Thread: Move to defund Toronto Pride deferred

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  1. #1
    Global Moderator Supporter
    Forum Moderator
    Global Moderator
    Join Date Jul 2006
    Location Toronto
    Posts 4,185
    Organisation
    NOTA
    Rep Power 63

    Default Move to defund Toronto Pride deferred

    Move to defund Toronto Pride deferred to May 28

    After several hours of debate April 23, city council’s executive committee voted to defer further discussion of Pride funding and the legalities of banning the words “Israeli apartheid” at city-funded events, ensuring ongoing uncertainty about the future of Pride Toronto’s annual cultural grant.

    Early in the day, Councillor Shelley Carroll confirmed to Xtra that Councillor David Shiner plans to ignore the advice of city staff and submit a motion to remove Pride’s cultural grant as a penalty for allowing the group Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) to participate in the Pride parade.

    Instead, Shiner later moved a motion to defer the item until the next executive committee meeting, May 28. It would then head to council in June.

    This means that Pride — which attracts more than one million people and annually brings tens of millions of dollars into Toronto — won’t know whether it will receive the city’s annual grant of $123,807 until just days before the festival is set to begin.

    This is the third year Pride has faced a censorship battle with a small handful of councillors just as planning for the event kicks into high gear.

    Meanwhile, three city staff reports once again determined that the use of the term “Israeli apartheid” is not a criminal offence and does not contravene any city policy.

    “This was enormously disrespectful to Pride. It is one of the major summer festivals in the city. To be treated this way is just disgraceful,” says QuAIA member Tim McCaskell. "I can only see this treatment as homophobic."

    Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam suspects that deferring the issue for a month is a “ploy to intimidate and silence” the activists and community groups who spoke. “These councillors already know how they are going to vote. I can’t imagine why they would defer this,” she says. “If deputants spoke to the item today, they will not be able to speak to the item again on May 28.”

    Full article: http://www.xtra.ca/public/Toronto/Mo..._28-13461.aspx

    Queers Against Israeli Apartheid site: http://queersagainstapartheid.org/
  2. The Following User Says Thank You to blake 3:17 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date May 2012
    Location Murfreesboro TN
    Posts 313
    Organisation
    ALECS - Achieving Liberation through the Elimination of Capitalist Statehood
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    wow, way to hide your homophobia with imperialism.
  4. #3
    Join Date Feb 2013
    Location dying in a den in Bombay
    Posts 4,142
    Organisation
    sympatiser, ICL-FI
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Or imperialist hysteria with homophobia - pride events are easy targets, but it seems that what really ticked the councilors off what the mention of Israeli policy. Of course, homophobia probably plays a role here, unfortunately.

    I wonder what the response of the bourgeois gay organisations has been. These people have proven themselves to be completely out of touch with most LGBT people - actually, they usually have problems acknowledging the T - and are not above supporting "their" government if they think it will result in some benefit (to the ultraminority of rich LGBT people, of course).
  5. #4
    Join Date May 2012
    Location Murfreesboro TN
    Posts 313
    Organisation
    ALECS - Achieving Liberation through the Elimination of Capitalist Statehood
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Or imperialist hysteria with homophobia - pride events are easy targets, but it seems that what really ticked the councilors off what the mention of Israeli policy. Of course, homophobia probably plays a role here, unfortunately.

    I wonder what the response of the bourgeois gay organisations has been. These people have proven themselves to be completely out of touch with most LGBT people - actually, they usually have problems acknowledging the T - and are not above supporting "their" government if they think it will result in some benefit (to the ultraminority of rich LGBT people, of course).
    why do you think "'out' in the military" has been such a big crusade for so many years? because they want more of their poor constituents out there supporting the power structure.

Similar Threads

  1. Europe: Tory civil war deferred
    By Die Neue Zeit in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 1st February 2013, 18:25
  2. Tory MP punished for supporting Toronto pride
    By Salyut in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 8th July 2009, 06:50
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th February 2008, 21:40
  4. Black Pride, Gay Pride, Straight Pride
    By Black Dagger in forum Anti-Discrimination
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 12th January 2007, 06:53
  5. what is pride? - national pride
    By redstarshining in forum Theory
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 16th January 2003, 20:40

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread