how come people have embraced a notion so delusional?

There's two reasons for this 'white genocide' thing.
One is affirmative action, and other regulations to reduce white privilege. White supremacists see the state actively involved in lowering their social position while raising that of non-whites, and conclude that the government must be out to get whitey.

The second one is the white supremacist's disgust with race mixing. One-drop rule says that even one non-white ancestor means a person isn't white, therefore a non-white couple destroys an opportunity for the propagation of the white race. Few governments still encourage race segregation and interracial couples aren't frowned upon as much anymore. However, to the white supremacist, racial segregation is the natural state of things, and the logical conclusion is that the current state of affairs must be the result of a conscious effort (by the state/jewish conspiracy/whatever) to make people go against their natural inclinations.

In both cases the belief is not so much that some entity is actively rounding up whites and sending them to death camps, but that some entity (government, jews, etc) are actively involved in a campaign to destroy the white race through insidious methods.

(insert Don Black letter here)

Overall, as the largest group, European Americans have the lowest poverty rate[18] and the second highest educational attainment levels, median household income,[19] and median personal income[20] of any racial demographic in the United States.

As if it's so unimaginable that liberals would want to enact policies that would enable people of different backgrounds to peacefully live together and enjoy wealth in comparative degrees, that instead it must be an implausible Zionist conspiracy.
It seems entirely likely that these white nationalists cannot bring themselves to associate with non-whites, in either friendly or romantic or sexual relationships and project their own prejudices unto a human nature and conclude that races do not naturally mix. From this they infer that therefore the present period of multiculturalism is artificially induced through propaganda and devious control over political affairs by some external force: International Jewry.

--------------------
Persecution complex

white nationalists preserving white privilege
senior advocacy preserving baby boom privilege
men's rights activism preserving male privilege

[Tim Cornelis]

Unfortunately I ran out of characters on the blog. I will update this post with additional counter-arguments, incoherently and unorganised.

A genetic study by Stanford University indicates that at least 3.6% of the population are European or of part European descent from both Spanish and American colonization.[29]

In the United States, intermarriage among Filipinos with other races is common. They have the largest number of interracial marriages among Asian immigrant groups, as documented in California.[30] It is also noted that 21.8% of Filipino Americans are of mixed lineage, second among Asian Americans after the Japanese, and is the fastest growing.[31]

White Americans were statistically the least likely to wed interracially, though in absolute terms they were involved in interracial marriages more than any other racial group due to their demographic majority. 2.1% of married White women and 2.3% of married White men had a non-White spouse. 1.0% of all married White men were married to an Asian American woman, and 1.0% of married White women were married to a man classified as "other".
4.6% of married Black American women and 10.8% of married Black American men had a non-Black spouse. 8.5% of married Black men and 3.9% of married Black women had a White spouse. 0.2% of married Black women were married to Asian American men, representing the least prevalent marital combination.

Mixed race models promoted in Malaysia: http://www.intermix.org.uk/news/news_220307_02.asp

While ethnicities such as “Malay”, “Indian” and “Chinese” are commonly taken for granted in official discourse as constitutive of the Malaysian social milieu, a growing number of Malaysians today also identify as being “mixed” or “mixed-race”

.
http://www.ukm.my/msc8/images/abstract/Caryn%20Lin.pdf


social cohesion, promoting, social peace, business conduct, not conspiracy, as if weird.

[Flying Purple People Eater]

Those graphics actually had my eyes bleeding.

"Asia for the Asians"? What the fuck do these people even mean by Asia anyway? China? Turkey? Pakistan? Everything to the East of Europe? Not only are Europe and Asia the same continuous continental plate (meaning that they, in modern geographical terms, shouldn't even be classified as separate continents), but Asia holds half the world's god-damn population and is filled with thousands of different ethnicities, cultures and politics. Maybe the term holds relevance in America where terms like 'person of colour' are used to denote anyone who isn't anglo, but there is absolutely, positively no such thing as an 'Asian'. To even believe the 'anti-racist = anti-white' tripe, you'd have to be a completely myopic hermit who knows zilch about the world.


Also, on Iran. You should mention that some countries have always had heterogenous populations, like Iran. In Iran, one in ten people are/can speak Azeri (Persian Turkish), a few million are/can speak Kurdish and Mazanderani, a few more million are Balochi and speak Balochi in the south, and there are a few hundred thousand Arabic and Aramaic speakers along the coast of the Persian Gulf and the lower Caucasus, respectively.

Iran is certainly not just 'for the Iranians'. It has enormous ethnic, linguistic and cultural diversity. Racists get around this by using geography to denote ethnic groups - these groups mentioned above are now all 'muslim' and should stay in 'muslim land'. What's most ironic is that these racists do not use their flawed logic on themselves; I don't see swathes of these 'anti-racist = anti-white' groups taking boats back to the British isles anytime soon.

