Thread: Stance on gun control

Results 1 to 10 of 10

  1. #1
    Join Date Aug 2011
    Location Michigan, U$A
    Posts 1,252
    Rep Power 20

    Default Stance on gun control

    I never really understand (because I never asked) what the Marxist opinion is on gun control. I understand arming the proletariat and all. Opinion welcomed
    Thanks
    Yes, we want to make your wife a radical feminist lesbian, we want to forcibly gay marry you to a leatherclad bear, we want to send your kids into white slavery at the court of a black communist dictator, we want to paint your church red with the blood of christian babies, we want to set fire to your ikea and your SUV, we want to rape your labrador with the broken pieces of your white picketed fence.

    We want to wage nuclear war on the nuclear family.
    why? because we are pinko freedom hating commienazi atheist bastards, its just what we do.
    ~psycho
  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bostana For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date Oct 2007
    Posts 11,673
    Organisation
    IWW
    Rep Power 276

    Default

    General against things like the assault weapons bans. I think background checks are fine though.

    To be honest I don't feel too strongly. I just want to be able to shoot at paper.
    I'm on some sickle-hammer shit
    Collective Bruce Banner shit

    FKA: #FF0000, AKA Mistake Not My Current State Of Joshing Gentle Peevishness For The Awesome And Terrible Majesty Of The Towering Seas Of Ire That Are Themselves The Milquetoast Shallows Fringing My Vast Oceans Of Wrath

  4. #3
    Join Date Apr 2009
    Location The Outer Limits
    Posts 1,926
    Rep Power 22

    Default

    Almost everyone should be able to own a gun. Except criminals and lunatics. Or people that want to own ten thousand guns and pipe bombs ...
    that's just not normal.
    money is to politics as fertilizer is to garden weeds.
  5. #4
    Join Date Mar 2013
    Posts 75
    Rep Power 7

    Default

    From a revolutionary standpoint the people should arm themselves to fight and resist, but from the standpoint of maintaining a civil society (assuming a fascist society has been destroyed) , i don`t think complete gun bans or complete gun ownership are solutions. I believe in ownership that keeps guns regulated and protected.
    “Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”

    ― John Steinbeck
  6. #5
    Join Date Apr 2013
    Location West Virginia, USA
    Posts 81
    Rep Power 7

    Default

    I am against gun control. Gun control is not designed to stop crime like supporters tell you but rather to allow the state to monopolize the means of violence by restricting the populace's access to weapons. Hopefully the revolution will not turn into a complete Russian Civil War type shootout but if it does the revolutionary proletariat will want to be able to defend itself from the forces of reaction. There are too many examples of revolutionary left groups being stamped out by government thugs. As revolutionaries who advocate for the overthrow of such power structures we should be opposed to such measures.
  7. #6
    Join Date Mar 2013
    Location Death Star
    Posts 109
    Organisation
    Imperial Legion
    Rep Power 7

    Default

    There was a long thread on this just a little while ago here http://www.revleft.com/vb/gun-rightsi-t178181/index.htm I would reiterate my opinion in the thread, namely that gun control is counterproductive, falls mostly upon the poor and minorities, and will only inhibit us (and not the richer and more well connected reactionaries) in any revolutionary situation.
    [FONT=Verdana]Three Kings in Darkness Lie[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana] Gutheran of Org, and I[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana] Under a bleak and sunless sky[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana] When will the fourth arise?[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana] Only when another dies.[/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=Verdana] -- Michael Moorcock[/FONT]
  8. #7
    Join Date Nov 2011
    Location Michigan, United States
    Posts 535
    Organisation
    JBM
    Rep Power 16

    Default

    I am against gun control. Gun control is not designed to stop crime like supporters tell you but rather to allow the state to monopolize the means of violence by restricting the populace's access to weapons. Hopefully the revolution will not turn into a complete Russian Civil War type shootout but if it does the revolutionary proletariat will want to be able to defend itself from the forces of reaction. There are too many examples of revolutionary left groups being stamped out by government thugs. As revolutionaries who advocate for the overthrow of such power structures we should be opposed to such measures.
    In a world with drones, tanks and cruise missiles I doubt weather or not the American workers can posses high capacity magazines matters.