[xxxxxx666666]

Also, if I may add, there has never been a homogeneous nation that I know of, even Japan has ethnic groups like the Ryukyuan, Yamato, and Ainu people .

Also there is Guangzhou where there is a sizeable community of black Africans primarily concentrated in Yuexiu District and Baiyun District in Guangzhou, China. So look!

Aficans in China, Communist China no less!

[#FF0000]

The one "INDIA IS WHERE INDIANS LIVE" really sends me reeling because "Indians" are anything but a homogenous group. The Indian subcontinent is one of the most ethnically and culturally diverse regions on the planet.

[Tim Cornelis]

bump

[Bolshevik Sickle]

IMO these so called "WNs" and Anti-whites are both babies that need to get pacifiers glued to their faces.

Also, white genocide is a myth, and the Whittaker mantra is bull.

I can't post links but look up "White Genocide debunked" on YouTube by TheTruePookah

[Was tun, wenn's brennt?]

"Anti-racist is code for anti-white" is a silly thing to say because it presupposes that only white people can be racist. My own experience and simple logic can easily refute such a silly position. I've often heard that silly mantra from people as responded to them exactly as above. That being said, one could (rightly) claim that anti-racist is another way of saying anti-white-privilege. The only people who would take issue with anti-white-privilege are people who enjoy the benefit of it and would see it continue unhindered. These people are most likely the same people who claim "anti-racist is anti-white", which belies (at the very least) covert racist beliefs if not overt ones. In either case the most appropriate response is likely a ground and pound.

[Alonso Quijano]

I'm stuck at subgrouping the Jews - to begin with, Spinoza was Sephardic, Marx probably as well, and Heine at least wanted to believe his Sephardic.

People thought of themself es either one of those especially in communities in the Balkan, for example, were there were both (but mostly Sephardim). There, sometimes people assimilated onto Sephardic families, community and culture.

Only in Israel this really became and identity thing, but there's no one Ashkenazi identity. Ashkenazim choose to identify as Israeli, mostly. In Israel, everyone who wasn't Ashkenazi became known as "Sephardic", but Spanish-spekaers from the Balkan quite hate it, so term such as "Spanyolim" were added. I'm of mixed heritage, but feel Sephardic, because my heritage is my family's culture and language. Ashkenazmi's heritage (or Sephardim or Mizrahim in more "Western" places of Europe) is being a Christ-killer who no one will employ, and no will buy an art he made, so he's kind of stuck with usury and mercantilism in 19th and 20th century Europe. My family in Turkey or in Greece had much less of a problem. They didn't really feel hated at any point during their lives their (apart from when the Nazis came to Greece - but even then, there was a major Greek resistance).

"Mizrahi" is an umbrella term that not all "Mizrahim" adopt.

In many places in Europe the Jew (especially the Ashkenazi Jew, yes, but also the Sephardic who lived in the Netherlands, I guess) was turned into a caricature that the people who hate him made themselves. Marx wrote about it a few times.

The "melting pot" is dead, everyone knows at. That's why Jews from Russia have their own distinct cultrue today. They weren't forced to drop it. Obviously there's some sense I feel of being Israeli, or even of being from my town. The racism in Israel is mostly hidden.

As for where are Jews considered "ruining the country" - think more about the financial possibilites of migrating there. In Greece people just use the antisemitic rhetoric that they heard from the east, it isn't really theirs. There are almost no Jews in Greece today, and assuming they speak Greek today, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference. In Russia no one saw any problem with them when the USSR did good. However today the leader of their Communist Party blames the Jews from the old party for conspiring to take the capital away from Russia.

As for the organizations you mentioned in Israel: It's more of an old stigma about Hapoel, cross-town rivals Maccabi have Arabs in their line-ups, and whenever the "Ultras" sing racist songs the majority of the fans boo them. Both clubs are considered elitist, especially outside of Central Israel, for being from Tel-Aviv. No real georaphical/ideological difference between the majority of the fans for these two clubs. Hadash is being long criticised for practically being an Arab Nationalist Party + Dov Khenin. They have the "Israeli Communist Party" inside them, but it sounds like Stalinists in the 50s.

In Turkey it wasn't exactly assimilation, at least not for the Jews - my great-grandmother was a housewife and didn't speak a word in Turkish, my grandfather (her son) got a Turkish First name and they played a bit to make their last name appear Turkish, but at home they all spoke Turkish. The boys were "trained" to see themselves "more Turkish" in relation to the girls because of the army, and business, I guess. Today there's more of an assimilation. But it came out of fear, at least then - however I should note that the Turkish people don't look homogenous at all. However Jews were less on the target by the state than the Kurds or Armenians, because they because they were less likely to protest, the only reason for tension would be probably religious, if at all.

I really like your effort and ambition. Some interesting points.

[Concerned Marxist]

I never bother with these fascist "freedom fighters." Most of their ranks are consisted of teenagers that were never hugged by their mothers.