    To be honest I'm in favor of gun control, background checks are obviously supported by everybody who doesn't stand to make a profit off of gun violence but I still feel as though that is not good enough. Why would anybody need to own an assault rife?

    For self defense and hunting? That sounds like overkill.

    To fight off a tyrannical government? See line 1.

    To shoot at paper? Go right ahead! Have fun! But does limiting the amount of ammunition you can have in your posseion or better yet letting the range hold on to the guns really hinder that experience too much?
    Comrade Samuel: The defender of truth, justice and the un-American way.
  9. #8
    Join Date Apr 2013
    Posts 12
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    To give the bourgeois state the mandate to disarm any particular individual or group is to give the state the mandate to disarm the proletariat. One would have to be brain-dead to suggest otherwise. The same goes for giving the state the mandate to carry out the death penalty, or to do really anything at all that isn't a concession given as a result of organic proletarian struggle.

    The bourgeoisie are no longer revolutionary and we are far beyond the point where we can collaborate with them on anything at all. The present situation is completely contrary to the interests of "the real movement which abolishes the present state of things".

    That being said, communists cannot work with the gun rights movement either, for reasons that should be quite obvious; the death of all revolutionary energies does lie in class collaboration, after all.
    Last edited by dēmistĕfī; 21st April 2013 at 08:32.
    The only freedom for the proletariat lies in its dictatorship.
  10. #9
    Join Date Aug 2010
    Location Agony
    Posts 719
    Organisation
    The Homosexual Agenda
    Rep Power 21

    Default

    To give the bourgeois state the mandate to disarm any particular individual or group is to give the state the mandate to disarm the proletariat. One would have to be brain-dead to suggest otherwise. The same goes for giving the state the mandate to carry out the death penalty, or to do really anything at all that isn't a concession given as a result of organic proletarian struggle.

    The bourgeoisie are no longer revolutionary and we are far beyond the point where we can collaborate with them on anything at all. The present situation is completely contrary to the interests of "the real movement which abolishes the present state of things".

    That being said, communists cannot work with the gun rights movement either, for reasons that should be quite obvious; the death of all revolutionary energies does lie in class collaboration, after all.
    What you say about class collaboration is true.
    And indeed, the bourgeoisie is no longer revolutionary. But the proletariat is not yet revolutionary, as far as I can see--not conscious, I mean; and the vast majority of us (the proles) still support both some form of gun control and the death penalty. And this is expected, since as Gramsci says, "the ruling ideology is the ideology of the ruling class" (horribly paraphrased and condensed).

    Even so, the majority of proles in the U.S. seemed to want gun control, but they did not get it due to the prevailing interests of a certain category of bourgeoisie. Obviously we do not have any "concessions given as a result of organic proletarian struggle", but if we had, I can't say all of the forum would have been happy for it. AT ANY RATE, what probably needs to be done is the proletariat further educated on the folly of the death penalty and... I guess... of too strict firearms regulation, though I don't personally see the use of that latter since I wasn't brought up learning to like shootin' paper and shit.

    More importantly though, fuck U.S. political system, and the cops, who commit a lot of gun crime not recognised as crime.
    Dann steigt aus den Trümmern der alten Gesellschaft, Die Sozialistische Weltrepublik!
    The Soul of Man under Socialism
  11. #10
    Join Date Mar 2013
    Location Mumbai, India
    Posts 335
    Organisation
    sympathizer, CPGB-ML
    Rep Power 0

    Default

    Liberals are complete hypocrites.

    They ask for gun control for the population but not for the cops!
    They preach non-violence/pacifism to the oppressed people but not to the state!
  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Akshay! For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. What is our stance on Marijuana?
    By Fiskpure in forum Learning
    Replies: 233
    Last Post: 25th September 2009, 21:02
  2. BC Election: What Stance is Appropriate?
    By Monkey Riding Dragon in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13th May 2009, 17:30
  3. What's our stance on Russia?
    By R_P_A_S in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25th September 2008, 20:18
  4. Military Stance - What sort of stance would you like?
    By CubanFox in forum News & Ongoing Struggles
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 24th May 2003, 22:24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Tags for this Thread